Article In:
Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

Citizens’ polarised discourses on climate change and mobility

The conflict with Barcelona mayor Ada Colau

ORCID logo | University of A Coruña
ORCID logo | University of A Coruña
The purpose of this paper is to analyse a conflict between a group of Barcelona residents and the then mayor, Ada Colau, concerning the transformation of an area of the city into a green zone, which would involve the loss of public parking spaces. For data-gathering and analysis we have used ethnographic research and Critical Discourse Analysis. Our analysis reveals that the majority of citizens involved, by means of the different resources (ontological metaphors and various types of arguments), activate different frames with the aim of disputing the mayor’s standpoint. Our interpretation demonstrates that, from a position of climate change denial, these citizens do not explicitly deny scientific evidence, but do oppose radical changes to their own neighbourhood and lifestyle. Finally, we conclude with a brief reflection on the methodology used and on the need for a greater interconnection between discourse analysis and other social disciplines related to this topic.
Keywords: polarised conflicts, analysis of polarised discourse, analysis of environmental discourse, urban mobility, climate change denial, cognitive frame, ontological metaphor, (Critical) Discourse Analysis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
  • 3.Theory and methodology
  • 4.Analysis
  • 5.Interpretation and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (32)
References
Alcíbar Cuello, Miguel. 2023. “Medioambiente y estudios del discurso.” In Estudios del Discurso. The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Discourse Studies, ed. by Carmen López-Ferreiro, Isolda E. Carranza, and Teun A. van Dijk, 287–301. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Dong Jie. 2010. Ethnographic Fieldwork. A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caimotto, M. Cristina. 2024. “Mobility Justice: An Ecolinguistic Perspective.” Languages 91: 242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Criado Pérez, Caroline. 2019. La Mujer Invisible. Titivillus (digital edition).Google Scholar
Domínguez, Martí, Sara Moreno, and Tatiana Pina. 2022. “Unicorns, Donkeys and Elephants: the Battle on Climate Change in the United States of America as Reflected in Cartoons.” In Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, ed. by Laura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 215–234. London: Routledge. [URL]
Doughty, Karolina, and Lesley Murray. 2016. “Discourses of Mobility: Institutions, Everyday Lives and Embodiment.” Mobilities 11 (2): 303–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alexandro. 1997. Antropología Lingüística. Madrid: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura, and Esperanza Morales-López. 2022. “Introduction.” In Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, ed. by Laura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 1–22. London: Routledge. [URL]
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2014. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, B.-Chul. 2021. Infocracia. La Digitalización y la Crisis de la Democracia. Buenos Aires: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Herdt, T., & Muñoz Sanz, V. (2023). Experts as Game Changers? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Climate Measures in the Metropolitan Region of Amsterdam. Urban Planning 8(2), 307-321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Posverdad. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, Nicolina, and Esperanza Morales-López. 2015. “Multimodal Narrative as an Instrument for Social Change: Reinventing Democracy in Spain -the Case of 15M.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (CADAAD) 7 (2): 200–221. [URL]
Morales-López, Esperanza. 2012. “Análisis de Discursos Ideológicos en la Empresa: La Deslegitimación y la Defensa de las Energías Renovables.” FORUM. Qualitative Social Research 13 (3), 20. [URL]
. 2017. “Cognitive Frames, Imaginaries and Discursive Constructions: Post 15M discourses with Reference to Eco-social Alternatives.” In Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist Perspectives on Discourse Studies, ed. by Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 249–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Discourse Analysis: Constructivist Perspective and Transdisciplinarity.” In Applications of Complexity Theory in Language and Communication Sciences, ed. by Albert Bastardas-Boada, Àngels Massip-Bonet, and Gemma Bel-Enguix, 187–205. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Tratado de la Argumentación. La Nueva Retórica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Pujante, David. 2017. “The Discursive Construction of Reality in the Context of Rhetoric: Constructivist Rhetoric.” In Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectives, ed. by Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 41–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2024. El Mundo en la Palabra. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Salvador, Vicent. 2022. “The Social Debate on Energy Sources.” In Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, ed. by Laura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, 235–252. London: Routledge.
Scollon, Ron, and Susanne Wong Scollon. 2001. Intercultural Communication. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shi, Wen, Haohuan Fu, Peinan Wang, Changfeng Chen, and Jie Xiong. 2020. “#Climatechange vs. #Globalwarming: Characterizing Two Competing Climate Discourses on Twitter with Semantic Network and Temporal Analyses.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 171, 1062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2003. Ideología y Discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2012. Ideology in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in the Ninetheenth Century in Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar