Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2020) ► pp. 112130
References

References

Barsalou, L.
(1992) Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clausner, T., & Croft, W.
(1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 247–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E.
(2016) Cascades in metaphor and grammar. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 214–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D.
(1999) Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, vol. 5(3), 271–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2013) Language and time. A Cognitive Linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2017) The embodied and discourse views of metaphor: Why these are not so different and how they can be brought closer together. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 319–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 129 ]
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. E.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen, (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(1995) American friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 315–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002/2010) Metaphor. A practical introduction. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering the role of context in metaphor. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Second edition. (pp. 202–251). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, de- velopments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
(2014) Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2020) Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 71, 16–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor. Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, J.
(2007) Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 445–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 130 ]
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. Where Covid metaphors come from: reconsidering context and modality in metaphor. Social Semiotics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Khachmafova, Zaineta, Tatiana Ostrovskaya, Elena Skhalyakho, D. Rudoy, A. Olshevskaya & N. Ugrekhelidze
2021. The conceptual design of oil-and-gas metaphorical terms. E3S Web of Conferences 273  pp. 11045 ff. Crossref logo
Pobegaylov, Oleg, D. Rudoy, A. Olshevskaya & N. Ugrekhelidze
2021. Digital education facing COVID - 19 pandemic: technological university experience. E3S Web of Conferences 273  pp. 08090 ff. Crossref logo
Rossi, Micaela
2021. Marc Bonhomme, Anne-Marie Paillet & Philippe Wahl (éds). 2017. Métaphore et argumentation (Paris : L’Harmattan) | Paola Paissa, Michelangelo Conoscenti, Ruggero Druetta & Martin Solly (eds). 2020. Me. Argumentation et analyse du discours :27 Crossref logo
Wen, Xu & Chuanhong Chen
2021. Cultural conceptualisations of loong (龙) in Chinese idioms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2  pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.