Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogicity in Political Discourse
Edited by Elda Weizman and Zohar Livnat
[Pragmatics and Society 13:5] 2022
► pp. 769–792

Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena

Participation and pluralism of discursive action

| University of Augsburg
This paper examines the contextual constraints and requirements of discursive action in question-answer-sequences based discourse genres (interviews, Prime Minister’s Questions, People’s Prime Minister’s Questions) in mediated political discourse. It considers the multilayeredness of participation and pluralism of discursive action on the one hand, and the delimiting frame of the dialogic discourse genres on the other. It shows that both have a decisive impact on the participants’ meaning-making processes in context: the inherently unbounded participation framework contributes to pluralism of discursive action, while genre- and media constraints narrow down the scope of production and interpretation. This does not only hold for the stage at which a discursive action occurs in the discourse, but also for its degree of explicitness with regard to presuppositions and felicity conditions.
Keywords: context, contextualization, discourse genre, felicity conditions, media discourse, participation, pluralism of discursive action, question-answer sequence, social media
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discursive action in context
  • 3.Political discourse and participation
    • 3.1Participation in political interviews
    • 3.2Participation in Prime Minister’s Questions
    • 3.3Participation in people’s Prime Minister’s questions
  • 4.Participation and pluralism of discursive action
    • 4.1More prototypical question-and answer sequences
    • 4.2Less prototypical question-and answer sequences
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21025.fet
References (38)
References
Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Chandler Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1983. The Dynamics of Political Interviews. Text 3(2): 131–153.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’: The strategic use of ritual references to the Speaker of the UK House of Commons. Pragmatics 30(1): 64–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner (eds.). 2002. Politics as Talk and Text: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas B. Carlson. 1982. Hearers and Speech Acts. Language 58(2): 332–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2017. Participation as audience design. In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by C. R. Hoffmann and W. Bublitz, 61–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2000. Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews. Text 20(4): 1–46.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Minister, we will see how the public judges you”. Media References in Political Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The Dynamics of Discourse: Quantity Meets Quality. In Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, ed. by P. Cap and M. Dynel, 235–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. by C. Ilie and N. Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “And I quote”: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Computer-Mediated Discourse in Context: Pluralism of Communicative Action and Discourse Common Ground. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics. Theory and Practice, ed. by C. Xie, F. Yus, and H. Haberland, 47–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Role of Context. In Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by I. Kecskes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull. 2008. ”Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence”. The Strategic Use of Pronouns in Political Interviews. Journal of Language and Politics 7(2): 271–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman. 2015. Introduction. In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Discourse Domains, ed. by E. Weizman and A. Fetzer, Anita, vii–xvii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “What I would say to John and everyone like John is …”: The Construction of Ordinariness through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1994. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T.. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1988. A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews. Language in Society 171: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. III1, ed. by P. Cole, and J. L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1996. The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by J. J. Gumperz, and S. C. Levinson, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. Response Essay. In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by S. L. Eerdmans, C. L. Prevignano and P. J. Thibault, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2013. Mediated Performatives. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J. Verschueren and J. Östman, 1 – 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela. 2017. Participation as User Involvement. In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by C. R. Hoffmann and W. Bublitz, 31–59. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda and Anita Fetzer. 2007. Introduction. In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by A. Fetzer and G. Lauerbach, 3–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. C. 1979. Activity Types and Language. Linguistics 171: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, Marcin and Mark Aakhus. 2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 281: 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2011. Speech Acts in Context. In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by A. Fetzer and E. Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2013. Some Remarks about Speech Act Pluralism. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, ed. by A. Capone et al., 227–244. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 2010. Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2000. Parliamentary Debates. In Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues, ed. by R. Wodak and T. van Dijk, 45–79. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer. 2019. Introduction. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by A. Fetzer and E. Weizman, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fetzer, Anita
2024.  Being sensible is now a radical concept I LOVE that quote haha . Internet Pragmatics DOI logo
Zernetska, Olga V. & Pavlo V. Zernetskyi
2023. COMPARATIVE COMMUNICATIVE AND SEMANTIC DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL SPEECHES OF EARLY 21ST CENTURY. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 9. Current Trends in Language Development :26 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.