Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 155–186
Regular articles

Evolutionary order of macro-events in Mandarin

| Beihang University
This article aims to explore the evolutionary order of the five types of macro-event in Mandarin. As a methodology, a closed corpus is set up for five historical stages. The following is concluded: (1) The “V+C” constructions representing a macro-event started to appear from Stage III and continued to be used until the present stage; (2) The “V+C” constructions can only represent four out of five types of Talmy’s macro-event, and action correlating is not systematically represented; (3) The four types of macro-event appeared at a relatively similar time period, and their proportion is: Motion > State change > Temporal > Realization; (4) Verbs with PATH meaning in the V2 slot are more prone to grammaticalization than in the V1 in the serial verb construction “V1+V2”. This research is significant in bridging the areas of event structure, grammaticalization and typology, and might have implications for other languages as well.
Keywords: macro-event, macro-event hypothesis, Talmy, directional complements, grammaticalization, Mandarin, typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Evolutionary trend of the 11 simplex directional complements
    • 3.1Preliminary data for the 11 directional complements
    • 3.2The evolutionary trend of the 11 simplex directional complements
    • 3.3Evolutionary order of macro-event types in Stage III
    • 3.4Evolutionary order of macro-events in Stage IV
    • 3.5Evolutionary order of macro-events in Stage V
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00030.li
References (53)
References
Ameka, F. K., & Essegbey, J. (2013). Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 461, 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K. (2007). Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 831, 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). The spoken grammar of Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2010). The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics, 48(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar (pp. 201–236). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, S. (2012). A contrastive study on directional verbs in Chinese and German. Quarterly Journal of Chinese Studies, 1(4), 109–135.Google Scholar
Feng, M. (2014). Yu shi ming yan (Stories old and new).（冯梦龙, 2014,《喻世明言》, 陈熙中校注，北京: 中华书局｡）Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 575–601). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume 11 (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Z. (1996). Zuo’s commentary. Changsha: Hunan People’s Publishing House. （胡志辉（英译），陈克烱（今译）, 1996, 《左传》, 长沙：湖南人民出版社｡）Google Scholar
Huang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (1997). The annotation of Dunhuang literature. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (黄征，张涌泉编, 1997, 《敦煌变文校注》,北京：中华书局｡）Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 181, 369–411.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of Berkeley Press.Google Scholar
Li, T. F. (2018). Extending the Talmyan typology: A case study of the macro-event as event integration and grammaticalization in Mandarin. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 585–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Du, J., & Wolff, P. (2015). The linguistic representations of causing events and caused events in narrative discourse. Cognitive Semantics, 1(1), 45–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Xu, M., & Cienki, A. (2015). The linguistic representations of agency in causal chains. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of paradigms – New paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics (pp. 169–188). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liang, Y. (2001). A new sentence type of concurrent component in Pre-Qin Chinese. Chinese Linguistics, 41, 354–384.Google Scholar
(2007). The grammaticalization of directional verbs in Chinese. Shanghai: Xuelin Press. (梁银峰，2007， 《汉语趋向动词语法化》，上海：学林出版社｡ )Google Scholar
Liu, Q. (2011). A new account of tales of the world. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (刘义庆，2011， 《世说新语》，沈海波译 ，北京：中华书局｡)Google Scholar
Liu, Y. (Ed.). (1998). A comprehensive account of directional complements. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. (刘月华，1998， 《趋向补语通释》，北京：北京语言大学出版社｡ )Google Scholar
Muansuwan, N. (2000). Directional series verbs construction in Thai. In D. Flickinger & A. Kathol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International HPSG Conference. Berkeley: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A. (2006). Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 121–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). On the history of Chinese directionals. In G. Peng & F. Shi (Eds.), Eastward flows the Great River: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S-Y. WANG on his 80th birthday (pp. 415–29). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport, H. M., & Levin, B. (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 77(4), 766–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. D. (2002). The grammaticalization of directional verbs in Oceanic languages. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference on Oceanic Linguistics (COOL5), Canberra, Australia.
Rubin, E. (1921). Figur und Grund In Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Copenhagen: Glydendalkse. Reprinted in English translation in C. Beardslee; & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), (1958). Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. (2007). On manners and paths of refining Talmy’s typology of motion expressions via language documentation. In P. K. Austin, O. Bond, & D. Nathan (Eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory (pp. 223–233). London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Shi, W., & Wu, Y. (2014). Which way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese. Linguistics, 52(5), 1237–1292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological consideration. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS), 201, 487–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1972). Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1975a). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 419–430). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(1975b). Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 41 (pp. 181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & J. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 41 (pp. 627–649). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1985a). Figure and ground as thematic roles. Paper presented at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Seattle.
(1985b). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1985c). Force dynamics in language and thought. In W. H. Eilfort, P. D. Kroeber, & K. L. Peterson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity (Chicago Linguistic Society 21) (pp. 293–337). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
(1991). Path to realization: A typology of event integration. Buffalo Working Papers in Linguistics, 91–011, 147–87.Google Scholar
(2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II1: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2012). Main verb properties. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
(2016). Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2004). I’m your daddy. Yunnan: Yunnan People’s Publishing House. (王朔，2004，《我是你爸爸》，云南：云南人民出版社｡)Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2011). Study on the orientation of verbs and the pedagogy of directional verbs. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. (王媛，2011 《动词的方向性研究与趋向动词教学》， 北京：北京语言大学出版社｡)Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. (1989). On quasi-double-valency verbs. Linguistics Research, 11, 12–25. （ 袁毓林，1989， 准双向动词研究，《语言研究》第 11 期 ：12–25｡)Google Scholar
Zhao, X., & Liu, Z. (2014). Constraints on the functional extension of the quasi-double-valency verbs: A case of the interactions between verbs and clause structures. Studies of the Chinese Language, 21, 149–156. (赵旭，刘振平, 2014, 准双向动词功能扩展的制约因素，《中国语文》第 21 期 ：149–156 ｡)Google Scholar
Zuo, Q. (2016). Zuo’s commentary on spring and autumn annals. Translated by G. Danqing. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (左丘明, 2016,《春秋左氏传》，郭丹译，北京：中华书局｡)Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 21: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 159–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Li, Fuyin Thomas
2024. Image schemas and (point)-to-point event model for the macro-event. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
2023. Review of Lin (2019): Encoding motion events in Mandarin Chinese. A cognitive functional study. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
2024. Event integration as a driving force of language change: evidence from Chinese 使-shǐ-make. Language and Cognition 16:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiangling
2022. Mandarin and English Event Cognitive Alignment From Corpus-Based Semantic Fusion Model Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Zhang, Yuan
2022. Negation and underlying spatial cognition: The evolution of Chinesemei(you) as a case study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 42:3-4 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Li, Fuyin Thomas & Na Liu
2021. Potentials for grammaticalization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.