Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (2019) ► pp.497–510

Losing your footing, losing your morality

The embodied effect of physical slant on moral judgment

| Southwest University
| Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
What influences how people render their moral judgment? Focusing specifically on the conceptual metaphors “moral is upright” and “immoral is tilted”, we sought to investigate whether physical slant can influence people’s harsh moral judgment. Experiment 1 induced physical slant by having participants complete the questionnaire at a tilt table. We observed a significant effect with participants who experienced physical slant rendering a less severe moral judgment than did those who wrote their responses at a level table. Using a new manipulation of physical slant and a larger, more diverse sample, Experiment 2 asked participants to complete the questionnaires with rotated text or normal text. We observed a difference between the two groups: compared to participants who read the normal text, those with a visual experience of slant lessened the severity of their moral judgments. Taken together, the results showed that the consequence of tilted experience exerts downstream effects on moral reasoning, which suggests that incidental bodily experience affects how people render their decisions.
Keywords: embodiment, moral judgment, physical slant, conceptual metaphor, human conceptualization
Article outline
  • 1.Conceptual background
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials and procedure
    • 2.3Results and discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials and procedure
    • 3.3Results and discussion
  • 4.Generral discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00044.li
References (43)
References
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Epley, N. (2013). Disfluency prompts analytic thinking – but not always greater accuracy: response to Thompson et al. (2013). Cognition, 128 (2), 252–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., Montero-Melis, G., Damjanovic, L., Schartner, A., Kibbe, A., Riches, N., & Thierry, G. (2015). Two languages, two minds flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychological Science, 26 (4), 518–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 1, 577–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59 1, 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2 1, 396–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2008). Embodied persuasion: Fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 184–207). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Lupyan, G. (2015). All concepts are ad hoc concepts. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 543–566). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1997). Motion in the metaphorical spaces of morality and reasoning as expressed in language and gesture. International Journal of Communication, 7 1, 85–98.Google Scholar
(1998). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (2), 107–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forest, A. L., Kille, D. R., Wood, J. V., & Stehouwer, L. R. (2015). Turbulent times, rocky relationships: Relational consequences of experiencing physical instability. Psychological Science, 26 (8), 1261–1271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7 (2), 218–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59 1, 8–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2014). Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In M. Landau, M. Robinson, & B. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 17–40). Washington, DC: APA Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108 1, 814–834. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, P. L., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). The ups and downs of the moral personality: Why it’s not so black and white. Journal of Research in Personality, 43 (3), 520–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the perspective of cognitive science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J., Leliveld, M. C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2015). The Moral Self-Image Scale: Measuring and understanding the malleability of the moral self. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 1, 8–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D. (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38 (3), 726–736.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (Eds.), (2014). The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. J. (2016). Conceptual metaphor in social psychology: The poetics of everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2017). Who’s holding the moral higher ground: Religiosity and the vertical conception of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 106 1, 178–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15 (4), 243–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43 (4), 757–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: the role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42 (1), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riskind, J. H., & Gotay, C. C. (1982). Physical posture: Could it have regulatory or feedback effects on motivation and emotion?. Motivation and Emotion, 6 (3), 273–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherman, G. D., & Clore, G. L. (2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20 1, 1019–1025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, H. L., Lu, Y. Q., & Lu, Z. Y. (2016). Moral-up first, immoral-down last: The time course of moral metaphors on a vertical dimension. Neuroreport, 27 (4), 247–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063–1070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39 (7), 1257–1267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Guo, X., & Wang, X. (2017). Metaphorical representation of moral concepts: Evidence from red/white color, left/right position and upright/skew font. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49 (7), 875–885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. (2015). Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30 (3), 163–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Spatial metaphors for morality: A perspective from Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 31 (2), 108–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N., Wang, T., & He, Y. (2016). Spatial subsystem of moral metaphors: A cognitive semantic study. Metaphor & Symbol, 31 (4), 195–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313 1, 1451–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21 1, 311–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (5), 859–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

LI, HENG
2021. Time heals all wounds: analysis of changes in temporal focus and implicit space–time mappings among survivors of the 2019 China earthquake over time. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 595 ff. DOI logo
Li, Heng
2021. Philosophy in the flesh: How philosophical view of embodiment motivates public compliance with health recommendations during the COVID-19 crisis. Personality and Individual Differences 181 ► pp. 111059 ff. DOI logo
Li, Heng
2021. Living in turbulent times. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 548 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.