Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2020) ► pp.316–349

Boundary-crossing events across languages

A study on English speakers, Spanish speakers and second language learners

| University of Vigo
This study analyses how speakers of two typologically distinct first languages (English (N = 12) and Spanish (N = 16)) and a group of 19 Spanish second language learners of English express boundary-crossing events, what type of verb they use, and how they segment these motion events. The stimuli used were 12 pictures of boundary-crossing events indicating motion into, out of and over a bounded space. In task 1 participants described each of the 12 scenes freely and in task 2 they were provided with a specific Manner verb between brackets. Significant differences were found in boundary-crossing and event segmentation in both L1 and L2. Participants also differed significantly in the type of verb used in the two tasks.
Keywords: boundary-crossing, motion events, English, Spanish, learners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Motion events across languages
  • 3.Boundary-crossing across languages
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Stimuli and procedures
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Type of verb
    • 5.2Boundary-crossing
    • 5.3Event segmentation
    • 5.4Type and token analyses
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Verb types
    • 6.2Type of boundary-crossing
    • 6.3Event segmentation
    • 6.4Type/token analysis
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00062.alo
References (56)
References
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: a closer look. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso Alonso, R. (2016). Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of boundary-crossing events in L2 acquisition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(1), 161–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berthele, R. (2017). When bilinguals forget their manners. Language dominance and motion event descriptions in French and German. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 141, 39–70.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K. (2007). Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. (2004). Position and motion in Tzeltal frog stories. In S. Strömqvist & P. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 37–57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2015). Universal development and L1-L2 convergence in bilingual construal of manner in speech and gesture in Mandarin, Japanese and English. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 66–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a Second Language. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier. Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 13–50). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the Learner’s L1 make a difference? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno, Linguistic relativity in SLA. Thinking for speaking (pp.1–33). Second Language Acquisition Series. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typolo-gical perspective. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.13–49). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 Acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978). Discovering what words can do. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen & K. W. Todrys. Papers from the parasession on the lexicon. Chicago linguistics dociety April 14–15 (pp.34–57). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Cook, V., & Li, W. (2016). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution and Function. Modern Language Journal, 931, 370–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipovic, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2015). Motion. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 527–545). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 831, 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2003). Language background questionnaire. The dynamics of multilingual processing. Nijmegen. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. [URL]
Gullberg, M., & de Bot, K. (2010). Gestures in language development. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harklau, L. (2012). The role of writing in classroom language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(4), 329–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, H., & Hickman, M. (2015). Finding one’s path into another language: On the expression of boundary-crossing by Spanish learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 991, 14–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A. (2018). Acquisition of motion events in L2 Spanish by German, French and Italian speakers. The Language Learning Journal 46(3), 241–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English bilingual adults. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 9(3), 249–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004a). Motion lexicalisation in Basque. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3), 317–349.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antunano, I. (2004b). Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist & P. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 89–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2009). Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura & S. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Cross-linguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2017). Motion and semantic typology: A hot old topic with exciting caveats. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (pp. 13–38). Amsterdam & Philaelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A. (2015). New horizons in the study of motion. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessen, M. (2014). The expression of Path in L2 Danish by German and Turkish learners. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 111, 81–109.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, W. (2018). A typological approach to the encoding of motion events. In M. A. Gómez González & J. Lachlam Mackenzie. The construction of discourse as verbal interaction (pp.45–74). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S., & Stam, G. (2008). Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muñoz, M., & Cadierno, T. (2019). Mr Bean exits the garage driving or does he drive out of the garage? Bidirectional transfer in the expression of Path. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57(1), 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L., Eisenberg, A., Kako, E., Highter, M., & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: verb use by English and Spanish speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 131, 521–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, S., & Nicoladis, E. (2005). Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp. 102–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 261, 619–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçaliskan, S. (2004). Encoding the manner, path and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 73–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 361, 485–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. (1999). Learning “how to search for the frog”: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, & Turkish. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & Ch. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston university conference on language development (pp. 541–552). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2016). Multi-competence in second language acquisition:inroads into the mainstream?. In V. Cook & W. Li (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence (pp. 50–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford Quick Placement Test. (2001). University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In S. Masayoshi & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Neimeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp.107–138). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2004). The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2006). What makes manner of motion salient: explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 487–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stam, G. (2017). Verb framed, satellite framed or in between? A L2 learner’s thinking for speaking in her L1 and L2 over 14 years. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: theory and applications (pp. 329–365). Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stam, G., Lantolf, J., Buescher, K., & Smotrova, T. (2019). Explicitly teaching thinking for speaking in a second language works. Paper presented at thinking, doing, learning. University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalisation patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions. Vol 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Path to realization: A typology of event integration. Buffalo working papers in linguistics, 91(01), 147–87.Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol II. Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & S. Ozcaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp.389–402). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tilemma, M. (2012). Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on teext quality and writing processes. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verb and times. The Philosophical Review, 21, 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yanklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel: the place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 159–190). Hillsdale, NH: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Tusun, Alimujiang, Yi Wang & Adalaiti Abulajiang
2024. Moving in L2 Chinese from childhood to adulthood: Developmental and crosslinguistic factors in bilingual event construal. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Aveledo, Fraibet & Panos Athanasopoulos
2023. Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in motion event conceptualisation in bilingual speakers of Spanish and English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:1 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Becerra, Rodrigo, Jorge Osorio, Ítalo Cantarutti & Gabriel Llanquinao
2022. Motion Events in L1 and L2 Mapudungun Narratives: Typology and Cross-Linguistic Influence. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Molés-Cases, Teresa & Paula Cifuentes-Férez
2021. Translating narrative style. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.