Cover not available
Article published In:
Applying Embodied Cognition and Cognitive Linguistics to language teaching
Edited by Paolo Della Putta and Ferran Suñer
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1] 2023
► pp. 115–139
Regular articles

The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political discourse

ORCID logo | Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R.E. Alekseev
The study investigated metonymic uses of the anthroponym ‘Assad’, the acronyms ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and the toponymic adjective ‘European’ from a blending theory perspective. The corpus comprised British and American politicians’ speeches covering such topics as the activity of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the fight against ISIS, and Euromaidan. Analysis of the data revealed that the source domain of a metonymic expression which has certain cognitive salience in an utterance fuses with the target leading to the emergence of a blend. It was also found that the construction of a metonymic blend in proper names often requires activation of world knowledge which forms part of the conceptual structure of the source or target domains of a proper name.
Keywords: proper name, conceptual integration, metonymy, cognitive salience, blend
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Metonymy, cognitive salience and conceptual integration
  • 5.Conceptual integration in proper names
    • 5.1The anthroponym ‘Assad’ and the acronyms ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’ and ‘Daesh’
    • 5.2The toponymic adjective ‘European’
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Sources
Published online: 30 January 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00129.gol
References (61)
References
Alač, M., & Coulson, S. (2004). The man, the key, or the car: Who or what is parked out back? Cognitive Science Online, 2 1, 21–34.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In A. Barcelona, R. Benczes & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–58). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berberović, S. (2009). Would you like to be the Michael Jordan of Linguistics? Construction of figurative meaning of personal names. In M. Brdar, M. Omazić & T. Pavičić (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to English: Fundamental, methodological, interdisciplinary and applied aspects (pp. 173–200). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Biernacka, E. (2013). A discourse dynamics investigation of metonymy in talk. PhD thesis. The Open University.
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2013). Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Brdar, M. (2020). Review of the book Metonymy in language, thought and brain by B. Bierwiaczonek. Jezikoslovje, 21(2), 237-248.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabo, R. (2007). When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Or some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. In G. Radden, K-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 125–142). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (2005). Manipulation, memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf. In L. de Saussure & P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse, language, mind (pp. 5–45). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2003). Metonymy and conceptual blending. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 51–79). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. (2009). Genitives and proper names in constructional blends. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics. (pp. 161–184). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Encyclopaedia Britannica: Meme. [URL]
Encyclopaedia Britannica: Regime. [URL]
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998/2001). Conceptual integration networks. Expanded web version, 10 February 2001. [URL] Original version published in Cognitive Science, 2 (20), 133–187.
(2003). Metaphor, metonymy and binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 133–148). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fregni, S., Heidlmayr, K., Weber, K., & Peeters, D. (2019). An exploratory fMRI study on metonymy and metaphor processing. Retrieved from [URL]
Gibbs, R. (1994). Process and products in making sense of tropes. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.252–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrero-Ruiz, J. (2018). Exaggerating and mitigating through metonymy: The case of situational and CAUSE FOR EFFECT/EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymies. Language and Communication, 62 1, 51–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Góralczyk, I., & Paszenda, J. (2017). The proper name Misiewicz as Nomen Appellativum in the current political discourse in Poland. Acta Neophilologica, XIX (2), 65–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1997). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the 5th international cognitive linguistics conference (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ioannou, G. (2019). Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 20 (1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R., Hoffman, P., Pobric, G., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2016). The semantic network at work and rest: Differential connectivity of anterior temporal lobe subregions. Journal of Neuroscience, 36 (5), 1490–1501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (2007). The philosophy of grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jonasson, K. (1994). Le nom propre. Constructions et interprétations. Collection champs linguistique. Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions Duculot. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, A. Th. (2018). What lies beneath: The revelatory power of metonymy in discourse, language planning, and higher education. PhD thesis. The University of Arizona.
Krzeszowski, T. (1997). Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Volume 21. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S. (1989). Proper names in communication. Journal of Linguistics, 25 1, 355–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markert, K., & Nissim, M. (2007). Metonymic proper names: a corpus based account. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 152–174). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. (1974). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp.211–277). McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. (2017). Metaphor and metonymy in language and thought: A cognitive linguistic approach. SYNTHESIS PHILOSOPHICA, 64 1, 271–294.Google Scholar
Radden, G. (2018). Molly married money. Reflections on conceptual metonymy. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy. Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 161–182). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–61). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapp, A., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Bartels, M., & Markert, K. (2011). Neural correlates of metonymy resolution. Brain and Language, 119 1, 196–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7 1, 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (1997). Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 6 (2), 161–178.Google Scholar
(2003). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In A. Barcelona, R. Benczes & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–125). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A. (2011). Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3 (1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sjöblom, P. (2016). A cognitive approach to the semantics of proper nouns. In S. Brendler (Ed.), Cognitive onomastics: A reader (pp. 63–82). Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Stolk, A., Noordzij, M. L., Verhagen, L., Volman, I., Schoffelen, J-M., Oostenveld, R., Hagoort, P. &, Toni, I. (2014). Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning. PNAS, 111 (51), 18183–18188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thothathiri, M., Kim, A., Trueswell, A. K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). Parametric effects of syntactic-semantic conflict in Broca’s area during sentence processing. Brain and Language, 120 1, 259–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tchesnokov, I. (2003). The concept EUROPE in linguistic consciousness of Russian students. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 3 1, 69–72.Google Scholar
Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Theory and typology of proper names. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sources
Ash, T., Gunn, J., Lough, J., Lutsevych, O., Nixey, J., Sherr, J., & Wolczuk, K. (2017). The struggle for Ukraine. Chatham House report. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Baer, D., 24 February, 2016. Oleksandra Matviychuk receives the Democracy Defender Award. [URL]
Brzezinski, I., 10 April, 2014. Prepared statement. Transatlantic security challenges: Central and Eastern Europe. Hearing before the subcommittee on European affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, the US Senate, 113 Congress, Second session, pp. 41. [URL]
Cameron, D., 16 July, 2015. Eid 2015: David Cameron’s message. [URL]
, 6 March, 2014. EU meeting on Ukraine: David Cameron’s speech. [URL]
, 7 September, 2015. Syria: refugees and counter-terrorism. Prime Minister’s statement. [URL]
Hammond, Ph., 30 September, 2015. The Assad regime created the environment in which extremism and ISIL in particular flourished. [URL]
Glynn, J., 16 January, 2018. Department of Defense press briefing by Brig. Gen. Glynn via teleconference from Baghdad, Iraq. [URL]
May, Th., 20 September, 2017. PM speech at UNGA: Preventing terrorist use of the Internet. [URL]
McGurk, B., 8 July, 2017. Press conference by special presidential envoy McGurk in Baghdad, Iraq. [URL]
Shields, J., 25 January, 2017. Baroness Shields opening speech at the global counter-terrorism forum. [URL]
Obama, B., 10 September, 2014. Statement by the President on ISIL. [URL]
Pompeo, M., 10 January, 2019. A force for good. America reinvigorated in the Middle East. [URL]
Tillerson, R., 22 March, 2017. Remarks at the ministerial plenary for the global coalition working to defeat ISIS. [URL]