Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2020) ► pp. 372396
References

References

Barcelona, A.
(2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 202–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerrillo, P., & Yubero, S.
(2007) Qué leer y en qué momento ‘What to read and when’. In P. Cerrillo & S. Yubero (Eds.), La formación de mediadores para la promoción de la lectura. Segunda Edición, ‘Training specialists in the promotion of reading’ (pp. 285–293). Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Evans, J.
(Ed.) (2015) Challenging and controversial picture books. Creative and critical responses to visual texts. London & New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dziallas, K.
(2019) The head and sexualized body parts as fruit and vegetables. Metaphor and the Social World, 92, 199–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Ch.
(1996) Pictorial metaphors in advertising. London & New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya-Guijarro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp. 57–74). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2014) Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal vommunication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2019) Developments in multimodal metaphor studies: A response to Górska, Coëgnarts, Porto and Romano and Muelas-Gil. In I. Navarro & I. Ferrando (Eds.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 367–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Ch., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K.
(2006) Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children’s picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles, 55, 757–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B.
(2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, J., Fairchild, E., Grauerholz, L., Pescosolido, B., & Tope, D.
(2011) Gender in twentieth-century children’s books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & Society, 25(2), 197–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moya-Guijarro, A. J.
(2013) Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 336–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) A multimodal analysis of picture books for children: A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2019) Textual functions of metonymies in Anthony Browne’s picture books: A multimodal approach. Text & Talk, 39(3), 389–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nodelman, P.
(1988) Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Painter, C., Martin, J., & Unsworth, L.
(2013) Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pinar, M. J.
(Ed.) (2013) Special Issue: Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2015) Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, E.
(2007) Missing! Picture books reflecting gay and lesbian families. Make the curriculum inclusive for all children. Young Children, 62(3),24–30.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2000) The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Diez, I. O.
(2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P.
(2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1985) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J.
(2012) Language, gender and children’s fiction. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J., & McGlashan, M.
(2012) Stories featuring two-mum and two-dad families. In J. Sunderland (Ed.), Language, gender and children’s fiction (pp. 142–172). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Villacañas, B., & White, M.
(2013) Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificación García advertising campaigns. In L. Hidalgo & B. Kraljevic (Eds.), Metaphorical creativity across modes: Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2),220–239. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yu, N.
(2009) Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 119–143). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yus, F.
(2009) Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: a unified account. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, (pp.47–172). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Picture books

Bryan, J., & Hosler, D.
(2006) The different dragon. USA: Two Lives Publishing.Google Scholar
Clay, G. A., & Krebs, L.
(2008) Why don’t I have a daddy? Bloomington: Author House.Google Scholar
De Haan, L., & Nijland, S.
(2004) King and king and family. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.Google Scholar
Newman, L., & Dutton, M.
(2011) Donovan’s big day. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.Google Scholar
Oelschlager, V., Backwood, K., & Blanc, M.
(2010) A tale of two daddies. China: Vanita Books.Google Scholar
Richardson, J., Parnell, P., & Cole, H.
(2005) And Tango makes three. New York & London: Simon and Schuster Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar