Article published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 21:2 (2023) ► pp.411–443
economy is human
A corpus-based comparative study in English and Chinese economic media discourse
Utilizing the framework of Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory (ECMT), this paper presents a corpus-based multi-level comparative study of the economy is human metaphor in English and Chinese economic media discourse. While the results indicate a considerable sharing of their respective conceptual structures of “human body”, “human condition” and “human relationship”, they do reveal some differences in terms of their preference and the associated metaphorical expressions. The similarities detected can possibly be attributed to the similar body, physiological function and social attributes all human beings share, which then work as the source for drawing inferences about the economy. The differences however are also likely to be derived from the different saliences of human experience which characterize the English and Chinese social-cultural contexts. Another possible explanation for these differing culturally-sourced linguistic metaphors may well be media language and its idiosyncratic stylistic features.
Keywords: corpora, economic media discourse, multi-level comparative study, Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.Research design
- 3.1Research questions
- 3.2Corpus data
- 3.3Research procedure
- A.Metaphor identification and annotation
- B.Metaphor categorization and calculation
- 3.4Reliability
- 4.Results and analysis
- 4.1Conceptual frames within human domain
- 4.2Inference pattern
- 4.2.1Frame HUMAN BODY
- 4.2.2Frame human condition
- 4.2.3Frame human relationship
- 4.3Linguistic level
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (42)
Arrese, Á., & Vara-Miguel, A. (2016). A comparative study of metaphors in press reporting of the Euro crisis. Discourse & Society,
27
(2), 133–155. 
Burns, A., & Mitchell, W. C. (1946). Measuring business cycles. New York: NBER.
Castaño, E., Verdaguer, I., Laso, N. J., & Ventura, A. (2014). Economy is a living organism: Metaphorical expressions in a learner corpus of English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics,
27
(2), 323–337.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J., & Ennis, T. (2001). A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes,
20
(3), 249–266.
Charteris-Black, J., & Musolff, A. (2003). ‘Battered hero’ or ‘innocent victim’? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes,
22
(2), 153–176.
Chung, S.-F. (2008). Cross-linguistic comparisons of the MARKET metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,
4–2
1(2008), 141–175.
Chung, S.-F., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2003). Economy is a person: A Chinese-English corpora and ontological-based comparison using the conceptual mapping model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Research on Computational Linguistics Conference XV.
Deignan, A. (1995). Collins Cobuid English Guides 7: Metaphor. London: HarperCollins.
(2003). Metaphorical expressions and culture: An indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol,
18
(4), 255–271.
(2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics (Vol. 61). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2010). The cognitive view of metaphor: Conceptual metaphor theory. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 44–56). London & Oakville: Equinox.
Deignan, A., Gabryś, D., & Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT journal,
51
(4), 352–360.
Dorst, A. G. (2011). Personification in discourse: linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and literature,
20
(2), 113–135.
Fauconnier, G. (2007). Mental Space. In D. Geeraert & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 371–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
Fu, H. (2000). The Zhou book of change. Shandong: Shandong Friendship Press.
Fukuda, K. (2009). A comparative study of metaphors representing the US and Japanese economies. Journal of Pragmatics,
41
(9), 1693–1702.
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London and New York: Routledge.
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphor and primary scenes. (Ph.D). University of California, Berkeley.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: Mcgraw-hill.
Hu, C., & Xu, Y. (2017). A comparative study of ECONOMY metaphor based on Chinese and English media corpus. Foreign Language Teaching,
38
(5), 38–43.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Klamer, A., McCloskey, D. N., & Solow, R. M. (1988). The consequence of economic rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kramsch, C. (2003). Metaphor and the subjective construction of beliefs. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA (pp. 109–128). Berlin: Springer.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
McCloskey, D. N. (1995). Metaphor economists live by. Social Research,
2
1, 215–227.
Mirowski, P. (1991). More heat than light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol,
22
(1), 1–39.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Trends in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wang, H., Runtsova, T., & Chen, H. (2013). Economy is an organism–A comparative study of metaphor in English and Russian economic discourse. Text & Talk,
33
(2), 259–288.
Williams, A. E. (2013). Metaphor, media, and the market. International journal of communication,
7
1, 1404–1717.
Yu, N., & Huang, J. (2019). Primary metaphors across languages: Difficulty as weight and solidity. Metaphor and Symbol,
34
(2), 111–126.
Yu, N., Yu, L., & Lee, Y. C. (2017). Primary metaphors: Importance as size and weight in a comparative perspective. Metaphor and Symbol,
32
(4), 231–249.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Hu, Chunyu, Aoran Zhang & Yilin Xu
2024. Metaphor, Stance, and Identity: A Corpus-Based Study of CEO Letters in Chinese and American Corporate Social Responsibility Reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 67:1 ► pp. 47 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.