Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.43–66

Patterns of discourse semantics

A corpus-assisted study of financial crisis in British newspaper discourse in 2009

Corpus-assisted analyses of public discourse often focus on the lexical level. This article argues in favour of corpus-assisted analyses of discourse, but also in favour of conceptualising salient lexical items in public discourse in a more determined way. It draws partly on non-Anglophone academic traditions in order to promote a conceptualisation of discourse keywords, thereby highlighting how their meaning is determined by their use in discourse contexts. It also argues in favour of emphasising the cognitive and epistemic dimensions of discourse-determined semantic structures. These points will be exemplified by means of a corpus-assisted, as well as a frame-based analysis of the discourse keyword financial crisis in British newspaper articles from 2009. Collocations of financial crisis are assigned to a generic matrix frame for ‘event’ which contains slots that specify possible statements about events. By looking at which slots are more, respectively less filled with collocates of financial crisis, we will trace semantic presence as well as absence, and thereby highlight the pragmatic dimensions of lexical semantics in public discourse. The article also advocates the suitability of discourse keyword analyses for systematic contrastive analyses of public/political discourse and for lexicographical projects that could serve to extend the insights drawn from corpus-guided approaches to discourse analysis.
Keywords: frame-based contrastive analysis, corpus linguistics, discourse keywords (DKW), discourse semantics, semantic presence/absence, public/political discourse
Published online: 10 March 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.1.03sch
References (49)
Anthony, Laurence. 2011. AntConc (Computer Software Version 3.3.1w.). Tokyo: Waseda University. Available online at: [URL]Google Scholar
Ayto, John. 1999. Twentieth Century Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 191: 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2004. “Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency and Sense in Keyword Analysis.” Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4): 346–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 41: 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2010. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bassi, Erica. 2010. “A Contrastive Analysis of Keywords in Newspaper Articles on the “Kyoto Protocol”.” In Keyness in Texts, ed. by Marina Bondi and Mike Scott, 207–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belica, Cyril. 1995. Statistische Kollokationsanalyse und -clustering. Korpuslinguistische Analysemethode. Mannheim: IDS. Available online at: [URL]Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina, and Mike Scott (eds). 2010. Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Otto, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Kosellek. 1972ff. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Bubenhofer, Noah. 2013. “Quantitativ informierte qualitative Diskursanalyse. Korpuslinguistische Zugänge zu Einzeltexten und Serien.” In Perspektiven einer angewandten Diskurslinguistik, ed. by Kersten Sven Roth and Carmen Spiegel, 103–129. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busse, Dietrich. 2008. “Diskurslinguistik als Epistemologie – Das verstehensrelevante Wissen als Gegenstand linguistischer Forschung.” In Methoden der Diskurslinguistik – sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene ed. by Ingo Warnke and Jürgen 
Spitzmüller, 57–87. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 2000. “Aspects of the Micro-structure of Word Meanings.” In Polysemy. Theoretical and Computational Approaches, ed. by Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock, 30–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. Experience and Nature. London: Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felbick, Dieter. 2003. Schlagwörter der Nachkriegszeit 1945–1949. Berlin & New York: 
de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1976. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language.” In Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 2801 (Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech), 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2007. “Lexical Priming, Literary Creativity.” In Text, Discourse and Corpora. Theory and Analysis, ed. by Michael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs, and 
Wolfgang Teubert, 7–29. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Konerding, Klaus‐Peter. 1993. Frames und lexikalisches Bedeutungswissen. Untersuchungen zur linguistischen Grundlegung einer Frametheorie und zu ihrer Anwendung in der Lexikographie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louw, Eric. 2010. The Media and Political Process (2nd edition). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela. 2007. “Lexical Items in Discourse: Identifying Local Textual Functions of Sustainable Development.” In Text, Discourse and Corpora. Theory and Analysis, ed. by Michael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs, and Wolfgang Teubert, 191–218. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. “Checks and Balances. How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 122–143. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Die kritische Masse. Korpuslinguistik und kritische Diskursanalyse.” In Korpuspragmatik. Thematische Kopora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen von Texten und Gesprächen, ed. by Ekkehard Felder, Marcus Müller, and Friedemann Vogel, 79–110. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Kevin. 2005. “The Institutional Provision for Silence. On the Evasive Nature of Politicians’ Answers to Reporters’ Questions.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (3): 443–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Née, Emilie, and Marie Veniard. 2012. “Analyse du Discours à Entrée Lexicale (A.D.E.L.): le renouveau par la sémantique?” Langage et Société 1401: 15–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nier, Thomas. 1993. Schlagwörter im politisch-kulturellen Kontext. Zum öffentlichen Diskurs in der BRD von 1966 bis 1974. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2010. (ed). Angus Stephenson (3rd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Posch, Claudia. 2010. “Ich halte es für den falschen Weg, sich täglich weiter in die Krise hineinreden zu lassen. Das (nicht) Sprechen über die globale Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise in österreichischen Medien. Aptum.” Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 21: 121–137.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2011. “(Critical) Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics. Commonalities and Differences.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 7–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitz-Berning, Cornelia. 2000. Vokabular des Nationalsozialismus. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani. 2013. “Die kontrastive Analyse politischer Diskurse. Skizze, Verkomplizierung und Ausblick.” In Politik als sprachlich gebundenes Wissen. Politische Sprache im lebenslangen Lernen und politischen Handeln, ed. by Jörg Kilian and Thomas Niehr, 91–105. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Storjohann, Petra. 2007. “Der Diskurs “Globalisierung” in der öffentlichen Sprache. Eine korpusgestützte Analyse kontextueller Thematisierungen. Aptum.” Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 21: 139–155.Google Scholar
Storjohann, Petra, and Melani Schröter. 2011. “Die Ordnung des öffentlichen Diskurses der Wirtschaftskrise und die (Un-)Ordnung des Ausgeblendeten. Aptum.” Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 11: 32–53.Google Scholar
Stötzel, Georg, and Thorsten Eitz. 2002. Zeitgeschichtliches Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Strauß, Gerhard, Ulrike Haß, and Gisela Harras. 1989. Brisante Wörter von Agitation bis Zeitgeist. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Three Concepts of Keywords.” In Keyness in Texts, ed. by Marina Bondi and Mike Scott, 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang, and Anna Čermáková. 2004. “Directions in Corpus Linguistics.” In Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Michael Halliday, Wolfgang Teubert, Collin Yallop, and Anna Čermáková, 113–166. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang. 2007. “Parole-linguistics and the Diachronic Dimension of the Discourse.” In Text, Discourse and Corpora. Theory and Analysis, ed. by Michael Hoey, Michaela 
Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs and Wolfgang Teubert, 57–87. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2010. Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. 2010. “Noch nie zuvor. Zur sprachlichen Konstruktion der Wirtschaftskrise 2008/2009 im SPIEGEL. Aptum.” Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 21: 138–156.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding Cultures through their Key Words. English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Experience, Evidence, and Sense. The Hidden Cultural Legacy of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna, and Jean Harkin (eds). 2001. Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. 2008a. Frames und sprachliches Wissen. Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. “Frame-Semantik und Diskursanalyse: Skizze einer kognitionswissenschaftlich inspirierten Methode zur Analyse gesellschaftlichen Wissens.” In Methoden der Diskurslinguistik – sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene, ed. by Ingo Warnke and Jürgen Spitzmüller, 89–116. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Krise im politischen Wahlkampf: linguistische Korpusanalysen mit AntConc.” In Die da oben: Sprache, Wahlen, Partizipation, ed. by Frank Liedtke, 69–90. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Nielsen, Mie Femø
2024. Gendered subtle bias in Danish TV election debates. Pragmatics and Society DOI logo
Carreon, Jonathan R. & Elvira S. Balinas
2023. Philippine Free Higher Education News Reports: Corpus-Based Comparative Analysis of Seven English National Newspapers. Higher Education Policy 36:4 ► pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Cruz, Javier & Antonio Moreno-Ortiz
2020. Building the Great Recession News Corpus (GRNC): A contemporary diachronic corpus of economy news in English. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Ramirez, Carlos D.
2020. The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty Under Fractional Integration. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Ramirez, Carlos D.
2024. The effect of economic policy uncertainty under fractional integration. Portuguese Economic Journal 23:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Nartey, Mark & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2019. Towards a decade of synergising corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: a meta-analysis. Corpora 14:2 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Schröter, Melani, Marie Veniard, Charlotte Taylor & Andreas Blätte
2019. Chapter 1. A comparative analysis of the keyword multicultural(ism) in French, British, German and Italian migration discourse. In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Madsen, Dorte
2018. Conspicuous by Presence: The Empty Signifier ‘Interdisciplinarity’ and the Representation of Absence. In Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse, ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte
2017. Chapter 2. Togetherness or othering?. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 74], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Schröter, Melani & Marie Veniard
2016. Contrastive analysis of keywords in discourses. International Journal of Language and Culture 3:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.