Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:4 (2024) ► pp.532–556

Correcting the scientific record

Legitimation strategies in retraction notices

ORCID logo | Shenzhen University
The retraction of a previously published research article, often due to the discovery of fraud or scientific error, can pose considerable threat to an author’s career and reputation. This paper examines legitimation strategies in the retraction notice (RN), a document in which authors formally announce their decision to retract an article. By analyzing 300 RNs published between 2010–2021 in Q1 biomedical journals, this study finds that 76% RNs contain at least one legitimation strategy, with Mortification, Full/Partial Denial, and Corrective Action being the most frequently used. Moreover, a comparison of RNs that report fraud, misconduct, error, unreliable data/results, and other similar matters shows that fraud-related RNs have the highest incidence of legitimation strategies. Authors committing fraud often employ Mortification, Disclaimer, and Reassurance, while authors reporting scientific errors put more emphasis on Good Intention and Perseverance. This study contributes to the understanding of legitimation and image repair in scientific discourse.
Keywords: retraction notices, scientific error, fraud, legitimation strategies, high-impact journal, image repair, discursive strategies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Retractions and retraction notices
  • 3.Legitimation strategies in discourse
  • 4.Data and methods
    • 4.1Data collection
    • 4.2Data analysis
  • 5.Results
    • Denial
      • Full Denial
      • Partial Denial
    • Mitigation
      • Disclaimer
      • Rationalization
      • Good Intention
    • Admission
      • Corrective action
      • Reassurance
      • Mortification
    • Perseverance
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22008.lin
References (64)
References
Aguilera-Carnerero, Carmen. 2022. ‘From Our Sisters/to Our Sisters: The Discursive Construction of Ideal Womanhood in the Official Magazines of the Islamic State’. Pragmatics and Society 13 (3): 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altman, Douglas G. 2002. ‘Poor-Quality Medical Research: What Can Journals Do?’ JAMA 287 (21): 2765–2767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Melissa S., Emily A. Ronning, Raymond De Vries, and Brian C. Martinson. 2007. ‘The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships’. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 437–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archakis, Argiris. 2018. ‘The Representations of Racism in Immigrant Students’ Essays in Greece: The “Hybrid Balance” between Legitimizing and Resistance Identities’. Pragmatics 28 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Azoulay, Pierre, Alessandro Bonatti, and Joshua L. Krieger. 2017. ‘The Career Effects of Scandal: Evidence from Scientific Retractions’. Research Policy 46 (9): 1552–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William. 1997. ‘Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication’. Public Relations Review 23 (2): 177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi. 2021. ‘The Discursive Construction of Legitimacy in the Abrogation of Indian Constitution’s Article 370’. Journal of Pragmatics 1831: 132–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bik, Elisabeth M., Arturo Casadevall, and Ferric C. Fang. 2016. ‘The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications’. MBio 7 (3): e00809–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brainard, Jeffrey, and Jia You. 2018. ‘What a Massive Database of Retracted Papers Reveals about Science Publishing’s “Death Penalty”’. Science. 25 October 2018. [URL]
Breeze, Ruth. 2012. ‘Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: Oil Corporations after Deepwater Horizon’. Discourse & Society 23 (1): 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budd, John M., MaryEllen Sievert, and Tom R. Schultz. 1998. ‘Phenomena of Retraction: Reasons for Retraction and Citations to the Publications’. JAMA 280 (3): 296–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, John. 2021. ‘False Individual Patient Data and Zombie Randomised Controlled Trials Submitted to Anaesthesia’. Anaesthesia 76 (4): 472–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coombs, Timothy. 2007. ‘Attribution Theory as a Guide for Post-Crisis Communication Research’. Public Relations Review 33 (2): 135–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COPE Council. 2019. ‘COPE Retraction Guidelines – English.’ Committee on Publication Ethics. [URL]
Davis, Mark S., Michelle Riske-Morris, and Sebastian R. Diaz. 2007. ‘Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files’. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 395–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Philip. 2012. ‘The Persistence of Error: A Study of Retracted Articles on the Internet and in Personal Libraries’. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 100 (3): 184–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities’. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 133–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanelli, Daniele. 2013. ‘Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign’. PLOS Medicine 10 (12): e1001563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Ferric C., and Arturo Casadevall. 2011. ‘Retracted Science and the Retraction Index’. Infection and Immunity 79 (10): 3855–3859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Ferric C., R. Grant Steen, and Arturo Casadevall. 2012. ‘Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (42): 17028–17033. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo, and Carita Paradis. 2014. ‘A Model of Trust-Repair Discourse’. Journal of Pragmatics 741 (December): 52–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furman, Jeffrey L., Kyle Jensen, and Fiona Murray. 2012. ‘Governing Knowledge in the Scientific Community: Exploring the Role of Retractions in Biomedicine’. Research Policy 41 (2): 276–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieneisen, Michael L., and Minghua Zhang. 2012. ‘A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature’. PLOS One 7 (10): e44118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haggan, Madeline. 2004. ‘Research Paper Titles in Literature, Linguistics and Science: Dimensions of Attraction’. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (2): 293–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Rüdiger, and Regina Lülfs. 2014. ‘Legitimizing Negative Aspects in GRI-Oriented Sustainability Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Corporate Disclosure Strategies’. Journal of Business Ethics 123 (3): 401–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesselmann, Felicitas, and Martin Reinhart. 2019. ‘Science Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry? Apologies for Scientific Misconduct’. Science Communication 41 (5): 552–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesselmann, Felicitas, Verena Graf, Marion Schmidt, and Martin Reinhart. 2017. ‘The Visibility of Scientific Misconduct: A Review of the Literature on Retracted Journal Articles’. Current Sociology 65 (6): 814–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, Victor. 2021. ‘Denial in Managerial Responses: Forms, Targets and Discourse Environment’. Journal of Pragmatics 1761 (April): 124–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. ‘German and Japanese War Crime Apologies: A Contrastive Pragmatic Study’. Journal of Pragmatics 1771: 109–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Guangwei, and Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu. 2020. ‘Agency and Responsibility: A Linguistic Analysis of Culpable Acts in Retraction Notices’. Lingua, September, 102954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
ICMJE. 1988. ‘Retraction of Research Findings’. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 296 (6619): 400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, John. 2021. ‘Hundreds of Thousands of Zombie Randomised Trials Circulate among Us’. Anaesthesia 76 (4): 444–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotzin, Sheldon, and Peri L. Schuyler. 1989. ‘NLM’s Practices for Handling Errata and Retractions.’ Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 77 (4): 337–42.Google Scholar
Ledford, Heidi, and Richard Van Noorden. 2020. ‘High-Profile Coronavirus Retractions Raise Concerns about Data Oversight’. Nature 582 (7811): 160–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yuting. 2019. ‘Legitimating Negative Aspects in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence from China’. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 62 (3): 263–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. ‘Communicating Bad News in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: A Genre-Based Analysis of Chinese Companies’. Discourse & Communication 14 (1): 22–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. ‘Legitimation Strategies in Corporate Discourse: A Comparison of UK and Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility Reports’. Journal of Pragmatics 1771: 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yuting and Meilin Chen. 2022. ‘“The More Important Findings Are Sustained”: A Diachronic Perspective on the Genre of the Retraction Notice’. English for Specific Purposes 671: 18–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Susan Feng, Ginger Zhe Jin, Brian Uzzi, and Benjamin Jones. 2013. ‘The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science’. Scientific Reports 3 (1): 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merkl-Davies, Doris, and Niamh Brennan. 2007. ‘Discretionary Disclosure Strategies in Corporate Narratives: Incremental Information or Impression Management?’ Journal of Accounting Literature 261: 116–194.Google Scholar
Michalek, Arthur M., Alan D. Hutson, Camille P. Wicher, and Donald L. Trump. 2010. ‘The Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study’. PLOS Medicine 7 (8): e1000318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mongeon, Philippe, and Vincent Larivière. 2016. ‘Costly Collaborations: The Impact of Scientific Fraud on Co-Authors’ Careers’. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (3): 535–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oddo, J. 2011. ‘War Legitimation Discourse: Representing “Us” and “Them” in Four US Presidential Addresses’. Discourse & Society 22 (3): 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oransky, Ivan. 2020. ‘List of Retracted COVID-19 Papers Grows Past 70’. Retraction Watch (blog). 30 December 2020. [URL]
Page, Ruth. 2014. ‘Saying “Sorry”: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter’. Journal of Pragmatics 621 (February): 30–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redman, Barbara K., Hossein N. Yarandi, and Jon F. Merz. 2008. ‘Empirical Developments in Retraction’. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11): 807–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resnik, David B., and C. Neal Stewart. 2012. ‘Misconduct versus Honest Error and Scientific Disagreement’. Accountability in Research 19 (1): 56–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resnik, David B., Elizabeth Wager, and Grace E. Kissling. 2015. ‘Retraction Policies of Top Scientific Journals Ranked by Impact Factor’. Journal of the Medical Library Association 103 (3): 136–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, G. L., and M. P. Pfeifer. 1992. ‘The Characteristics of Medical Retraction Notices.’ Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 80 (4): 328–334.Google Scholar
Steen, R. Grant. 2011. ‘Retractions in the Medical Literature: How Many Patients Are Put at Risk by Flawed Research?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11): 688–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, Andrew M., Arturo Casadevall, R. Grant Steen, and Ferric C. Fang. 2014. ‘Financial Costs and Personal Consequences of Research Misconduct Resulting in Retracted Publications’. Edited by Peter Rodgers. ELife 31 (August): e02956. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Mark. 1995. ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’. The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., and Judit Dobránszki. 2017. ‘Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context’. Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2): 521–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Office of Research Integrity. n.d. ‘Definition of Research Misconduct | ORI – The Office of Research Integrity’. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed 8 June 2021.
The Retraction Watch. (n.d.). ‘The Retraction Watch Database’. [URL] (Accessed 1 August 2020).
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1995. The Grammar of Legitimation. London: School of Printing, School of Media.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. ‘War Rhetoric of a Little Ally: Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq’. Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 65–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuong, Quan-Hoang. 2020. ‘The Limitations of Retraction Notices and the Heroic Acts of Authors Who Correct the Scholarly Record: An Analysis of Retractions of Papers Published from 1975 to 2019’. Learned Publishing 33 (2): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wager, Elizabeth, and Peter Williams. 2011. ‘Why and How Do Journals Retract Articles? An Analysis of Medline Retractions 1988–2008’. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (9): 567–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Peter, and Elizabeth Wager. 2013. ‘Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings from a Qualitative Study’. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Kath, and Catriona McDaid. 2011. ‘Reporting of Article Retractions in Bibliographic Databases and Online Journals’. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 99 (2): 164–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar