Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2020) ► pp. 519534
References

References

Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E.
(2007) Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system?. Psychological Science, 18(1), 51–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, A.
(2010) Remembrances of times East: absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S., & Munafò, M. R.
(2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D.
(2009) Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G.
(2011) When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22, 419–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Henetz, T.
(2012) Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M., & Lin, C. H.
(2019) What is in your hand influences your purchase intention: Effect of motor fluency on motor simulation. Current Psychology, 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De la Fuente, J., Casasanto, D., & Santiago, J.
(2015) Observed actions affect body-specific associations between space and valence. Acta Psychologica, 156, 32–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De la Fuente, J., Casasanto, D., Martínez-Cascales, J. I., & Santiago, J.
(2017) Motor imagery shapes abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 41(5), 1350–1360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De la Fuente, J., Casasanto, D., Román, A., & Santiago, J.
(2015) Can culture influence body-specific associations between space and valence?. Cognitive Science, 39(4), 821–832. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerley, S., & Ivry, R. B.
(2001) Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6), 493–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dumas-Mallet, E., Button, K. S., Boraud, T., Gonon, F., & Munafò, M. R.
(2017) Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains. Royal Society Open Science, 4(2), 160254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, A.
(2019) The value of left and right. In Mackenzie, J. L. & Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.). Emotion in discourse (pp. 139–158). Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forth, G.
(1985) Right and left as a hierarchical opposition: Reflections on eastern Sumbanese hairstyles. In R. H. Barnes, D. de Coppet & R. J. Parkin (Eds.), Contexts and levels: Anthropological essays on hierarchy (pp. 103–116). Oxford: JASO.Google Scholar
Gebruers, N., Vanroy, C., Truijen, S., Engelborghs, S., & De Deyn, P. P.
(2010) Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(2), 288–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. R. W.
(2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granet, M.
(1973) Right and left in China, transl. by Rodney Needham. In R. Needham (Ed.), Right and left (pp. 43–58). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A.
(2010) The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R.
(1909) La prééminence de la main droite: étude sur la polarité religieuse. Revue Philosophique de la France et de L’Étranger, 68, 553–580.Google Scholar
Holmes, K. J., Alcat, C., & Lourenco, S. F.
(2019) Is emotional magnitude spatialized? A further investigation. Cognitive Science, 43(4), e12727. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jang, C. H., Yang, H. S., Yang, H. E., Lee, S. Y., Kwon, J. W., Yun, B. D., & Jeong, H. W.
(2011) A survey on activities of daily living and occupations of upper extremity amputees. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(6), 907–921. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, N., Krosnick, J., & Casasanto, D.
(2015) Moderators of candidate name-order effects in elections: An experiment. Political Psychology, 36(5), 525–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kong, F.
(2013) Space–valence associations depend on handedness: Evidence from a bimanual output task. Psychological Research, 77(6), 773–779. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A.
(2004) The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., & Cao, Y.
(2019) The body in religion: The spatial mapping of valence in Tibetan practitioners of Bön. Cognitive Science, 43(4), e12728. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loffing, F., Prelle, L., Heil, L., & Cañal-Bruland, R.
(2019) Body-specific influences on performance evaluation in realistic dynamic scenes. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 24(3), 355–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Needham, R.
(1973) Right and left: Essays in dual symbolic classification. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, D. M.
(2008) The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Østlie, K., Lesjø, I. M., Franklin, R. J., Garfelt, B., Skjeldal, O. H., & Magnus, P.
(2012) Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(4), 294–303.Google Scholar
Pitt, B., & Casasanto, D.
(2018) Spatializing emotion: No evidence for a domain-general magnitude system. Cognitive Science, 42(7), 2150–2180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P.
(2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N.
(1998) Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, X., Chen, J., & Proctor, R. W.
(2017) Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses. Acta Psychologica, 180, 33–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, X., Yi, F., Zhang, J., & Proctor, R. W.
(2019) Left is “good”: Observed action affects the association between horizontal space and affective valence. Cognition, 193, 104030. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinnen, S. P., Walter, C. B., Lee, T. D., & Serrien, D. J.
(1993) Acquiring bimanual skills: Contrasting forms of information feedback for interlimb decoupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1328.Google Scholar
Teasell, R., Bayona, N. A., & Bitensky, J.
(2005) Plasticity and reorganization of the brain post stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 12(3), 11–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veale, J. F.
(2014) Edinburgh handedness inventory–short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(2), 164–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar