A multimodal cognitive analysis of visual metonymies in picture books featuring same-sex-parent families
Verbal metaphor and also metonymy have been theorized from a conceptual perspective since Lakoff and Johnson published
Metaphors we live by in the 1980s. However, the final years of the twentieth century saw a new approach into non-verbal
monomodal or multimodal tropes (
Forceville & Urios-Aparisi, 2009). In an attempt to expand
upon the theorization and communicative functions of visual metonymies, this study aims to explore the meaning potential of metonymic
representations of characters in a sample of six picture books which portray same-sex-parent families. A multimodal cognitive approach has
been adopted to find out whether, and if so how, metonymic representations of characters contribute to the positive portrayal and acceptance
of same-sex-parent families in children’s picture books. The results reveal that monomodal visual metonymies are essentially used to
introduce new characters in the story and highlight important aspects of the plot which boost the acceptance of non-traditional
families.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review: A multimodal cognitive approach to metonymy
- 3.The analysis of metonymic representations
- 3.1Sample texts
- 3.2Methodology
- 3.3Metonymic manifestations in the picture books featuring two-dad families
- 3.4Metonymies in picture books portraying female same-sex families
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Final remarks
- Note
-
References
-
Picture books
References (39)
References
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 202–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cerrillo, P., & Yubero, S. (2007). Qué leer y en qué momento ‘What to read and when’. In P. Cerrillo & S. Yubero (Eds.), La formación de mediadores para la promoción de la lectura. Segunda Edición, ‘Training specialists in the promotion of reading’ (pp. 285–293). Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, J. (Ed.) (2015). Challenging and controversial picture books. Creative and critical responses to visual texts. London & New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Ch. (1996). Pictorial metaphors in advertising. London & New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Ch. (2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya-Guijarro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp. 57–74). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Ch. (2014). Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal vommunication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Ch. (2019). Developments in multimodal metaphor studies: A response to Górska, Coëgnarts, Porto and Romano and Muelas-Gil. In I. Navarro & I. Ferrando (Eds.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 367–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, Ch., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamilton, M., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K. (2006). Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children’s picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles, 551, 757–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, J., Fairchild, E., Grauerholz, L., Pescosolido, B., & Tope, D. (2011). Gender in twentieth-century children’s books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & Society, 25(2), 197–226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moya-Guijarro, A. J. (2014). A multimodal analysis of picture books for children: A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moya-Guijarro, A. J. (2019). Textual functions of metonymies in Anthony Browne’s picture books: A multimodal approach. Text & Talk, 39(3), 389–413. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Painter, C., Martin, J., & Unsworth, L. (2013). Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinar, M. J. (Ed.). (2013). Special Issue: Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rowell, E. (2007). Missing! Picture books reflecting gay and lesbian families. Make the curriculum inclusive for all children. Young Children, 62(3),24–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Diez, I. O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1985). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sunderland, J. (2012). Language, gender and children’s fiction. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sunderland, J., & McGlashan, M. (2012). Stories featuring two-mum and two-dad families. In J. Sunderland (Ed.), Language, gender and children’s fiction (pp. 142–172). London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villacañas, B., & White, M. (2013). Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificación García advertising campaigns. In L. Hidalgo & B. Kraljevic (Eds.), Metaphorical creativity across modes: Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2),220–239. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, N. (2009). Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 119–143). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yus, F. (2009). Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: a unified account. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, (pp.47–172). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Picture books
Bryan, J., & Hosler, D. (2006). The different dragon. USA: Two Lives Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clay, G. A., & Krebs, L. (2008). Why don’t I have a daddy? Bloomington: Author House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Haan, L., & Nijland, S. (2004). King and king and family. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, L., & Dutton, M. (2011). Donovan’s big day. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oelschlager, V., Backwood, K., & Blanc, M. (2010). A tale of two daddies. China: Vanita Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, J., Parnell, P., & Cole, H. (2005). And Tango makes three. New York & London: Simon and Schuster Books for Young Readers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús
2024.
A multimodal analysis of character-character interaction in LGTB picture books and its educational implications.
Linguistics and Education 82
► pp. 101312 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
2023.
A bibliometric study of metaphor research and its implications (2010–2020).
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3
► pp. 227 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lirola, María Martínez
2022.
Exploring compositional meanings in the picturebook with a two-father family Me, Daddy & Dad (2017).
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 38:2
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.