Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

“Why does he appear so ordinary, but he can be so confident”

A critical discourse analysis of controversial feminism in Chinese stand-up comedian Yang Li’s Talk Show Speeches

ORCID logo | Central China Normal University
ORCID logo | Central China Normal University
Adopting proximization theory as its analytical framework, this article examines the feminist discourse of controversial Chinese talk show performer Yang Li. Yang’s talk show is known for her incisive and sarcastically humorous remarks on men, and her speeches have aroused widespread controversies. Our analysis finds that by positioning herself and other women as the inside deictic-centers (IDCs) within her constructed discourse space, Yang tactically presents the spatial, temporal and axiological proximization from the outside deictic-centers (ODCs) mainly composed of men. Yang’s version of the controversial feminism has revealed gender inequality and conventional patriarchy in contemporary society; but the reliance on male- and class-based gender stereotypes and the imagery projected from past incidents to create gendered or even men-hating discourses has begot controversies and backlashes. This study also discusses how Yang’s controversial feminist discursive patterns are influenced by the platformization of daily life, and the commodification and entertainmentization of gender issues against the backdrop of contemporary Chinese society where neoliberalism, market, capital and convention coexist.
Keywords: yang, controversial feminism, proximization, STA model, IDCs/ODCs, talk show
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and analytical framework
    • 2.1The data
    • 2.2Analytical framework
  • 3.Data analysis
    • 3.1Analysis of spatial proximization
    • 3.2Analysis of temporal proximization
    • 3.3Analysis of axiological proximization
  • 4.Further discussion of findings
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.23059.wan
References (45)
References
Barlow, Tani. 2004. The Question of Women in Chinese Feminism. Durham: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2008. “Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatic 40 (1): 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Crossing symbolic distances in political discourse space: Evaluative rhetoric within the framework of proximization.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 313–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research: A critical review.” Pragmatics and Society 12 (2): 309–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, Prudence. 2017. The Feminist Fourth Wave: Affective Temporality. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Dan and Gengsong Gao. 2023. “The transgressive rhetoric of standup comedy in China.” Critical Discourse Studies 20 (1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Eva. 2016. “Power femininity” and popular women’s magazines in China.” International Journal of communication 101: 2831–2835.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dai, Jinhua. 2002. “Redemption and Consumption: Depicting Culture in the 1990s.” In Cinema and Desire: Feminist Marxism and Cultural Politics in the Work of Dai Jinhua, ed, by Tani E. Barlow and Jing Wang, 172–188. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1641. Meditations on First Philosophy. Paris: Michael Soly.Google Scholar
Frith, Katherine and Yang Feng. 2009. “Transnational cultural flows: An analysis of women’s magazines in China.” Chinese Journal of Communication 2(2): 158–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Liping. 2020. “Man-mocking comedian accused of being ‘sexist’, but who is the joke on?” Ecns.cn. Accessed January 30 2023. [URL]
Guo, Jingyi, Zhang Ziwei, Song Jinhong, Jin Lu, Yu Duan and Sara Liao. 2022. “Femvertising and Postfeminist Discourse: Advertising to Break Menstrual Taboos in China.” Women’s Studies in Communication 45 (3): 378–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 1990. “Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imagination1.” Annals of the association of American geographers 80 (3): 418–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Wing Shan. 2022. “Chinese Supermom: Re-domesticating women in reality TV shows.” Feminist media studies 22 (7): 1801–1816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jammer, Max. 1994. Concepts of space: The history of theories of space in physics. Canada: General Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Concepts of Time in Physics: A Synopsis”. Physics in Perspective. 9 (3): 266–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1781. Critique of Pure Reason. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M. 2009. “Entitled to consume: Postfeminist femininity and a culture of post-critique.” Discourse & communication 3 (4): 371–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis.” In Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Michelle M. Lazar, 1–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M. and Lixin Wan. 2022. “Remediatisation, media interdiscursivity and ideological ambivalence in online news reports on sexual assault.” Discourse, Context & Media 481: 100620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chun, Liu Bohong and Jin Yihong. 1998. “China.” In A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, ed. by Alison M. Jaggar and Iris Marion Young, 108–117. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Liu, Fengshu. 2014. “From degendering to (re) gendering the self: Chinese youth negotiating modern womanhood.” Gender and Education 26 (1): 18–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Looft, Ruxandra. 2017. “# girlgaze: Photography, fourth wave feminism, and social media advocacy.” Continuum 31 (6): 892–902. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meng, Bingchun and Yanning Huang. 2017. “Patriarchal capitalism with Chinese characteristics: gendered discourse of ‘Double Eleven’ shopping festival.” Cultural Studies 31 (5): 659–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nartey, Mark. 2021. “A feminist critical discourse analysis of Ghanaian feminist blogs”. Feminist Media Studies 21 (4): 657–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peng, Altman Yuzhu. 2021. “Neoliberal feminism, gender relations, and a feminized male ideal in China: A critical discourse analysis of Mimeng’s WeChat posts.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (1): 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Digital nationalism versus gender politics in post-reform China: Gender-issue debates on Zhihu.” Global Media and Communication 18 (3): 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qiao, Fei and Ye Wang. 2022. “The myths of beauty, age, and marriage: femvertising by masstige cosmetic brands in the Chinese market.” Social Semiotics 32 (1): 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spearman, Charles. 1904. “General intelligence objectively determined and measured.” American Journal of Psychology 151: 201–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1927. “The measurement of intelligence.” Nature 1201: 577–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1979. “Individuals and groups in social psychology.” British Journal of social and clinical psychology 18 (2): 183–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, Louis L. 1928. “Attitudes can be measured.” American journal of Sociology 33 (4): 529–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, Warren S. 1952. “Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method.” Psychometrika 17 (4): 401–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Bin and Catherine Driscoll. 2019. “Chinese feminists on social media: Articulating different voices, building strategic alliances.” Continuum 33 (1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wesoky, Sharon R. 2012. “Harmony and Critique: Chinese Modernity, Harmonious Society, and Contemporary Chinese Feminist Perspectives.” In China’s Rise to Power: Conceptions of State Governance, ed. by Tse-Hei Joseph Lee, Nedilsky, Lida V. and Cheung Siu-Keung, 49–69. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The discourse-historical approach”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. Sage.Google Scholar
Woelfel, Joseph and Edward L. Fink. 1980. “The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and method.”Google Scholar
Wu, Angela Xiao and Yige Dong. 2019. “What is made-in-China feminism (s)? Gender discontent and class friction in post-socialist China.” Critical Asian Studies 51 (4): 471–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Fan. 2020. “Post-feminism and chick flicks in China: Subjects, discursive origin and new gender norms.” Feminist Media Studies 1–16.Google Scholar
Young, Gale and Aiston Scott. Householder. 1938. “Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances.” Psychometrika 3 (1): 19–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Shiyu and Min Xu. 2022. “From leftover women to cuihun–audience reception of TV representation on marriageable single women in China.” Feminist Media Studies 22 (2): 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar