Review published In:
Living Metaphors and MetonymiesEdited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 298–304
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 298–304
Book review
. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Article outline
- Part I.Usage and its potential to feed into conventionalization and entrenchment. (Chapters Two through Six)
- Part II.Conventionalization. (Chapters Seven through Ten)
- Part III.Entrenchment. (Chapters Eleven through Fifteen)
- Part IV.Synopsis: The EC-Model as a complex-adaptive model. (Chapters Sixteen through Twenty)
-
References
References (8)
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language,
usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Croft, W. (2001). Radical
Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
De Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching
second language development from a dynamic systems theory
perspective. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A
dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and
techniques (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
De Smet, H. (2018). Entrenchment
effects in language change. In H-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment
and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic
knowledge (pp. 75–100). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions:
a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,
7
(5), 219–224.
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research
methods for complexity theory in Applied Linguistics. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.
Schmid, H-J. (2015). A
blueprint of the entrenchment-and-conventionalization
model. GCLA,
3
1, 3–25.
(2017). Entrenchment
and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic
knowledge. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.