Article published In:
Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 78112
References (21)
References
Croft, W. (2006). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 269–302). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R. (2002). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75–111). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. UC Berkeley, Dissertation.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children. Child Development, 791, 979–1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, T., & Kishimoto, H. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, T., & Saito, M. (2016). Vocabulary strata and word formation processes. In T. Kageyama & H. Kishimoto (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation (pp. 1–50). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kanasugi, P. (2016). Hyōzōsei no Kanten kara mita Chekogo to Nihongo to no Hikaku – Chekogo niokeru “Keiyōshi + Meishi” no Kōzō o megutte. In Hikaku Nihongaku kjóiku kenkjú sentá kenkjú hókoku (pp. 142–147). Tokyo: Ochanomizu University.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 11: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 21: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive Grammar: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). On grammatical categories. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 44–80.Google Scholar
Maass, A., Karasawa, M., Politi, F., & Suga, S. (2006). Do verbs and adjectives play different roles in different cultures?_ A cross-linguistic analysis of person representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 734–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nihongo Kijutsu Bunpō Kenkjūkai. (2013). Gendai Nihongo Bunpō. Vol. 11. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Okimori, T., Kimura, Y., Tanaka, M., & Chin, R. (2011). Zukai Nihon no Goi. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Radden, G. (2002). How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 407–434). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, S. (1982). Nihongo bunpō, keitairon. Tokyo: Mugishobō.Google Scholar
Štícha, F. et al. (2013). Akademická gramatika spisovné češtiny. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Uehara, S. (1998). Syntactic categories in Japanese: A cognitive and typological introduction. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar