Attribute transfer
The figurative interpretation of shifted modifiers
The rhetorical trope
hypallage, here called
Attribute Transfer (AT), has been
exploited artistically and creatively since antiquity in poetic and narrative discourse, but it is also used in ordinary language.
This study focuses on modifier-noun constructions in which the prenominal modifier (attribute) is “shifted” from one position to
another – a “transfer” that triggers metonymic interpretations. AT constitutes a violation of the iconically motivated proximity
principle (
Givón 2001) according to which the conceptual and functional closeness of
linguistic units is mirrored in their morphosyntactic structure. The principle of proximity competes with metonymic motivation –
the latter prevailing at the expense of the former. An interesting structural parallelism exists between AT and the shift of the
negator
not from its “logical” position to another syntactic slot (‘neg-transportation’), which again exhibits a
violation of the proximity principle. The article concludes with some suggestions for further research, especially
cross-linguistic and typological investigations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some literary examples of Attribute Transfer
- 3.Attribute Transfer in ordinary language
- 3.1Introduction
- 3.2Compositional vs. metonymically interpreted ModN constructions
- 3.2.1Healthy person vs. healthy diet
- 3.2.2Fasting person vs. fasting test
- 3.2.3Drunken soldier vs. drunken spree: Assigning human attributes to events
- 3.2.4Quiet and relaxed cups of coffee
- 3.2.5Is a foreign correspondent a foreigner?
- 4.A conflict between two cognitive parameters: Iconicity vs. metonymy
- 5.Functions of hypallage
- 6.Conclusion and outlook
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (47)
References
Barcelona, A. (2015). Metonymy. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook
of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 143–167). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barnden, J. A. (2010). Metaphor
and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive
Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2013). Metonymy
in language, thought and
brain. Sheffield: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Branka-Rosoff, S., & Zinsmaier, T. (1998). Hypallage. In G. Ueding (Ed.), Historisches
Wörterbuch der
Rhetorik. Vol. 41. (pp.107–109). Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar, M. (2017). Metonymy
and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic
structures. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects
of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, C., & Postal, P. M. (2014). Classical
NEG raising: An essay in the syntax of negation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, M. (2008–). The
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at: [URL]
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P. (2020). Construals
of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and
Cognition, 121, 1–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dupriez, B. (1991). A
dictionary of literary devices (A. Halsall, Trans.). New York: University of Toronto Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliot, T. S. (2005). The
Waste Land and other poems. New York: Barnes & Noble.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feist, J. (2012). Premodifiers
in English: Their structure and
significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genette, G. (1972). Figures
III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, J. (1980). The
iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and
motivation. Language, 561, 515–540. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, J. (2008). In
defense of iconicity. Cognitive
Linguistics, 19(1), 35–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horn, L. R. (2006). Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook
of
pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horn, L. R. (2020). Neg-raising. In V. Déprez & M. T. Espinal (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
negation (pp. 199–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lausberg, H. (1990). Elemente
der literarischen
Rhetorik. München: Hueber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy:
Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and
communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littlemore, J. (2017). Metonymy. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 407–422). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B., Malchukov, A., & Moravcsik, E. (Eds.) (2014). Competing
motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNally, L. (2016). Modification. In M. Aloni & P. Dekker (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of formal
semantics (pp. 442–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, F. J. (2013). Goals
and methods of generative syntax. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of generative
syntax (pp. 61–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (1998). A
cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 301, 755–769. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2018). What
kind of reasoning mode is metonymy. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual
metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (Human Cognitive Processing
60) (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Posner, R. (1986). Iconicity
in syntax: The natural order of attributes. In P. Bouissac, M. Herzfeld, & R. Posner (Eds.), Iconicity:
Essays on the nature of culture. Festschrift for Thomas A. Sebeok on his 65th
birthday (pp. 305–337). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, E. (1976). The
syntax and semantics of neg-raising, with evidence from
French. Language
52
(2), 404–426. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Proust, M. (2005). In search of lost time. Vol. II: Within a budding grove. (C. K. S. Moncrieff, T. Kilmartin, & D. J. Enright. Trans.). London: Vintage Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Proust, M. (1920). À l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs. Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue Française.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G. (2021). Iconicity. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 268–296). New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (2007). Towards
a theory of metonymy. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The
cognitive linguistics
reader (pp. 335–359). London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rijkhoff, J. (2008). Descriptive
and discourse-referential modifiers in a layered model of the noun
phrase. Linguistics
46
(4), 789–829. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romoli, J. (2013). A
scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 361, 291–353. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2020). Figurative
language: Relations and constraints. In J. Barnden & A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing
figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives (Figurative Language and
Thought
10) (pp. 469–510). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2021). Conceptual
metonymy theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic
issues. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 204–227). New York & London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U. (1997). Speech
act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L. Waugh (Eds), Discourse
and perspective in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullmann, S. (1957). Style
in the French novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Virgil (1995). The
Aeneid (E. McCrorie, Trans.). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2023.
Hypallage is a rare bird. Not..
Lingua 289
► pp. 103511 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.