Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 16:2 (2018) ► pp. 494–518

English as a lingua franca in Europe: The identification of L1 and L2 accents

A multifactorial analysis of pan-European experimental data

| Universidad Complutense de Madrid
| University of Leuven
| University of Leuven
While empirical research on attitudes towards languages and linguistic varieties has become increasingly popular from the 1960s onwards (e.g. Lambert, Hodgson, Gardner, & Fillenbaum, 1960), experimental investigations into the ability to correctly identify the origin of speakers are in comparison still relatively scarce. We know that the ability to correlate a stretch of uncategorised speech (token) with a series of models (types) is experientially acquired in early childhood (e.g. Kristiansen, 2010), but how similar are those abilities in adulthood and across European nations? English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) has become an integral part of the linguistic reality in Europe (and of the linguistic scenario in the entire world) (e.g. Jenkins, Baker, & Dewey, 2018). Whenever we communicate with anyone who is not a speaker of our own native language in any European country, most of the time we communicate in English. But does our L1 accent still shine through? Will we be recognised (and in most cases probably also stereotypically judged) on the basis of just a short stretch of speech when we communicate in ELF? In Part I of this paper we outline the design of the first large-scale pan-European project on L1 and L2 identifications of ELF in Europe, including 785 respondents from 8 countries. Exploratory analyses confirm the hypothesis that statistically significant asymmetries would show up across different European countries or regions. In Part II of this paper we then aim to explain these asymmetries through a multifactorial statistical analysis (Geeraerts, Grondelaers, & Speelman, 1999; Tagliamonte & Baayen, 2012; Speelman, Heylen, & Geeraerts, 2018).
Keywords: English as a lingua franca, language awareness and identification, Cognitive Sociolinguistics, inferential statistics
Published online: 05 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00019.kri
References

References

Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrie, E., & McKenzie, R. M.
(2018) American or British?: L2 speakers’ recognition and evaluations of accent features in English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(4), 313–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. L.
(1975) Introduction to language attitudes II. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 5–9.Google Scholar
Dewey, M.
(2011) Accommodative ELF talk and teacher knowledge. In A. Archibald, A. Cogo, & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Latest trends in ELF research (pp. 205–228). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
[ p. 515 ]
Eisenchlas, S. A., & Tsurutani, C.
(2011) You sound attractive!: Perceptions of accented English in a multilingual environment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 216–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A.
(2009) The lingua franca factor. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(2), 147–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, P., Coupland, N., & Williams, A.
(2003) Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity, and performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(1983) Prototype theory and diachronic semantics: A case study. Indogermanische Forschungen, 88, 1–32.Google Scholar
(1985) Paradigm and paradox: Explorations into a paradigmatic theory of meaning and its epistemological background. Leuven: Universitaire Pers.Google Scholar
(1989) Prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics, 27(4), 587–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Cultural models of linguistic standardization. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, & M. Pütz (Eds.) Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp. 25–68). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Speelman, D.
(1999) Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Rakić, T.
(2014) Language attitudes: The social determinants and consequences of language variation. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graddol, D.
(1997) The future of English? London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S., & Kristiansen, T.
(2013) On the need to access deep evaluations when searching for the motor of standard language change. In T. Kristiansen & S. Grondelaers (Eds.), Language (de)standardisations in Late Modern Europe: Experimental studies (pp. 9–52). Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
House, J.
(2009) Introduction: The pragmatics of English as a Lingua Franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(2), 141–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvella, R. J., Bang, E., Jakobsen, A. L., & Mees, I. M.
(2001) Of mouths and men: Non‐native listeners’ identification and evaluation of varieties of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 37–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
(2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) (Un)pleasant? (in)correct? (un)intelligible?: ELF speakers’ perceptions of their accents. In A. Mauranen & E. Ranta (Eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and findings (pp. 10–36). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J., Baker, W., & Dewey, M.
(2018) The Routledge handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jurado, M. A., & Kristiansen, G.
to appear). How to measure foreign accentedness and intelligibility in an objective manner. Edited volume in Language Variation – European Perspectives (John Benjamins).
[ p. 516 ]
Kachru, B. B.
(1985) Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.) English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and the literature (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1992) The other tongue. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A.
(2014) World Englishes. In C. Leung & B. Street (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 33–45). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G.
(2001) Social and linguistic stereotyping: A cognitive approach to accents. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 9, 129–145.Google Scholar
(2003) How to do things with allophones: Linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought: Ideology, metaphors and meanings (pp. 69–120). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Towards a usage-based cognitive phonology. International Journal of English Studies, 6(2), 107–140.Google Scholar
(2008) Style shifting and shifting styles: A socio-cognitive approach to lectal variation. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 45–88). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Lectal acquisition and linguistic stereotype formation: An empirical study. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.) Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S.
(1960) Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, S.
(2005) Who speaks “broken English”?: US undergraduates’ perceptions of non-native English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 187–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marzo, S., Zenner, E., & Van de Mieroop, D.
forthc). The social meaning of sibilant palatalization in urban vernacular speech in Flanders: A prototype approach. In E. Zenner, A. Backus, & E. Winter-Froemel Eds Cognitive Contact Linguistics: Placing usage, meaning and mind at the core of contact-induced variation and change Berlin/Boston Mouton
McKenzie, R. M.
(2008) Social factors and non‐native attitudes towards varieties of spoken English: A Japanese case study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 63–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The sociolinguistics of variety identification and categorisation: Free classification of varieties of spoken English amongst non-linguist listeners. Language Awareness, 24(2), 150–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modiano, M.
(1999) International English in the global village. English Today, 15, 22–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, L.
(2006) Current research on intelligibility in English as a Lingua Franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 517 ]
Polzenhagen, F., & Dirven, R.
(2008) Rationalist or romantic model in globalisation. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 237–299). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Xia, X.
(2015) Language, culture and prototypicality. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 253–269). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., & Baugh, J.
(1999) Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 10–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E.
(1973) On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.) Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosseel, L.
(2017) New approaches to measuring the social meaning of language variation: Exploring the personalized implicit association test and the relational responding task. Unpublished PhD dissertation defended in September 2017, The University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Scales, J., Wennerstrom, A., Richard, D., & Wu, S. H.
(2012) Language learners’ perceptions of accent. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 715–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, P.
(2017) The symbolism of English on the Brexit battleground. World Englishes, 36(3), 356–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B.
(2002) Habeas corpus and divide et empera: “Global” English and applied linguistics. In K. Spellman Miller & P. Thompson (Eds.), Unity and diversity in language use (pp. 198–220). London: BAAL and Continuum.Google Scholar
(2004) Research perspectives on teaching English as a Lingua Franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speelman, D., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D.
(2018) Mixed-effects regression models in linguistics. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B., & Röthlisberger, M.
(2016) Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide, 37(2), 109–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Baayen, H. R.
(2012) Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24(2), 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(1989) Linguistic categorisation: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wieling, M., Nerbone, J., Bloem, J., Gooskens, C., Heeringa, W., & Baayen, R. H.
(2014) A cognitively grounded measure of pronunciation distance. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e75734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yano, Y.
(2001) World Englishes in 2000 and beyond. World Englishes, 20(2), 119–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, T. J., & Walsh, S.
(2010) Which English? Whose English?: An investigation of ‘non-native’ teachers’ beliefs about target varieties. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(2), 123–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 518 ]
Zenner, E., & Van De Mieroop, D.
forthc.). The alternation between standard and vernacular by Belgian Dutch parents in child-oriented control acts. In A. Ghimenton, A. Nardy, & J. Chevrot Eds. Sociolinguistic variation and language acquisition across the lifespan Amsterdam John Benjamins
Zhang, W., & Hu, G.
(2008) Second language learners’ attitudes towards English varieties. Language Awareness, 17(4), 342–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

No author info given
2020. Soziolinguistische Bibliographie europäischer Länder für 2018Sociolinguistic Bibliography of European Countries for 2018Bibliographie sociolinguistique des pays européens pour 2018. Sociolinguistica 34:1 ► pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
McKenzie, Robert M., Mimi Huang, Theng Theng Ong & Navaporn Snodin
2019. Socio-psychological salience and categorisation accuracy of speaker place of origin. Lingua 228 ► pp. 102705 ff. Crossref logo
van den Doel, Rias & Adriaan Walpot
2021.  In Language Variation – European Perspectives VIII [Studies in Language Variation, 25], ► pp. 36 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.