Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:4 (2017) ► pp. 520–541

Order in disorder

Audience responses and political rhetoric in speeches from the second round of the 2012 French presidential election

| Universidad Tecnológica Centroamericana (UNITEC)
| University of York

Recent research has established that Japanese political oratory and audience behaviour (Bull & Feldman 2011; Feldman & Bull 2012) are fundamentally different to those found in British political speeches (Heritage & Greatbatch 1986). To further develop these cross-cultural analyses of political rhetoric, speaker-audience interaction was analysed in ten speeches by the two second-round candidates in the 2012 French presidential elections (François Hollande; Nicolas Sarkozy). Analogous to British speeches, French speeches were characterised by “implicit” affiliative response invitations and asynchronous speaker-audience interaction, in contrast to Japanese “explicit” invitations and synchrony. These results were interpreted in terms of Hofstede’s (2001) individualism-collectivism cultural dimensions. Dissimilarities in audience responses between the two candidates were also identified and discussed. The analysis of cross-cultural differences continues to reveal the intricate differences between societies, and ensures academic understanding on rhetoric is not boxed into crude universal rules.

Keywords: political speeches, rhetoric, audience response, applause, French, cross-cultural analysis
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
  • Results
    • Cross-cultural Analysis
      • Analysis of rhetoric
      • Speaker-audience synchrony
      • Synchrony
      • Isolated responses
    • Inter-speaker analysis
      • Audience responses
      • Collective and composite responses
      • Isolated responses and synchrony
      • Verbal responses
  • Discussion
    • Conclusions and wider implications
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 19 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.4.03led
References
Atkinson, John Maxwell
1983 Two devices for generating audience approval: A comparative study of public discourse and text. In K. Ehlich & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Connectedness in sentence, text and discourse (pp. 199–236). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
1984a Our masters’ voices. London & New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
1984b Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting applause. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 370–409). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter
2000 Do audiences only applaud claptrap in political speeches? An analysis of invited and uninvited applause. Social Psychological Review 21: 32–41.Google Scholar
2006 Invited and uninvited applause in political speeches. British Journal of Social Psychology 451: 563–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Claps and Claptrap: The Analysis of Speaker-Audience Interaction in Political Speeches. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1): 473–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter & Ofer Feldman
2011 Invitations to affiliative audience responses in Japanese political speeches. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30(2): 158–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter & Karolis Miskinis
2014 Whipping it up! An analysis of audience responses to political rhetoric in speeches from the 2012 American presidential elections. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Retrieved from: http://​jls​.sagepub​.com​/cgi​/reprint​/0261927X14564466v1​.pdf​?ijkey​=Gv2zBBzgQi8z0LL​&keytype​=finite doi:  DOI logo
Bull, Peter & Merel Noordhuizen
2000 The mistiming of applause in political speeches. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 191: 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter & Pam Wells
2002 By invitation only? An analysis of invited and uninvited applause. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 211: 230–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro
2010 Barack Obama’s South Carolina speech. Journal of Pragmatics 42(11): 2964–2977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro, &, Jacob L. Mey
2016 Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal
2012 Ethnography of communication. In L. Monaghan, J. E. Goodman & J. M. Robinson (Eds.), A cultural approach to interpersonal communication: Essential readings (2nd ed.) (pp. 245–248). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
1993 Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliative response. American Sociological Review 581: 110–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Alistair
1998 French politics and society. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J.
2013 Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (6th ed.). CQ Press: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Feldman, Ofer & Peter Bull
2012 Audience affiliation in Japanese political speeches. Language and Dialogue, 21, 375–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp.41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & David Greatbatch
1986 Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology 921: 110–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert
2001 Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede, & Michael Minkov
2010 Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Howarth, David J., & Georgios Varouxakis
2003 Contemporary France: an introduction to French politics and society. New York: Arnold.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan
2015 Pragmatics (2nd ed.). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs
1976 The Universality of conversational postulates, Language in Society 5(1): 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2016 Pragmatics seen through the prism of society. In A. Capone and J. L. Mey (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (pp. 15–42). Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
1994 Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3–4): 409–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 A theory of humor in interaction, Journal of Literary Theory 3(2): 261–283.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
1999 Situated politeness: Coordinated honorific and non-honorific sessions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics 9(1): 51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling
2011 Methodological issues in East Asian politeness research. In D. Z. Kádár & S. Mills (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 71–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhodan, Maya
2016, October 10 The Debate audience laughed, cheered and clapped –again. Retrieved from http://​time​.com​/4524488​/presidential​-debate​-town​-hall​-applause/
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urban, Mark
2014, April 24 Nationalism looks set to remain on trend in France. Retrieved from http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/news​/world​-17828284
Waugh, Linda R.
1995 Reported speech in journalistic discourse: The relation of function and text. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 15(1): 129–173.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1997 Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York & Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wong, Jock O.
2014 The Culture of Singapore English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bull, Peter & Maurice Waddle
2021. Speaker-audience intercommunication in political speeches: A contrast of cultures. Journal of Pragmatics 186 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Choi, Hyangmi & Peter Bull
2021. Speaker’s verbal behavior and collective audience responses in Korean political oratory. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.