Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First ArticlesA mental spaces analysis of religious identity discourse
Religious identity is often viewed as a relatively stable construct, reflecting an individual’s personal worldview. However, individuals living within modern multi-cultural societies often must engage in extensive reflection to orient themselves to faith traditions in ways that are coherent and personally relevant. Although some work has examined the connection between narratives of religious experience, identity and cognition (cf. Richardson, 2012; Richardson & Nagashima, 2018; Richardson & Mueller, 2019), the relationship between thinking and speaking about this identity is still a developing area of enquiry, with important consequences for how religious faith and practice are understood. This article presents a detailed analysis of an interview with a UK-based Jewish woman based on the mental spaces (Fauconnier, 1994) and conceptual blending (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002) frameworks. The analysis shows how mental spaces and the relationship between elements within those spaces emerge over the course of a discourse event so as to constitute a personal account of religious identity. The concluding section furthermore discusses how within- and across-space contrast links are utilized, along with general processes of compression and decompression, to develop a blend that dynamically expresses the interviewee’s religious identity as an integrated and coherent position lying between competing attractor states.
Keywords: mental spaces, blending, cognition, religion, identity, discourse analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and background
- 2.Method
- 3.Analysis
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
-
References
References (28)
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (vol. 1: Attachment). NY: Basic Books.
Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
(2012). Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. NY: Routledge.
(2015). Embracing connectedness and change: A complex dynamic systems perspective for applied linguistic research. AILA Review,
28
(1), 28–48.
Chatman, S. (1990). Coming to terms: The rhetoric of narrative in fiction and film. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language,
53
(4), 594–628.
Conway, M. A., & Jobson, L. (2012). On the nature of autobiographical memory. In D. Bernsten & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 54–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier, B. (2004). Identity and perspective: The Jekyll-and-Hyde effect in narrative discourse. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 363–376). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
(2005). Blending and narrative viewpoint: Jonathan Raban’s travels through mental spaces. Language and Literature,
14
(2), 99–127.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. NY: Basic Books.
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. F. (2010). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 313–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hougaard, G. R. (2008). “Mental spaces” and “blending” in discourse and interaction: A response. In T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 247–250). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics,
37
(10), 1555–1577.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 63–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier & E. E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 91–123). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dam & Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Richardson, P. (2012). A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World,
2
(2), 233–261.
Richardson, P., & Mueller, C. M. (2019). Moving yet being still: Exploring source domain reversal and force in explanations of enlightenment. Language and Cognition,
11
(2), 310–339.
Richardson, P., Mueller, C. M., & Pihlaja, S. (2021). Cognitive linguistics and religious language: An introduction. NY: Routledge.
Richardson, P., & Nagashima, M. (2018). Perceptions of danger and co-occurring metaphors in Buddhist dhamma talks and Christian sermons. In Cognitive Linguistic Studies (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 133–154). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schechtman, M. (1996). The constitution of selves. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol,
28
(1), 41–59.
Strawson, G. (2004). Against narrativity. Ratio,
17
(4), 428–452.
Turner, M. (2014). The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, Q., & Conway, M. A. (2004). The stories we keep: Autobiographical memory in American and Chinese middle-aged adults. Journal of Personality,
72
(5), 911–938.