Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp. 111–141

Language and cultural cognition

The case of grammatical gender in Arabic and personified gender in cartoons

| University of Bremen
| University of Sfax
In this paper, we analyze a large-scale corpus of Arab cartoons to measure the correspondence between grammatical gender in Arabic and personified gender in images. The results show that the effect is very strong for males (a near-perfect relationship between the two, grammatical and visual depiction), but the reverse is the case for females (the grammatical description is almost the opposite in perceived meaning of the graphical depiction). It can be a substantive cartoon effect. That is, there is more ambiguity in images depicting females due to some implicit cultural effect (i.e., males/gendered maleness dominates even in the text in ‘male-centric’ cultures). We look at the implications of this androcentric behavior for understanding the complex set of relationships linking language, thought, and culture. Such research will aid both gender studies and cognition scholarship based on multimodal stimuli.
Keywords: the Whorfian Hypothesis, grammatical gender, Arabic, art, personification, culture, androcentric behavior
Published online: 28 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00078.rah
References

References

Abdel-Raheem, A.
(2019a) Pictorial framing in moral politics: A corpus-based experimental study. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2019b) Moral metaphor and gender in Arab visual culture: Debunking Western myths. Social Semiotics, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Mental model theory as a model for analysing visual and multimodal discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 303–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
(2016) How gender shapes the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A.
(2011) The sociolinguistic functions of code-switching between Standard Arabic and Dialectal Arabic. Language in Society, 40, 537–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alkohlani, F. A.
(2016) The problematic issue of grammatical gender in Arabic as a foreign language. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(1), 17–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Al-Mahadin, S.
(2003) Gender representations and stereotypes in cartoons: A Jordanian case study. Feminist Media Studies, 3(2), 131–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Almutrafi, F.
(2015) Language and cognition: Effects of grammatical gender on the categorisation of objects (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Newcastle University, UK.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F.
(2019) Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 307–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, P.
(2014, August). Help for dichotomous agreement program v.3.2a. 1–36 https://​www​.pbarrett​.net​/Dichot3​/Dichot3​_2a​_program​_manual​.pdf​?cls​=file
Beckson, K., & Ganz, A.
(1975) Literary terms: A dictionary. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Beller, S., Brattebø, K. F., Lavik, K. O., Reigstad, R. D., & Bender, A.
(2015) Culture or language: what drives effects of grammatical gender? Cognitive Linguistics, 26(2), 331–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S. L.
(1993) The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bender, A., Beller, S., & Klauer, K. C.
(2011) Grammatical gender in German– a case for linguistic relativity? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(9), 1821–1835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Lady Liberty and Godfather Death as candidates for linguistic relativity? Scrutinizing the gender congruency effect on personified allegories with explicit and implicit measures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(1), 48–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Crossing grammar and biology for gender categorisations: Investigating the gender congruency effect in generic nouns for animates. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 530–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W.
(2003) Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 61–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C.
(2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., Stadthagen, H., & Vinson, D. P.
(1999) Distinguishing language from thought: Experimental evidence that syntax is lexically rather than conceptually represented. Psychological Science, 10(4), 310–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bracco, C.
(2019) The creation of the femme fatale in Egyptian cinema. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 15(3), 307–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. W., & Lenneberg, E. H.
(1954) A study in language and cognition. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(3), 454–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, D., Bywater, J., & Paul, N.
(Eds.) (2008) Place: Local knowledge and new media practice. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., Southwood, M. H., & Basilico, D.
(1999) Verbs, events, and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia, 37(4), 395–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. A., Losoff, A., McCracken, M. D., & Still, J.
(1981) Gender perception in Arabic and English. Language Learning, 31, 159–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P.
(2005) Allegory and symbol –a fundamental opposition? Language and Literature, 14, 323–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronevin, V., & Forceville, C.
(2017) From metaphor to allegory: The Japanese manga Afuganisu-tan. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(2), 235–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cortese, G., & Duszak, A.
(2005) Identity, community, discourse: English in intercultural settings. Bern & New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cutting, J.
(2000) Analysing the language of discourse communities. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J.
(2011) Personification in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, G.
(2010) Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
Dittmer, J.
(2005) Captain America’s empire: Reflections on identity, popular culture, and post-9/11 geopolitics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 626–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A., & Malti-Douglas, F.
(1994) Arab comic strips: Politics of an emerging mass culture. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. L.
(1997) Political cartoons in the 1988 presidential campaign: Image, metaphor, and narrative. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A.
(1959) Diglossia. WORD, 15(2), 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2019)  Review of the book Pictorial framing in moral politics: A corpus-based experimental study , by A. Abdel-Raheem. Journal of Language and Education, 5(1), 110–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., El Refaie, E., & Meesters, G.
(2014) Stylistics and comics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 485–499). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Göçek, F. M.
(Ed.) (1998) Political cartoons in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
(2003) Whorf meets Wierzbicka: Variation and universals in language and thinking. Language Sciences, 25(4), 393–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) (1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hämeen-Anttila, J.
(2000) Grammatical gender and its development in Classical Arabic. In B. Unterbeck & M. Rissanen (Eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition (pp. 595–608). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J.
(1999) Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low-and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. A., & Tolmie, S.
(2011) Cognitive allegory: An introduction. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 109–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A.
(1993) Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 717–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, P., Parslow, O., Ansara, Y. G., & Quick, F.
(2013) Androcentrism: Changing the landscape without leveling the playing field. In M. K. Ryan & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 29–44). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helmy, M., & Frerichs, S.
(2017) Sheherazade says no: Artful resistance in contemporary Egyptian political cartoons. In S. H. Awad & B. Wagoner (Eds.), Street art of resistance (pp. 349–376). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K.
(2009) Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215–1226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, M. H.
(1973) Grammatical gender, its origin and development. Paris: La-Hay. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Idriss, M.
(1999) The cell and the umbrella: Gender in the Arabic language. ZAL, 37, 32–53.Google Scholar
Kamel, S. A.
(2006) The textual component in classical Arabic: Investigating information structure. In S. Boudelaa (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XVI: Papers from the sixteenth annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, Cambridge, March 2002 (pp. 103–130). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M.
(2018) Draw to purpose: American women illustrators and cartoonists. Washington, DC: The University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G.
(2001) Social and linguistic stereotyping: A cognitive approach to accents. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 9, 129–145.Google Scholar
(2003) How to do things with allophones: linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In R. Dirven, R. M. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought (pp. 69–120). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landor, V. R.
(2013) Grammatical categories and cognition across five languages: The case of grammatical gender and its potential effects on the conceptualisation of objects. Doctoral dissertation. University School of Languages and Linguistics. Griffith University.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1976) Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language, 14, 307–357.Google Scholar
(1994) Culture, cognition, and grammar. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict (pp. 25–53). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P.
(1996) The Whorf theory complex: A critical reconstruction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. A.
(1992a) Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P., & Papadelos, P.
(2017) Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics, 27(1), 39–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W. D.
(1999) Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Molés-Cases, T.
(2020) On the translation of Manner-of-motion in comics: Evidence from an inter-and intratypological corpus-based study. Languages in Contrast, 20(1), 141–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., & Roivainen, E.
(2019) No grammatical gender effect on affective ratings: Evidence from Italian and German languages. Cognition and Emotion, 33(4), 848–854, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munnich, E., & Landau, B.
(2003) The effects of spatial language on spatial representation: Setting some boundaries. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 113–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nasri, C.
(2017) The liberating force of art, humor, and social media: Women cartoonists of the Arab Spring. In L. Touaf, S. Boutkhil & C. Nasri (Eds.), North African women after the Arab Spring: In the eye of the storm (pp. 53–76). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (1997) The language of emotions: Conceptualization, expression, and theoretical foundation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K.
(2013) The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17 (5), 220–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omri, M. S.
(1998) “Gulf laughter break:” Cartoons in Tunisia during the gulf conflict. In F. M. Göçek (Ed.), Political cartoons in the Middle East (pp. 133–154). Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener.Google Scholar
Pettersson, B.
(2011) Literary criticism writes back to metaphor theory: Exploring the relation between extended metaphor and narrative in literature. In M. Fludernik (Ed.), Beyond Cognitive Metaphor Theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor (pp. 94–112). (Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Stylistics; vol. 3). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinar Sanz, M. J.
(Ed) (2013) Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Special Issue of Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Procházka, S.
(2004) Unmarked feminine nouns in Modern Arabic dialects. In M. Haak, R. de Jong & K. Versteegh (Eds), Approaches to Arabic dialects. A collection of articles presented to Manfred Woidich on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 237–262). Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P.
(2004) The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. London & New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryding, K. C.
(2005) A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. New York & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadiqi, F.
(2003a) Women and linguistic space in Morocco. Women and Language, 26(1), 35–43.Google Scholar
(2003b) Women, gender and language in Morocco. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
(2006) Language and gender. In K. Versteegh (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (vol.1), (pp. 642–650). Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Said, E.
(1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Samuel, S., Cole, G., & Eacott, M. J.
(2019) Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1767–1786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.
(2015) A blueprint of the entrenchment-and-conventionalization model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 3(1), 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segel, E., & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Grammar in art. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M. C., Rodríguez, W., & Dubois, D. P.
(2002) When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 377–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaheen, J.
(1994) Arab images in American comic books. The Journal of Popular Culture, 28(1), 123–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F.
(2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language: theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Advances in cultural linguistics. Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J.
(1987) A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist, 89 (2), 295–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, No. 17. Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slyomovics, S.
(1993) Cartoon commentary: Algerian and Moroccan caricatures from the Gulf War. Middle East Report, 23(1), 21–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Sex, lies and television: Algerian and Moroccan caricatures of the Gulf War. In S. Joseph & S. Slyomovics (Eds.), Women and power in the Middle East (pp. 72–98). Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., & Pieper, K.
(2019) Inclusion in the Recording Studio? Gender and race/ethnicity of artists, songwriters, and producers across 700 Popular Songs from 2012–2018. Report from USC Annenberg, Annenberg Inclusion Initiative. http://​assets​.uscannenberg​.org​/docs​/aii​-inclusion​-recording​-studio​-2019​.pdf
Steiner, G.
(1975) After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J.
(2009) Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on pre-attentive colour perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 4567–4570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S., Hegarty, P., & Catmur, C.
(2015) Is the left hemisphere androcentric? Evidence of the learned categorical perception of gender. Laterality, 20(5), 571–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B., & Chow, T.
(2017) Language and culture in visual narratives. Cognitive Semiotics, 10 (2), 77–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T.
(2008) Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, K.
(1997) The Arabic language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K.
(2005) Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 501–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wales, K.
(2001) A Dictionary of Stylistics (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Whorf, B.
(1956) Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M., Wu, L., Wade, A., Boroditsky, L.
(2007) Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7780–7785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yaqub, E.
(1971) mawsuuʿ-at ʿuluum l-lugh-ah l-ʿarabiyy-ah ‘Arabic encyclopedia’, 8. Beirut: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah.Google Scholar