Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp. 273298
References

References

Abdul-Raof, H.
(2006) Arabic rhetoric: A pragmatic analysis. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G.
(2014) A glossary of literary terms. Nelson Education.Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. J., & Ahmed, S.
(1994) The Koran, complete dictionary and literal translation. Vancouver: M, J & S Ahmed.Google Scholar
Arberry, A. J.
(1955) The koran interpreted. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(2003) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2007) A glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M.
(2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2003) Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches En Communication, 19, 57–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 295 ]
Geeraerts, D.
(2002) The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2016) Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L.
(1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action [revised version]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997a) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1997b)  theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1595–1614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 101–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Taub, S., & Morgan, P.
(1996) Primitive and compound metaphors. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 177–187). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Irving, T. B.
(1985) The Quran. Vermont: Amana Books.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2010) Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of pragmatics, 42(1), 97–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) A view of “mixed metaphor” within a conceptual metaphor theory framework. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Makarem Shirazi, N.
(2007) Bargozide-ye Tafsir-e Nemuneh [Selection of Tafsir-e-Nemuneh] (vol. 4). Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-Eslamya. (Original in Persian)Google Scholar
[ p. 296 ]
Meisami, J. S. & Starkey, P.
(Eds.) (1998) Encyclopedia of Arabic literature. (vol. 2). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miró-Sastre, I.
(2018) Combining metaphors: From metaphoric amalgams to binary systems. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(1), 81–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monotheist Group
(2008) The Message – A translation of the Glorious Qur’an. US: Brainbow Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C.
(2016) Why mixed metaphors make sense. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naciscione, A.
(2016) Extended metaphor in the web of discourse. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noy, A.
(2018) The legacy of ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī in the Arabic East before al-Qazwīnī’s Talkhīṣ al-Miftāḥ. Journal of Abbasid Studies, 5(1–2), 11–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickthall, M.
(1930) The meaning of the glorious Koran: An explanatory translation. Quran Archive.Google Scholar
Qaraei, A.
(2003) The Qur’an with an English paraphrase. Qom: The center for translation of Holy Qur’an.Google Scholar
Qaribullah, H., & Darwish, A.
(2001) The meaning of the Glorious Koran. Online: https://​tanzil​.net​/#trans​/en​.qaribullah/.(01.09.2021).Google Scholar
Radden, G.
(2000) How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 93–108). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J.
(1979) The Conduit Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(2008) Cross-linguistic analysis, second language teaching and cognitive semantics: The case of Spanish diminutives and reflexive constructions. In S. de Knop & T. de Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 121–153). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2017) Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Ten lectures on cognitive modeling. Between grammar and language-based inferencing. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A.
(2011) Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation: Metaphoric chains. In B. E. Rebollar (Ed.), Studies in linguistics and cognition (pp. 157–185). Bern & Switzerland: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
(2014) Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Mairal, R.
(2011) Constraints on syntactic alternation: lexical-constructional subsumption in the lexical constructional model. In P. Guerrero-Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English. Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 62–82). London & Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
[ p. 297 ]
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez, L.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saffarzadeh, T.
(2001) Translation of the Holy Quran. Tehran: Cultural Institute Jahan Rayaneh Kawthar.Google Scholar
Sakkaki, S. A.
(1987) Miftah al-’ulūm [The key to the sciences], Naʼīm Zarzūr (Ed.). Beirut: Dāru-l-kitāb-ul-ʼilmīyyah. (Original in Arabic).Google Scholar
Sarwar, S. M.
(1981) The Holy Quran: Arabic text and English translation. Elmhurst: Islamic Seminary.Google Scholar
Shakir, M. H.
(1999) The Qur’an translation. Elmhurst, NY: Tahrike Tarsile Qur’an.Google Scholar
Shamisā, S.
(2014) Bayān [Eloquence]. Tehran: Mitra Publication. (Original in Persian).Google Scholar
Steen, G.
(Ed.) (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU (vol. 14). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabatabaie, M. H.
(1995) Translation of Tafsir Al-Mizan. Trans: Seyed Mohammad Bagher Musavi Hamedani. Qom: Islamic Publications Office of Teachers’ Community, Vol. 17. (Original in Persian)Google Scholar
Taftāzānī, S.
(2007) Sharh-ul-Mukhtasar [Description of Al-Mukhtasar]. Qom: Esmāīlīān publications. (Original in Arabic).Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G.
(1995) Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N.
(2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yusuf Ali, A.
(1934) The Qur’an. Text, translation and commentary. New York.Google Scholar
[ p. 298 ]