Book review
E. Pascual & S. Sandler (Eds.). The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive
interaction
References (16)
References
Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 2(1), 133–187.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Koven, M. (2002). An analysis of speaker role inhabitance in narratives of personal experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 167–217. .
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Virtual reality. Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.
Oakley, T., & Pascual, E. (2017). Conceptual blending theory. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 423–448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.
Pascual, E. (2006). Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245–267.
Talmy, L. (1996/2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, vol.1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zlatev, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica, 2–3(46–47), 123–152.