Article published In:
Dialogicity in Political Discourse
Edited by Elda Weizman and Zohar Livnat
[Pragmatics and Society 13:5] 2022
► pp. 769792
References
Austin, John L.
1975How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1972Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Chandler Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1983The Dynamics of Political Interviews. Text 3(2): 131–153.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer and Dániel Z. Kádár
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner
Clark, Billy
2013Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas B. Carlson
1982Hearers and Speech Acts. Language 58(2): 332–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2017Participation as audience design. In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by C. R. Hoffmann and W. Bublitz, 61–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2000Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews. Text 20(4): 1–46.Google Scholar
2006 “Minister, we will see how the public judges you”. Media References in Political Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The Dynamics of Discourse: Quantity Meets Quality. In Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, ed. by P. Cap and M. Dynel, 235–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. by C. Ilie and N. Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “And I quote”: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Computer-Mediated Discourse in Context: Pluralism of Communicative Action and Discourse Common Ground. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics. Theory and Practice, ed. by C. Xie, F. Yus, and H. Haberland, 47–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022Role of Context. In Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by I. Kecskes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
2015Introduction. In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Discourse Domains, ed. by E. Weizman and A. Fetzer, Anita, vii–xvii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “What I would say to John and everyone like John is …”: The Construction of Ordinariness through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1994Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1993English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David
1988A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews. Language in Society 171: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. III1, ed. by P. Cole, and J. L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1996The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by J. J. Gumperz, and S. C. Levinson, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003Response Essay. In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by S. L. Eerdmans, C. L. Prevignano and P. J. Thibault, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar
2013Mediated Performatives. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J. Verschueren and J. Östman, 1 – 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela
2017Participation as User Involvement. In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by C. R. Hoffmann and W. Bublitz, 31–59. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda and Anita Fetzer
2007Introduction. In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by A. Fetzer and G. Lauerbach, 3–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. C.
1979Activity Types and Language. Linguistics 171: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, Marcin and Mark Aakhus
2014Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 281: 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2011Speech Acts in Context. In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by A. Fetzer and E. Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2013Some Remarks about Speech Act Pluralism. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, ed. by A. Capone et al., 227–244. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
2010Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
2000Parliamentary Debates. In Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues, ed. by R. Wodak and T. van Dijk, 45–79. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
2019Introduction. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by A. Fetzer and E. Weizman, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar