Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Figurativeness of the Japanese flag

A multilevel analysis of the Japan 2011 earthquake distress relief posters

| Adam Mickiewicz University
The analysis offered in this article applies the multilevel approach to conceptual metaphor to relief posters, created and distributed widely after the massive Japan 2011 earthquake. The aim of the analysis is to show in what way the multilevel approach to metaphor can be used to illustrate how the figurative meaning of relief posters emerges from the interactions between different levels of schematicity: from basic image schemas and domains, through contextually embedded semantic frames, finishing with metaphorical scenarios at the highest level of specificity and complexity. The present analysis also shows the potential applicability of image schemas as the guiding analytical element, serving as the departure point for the unfolding metaphorical and metonymical interpretation of a multimodal message. Accordingly, it has been shown how the image schemas of part-whole, full-empty, process and force aid the analysis of metaphoricity and how the central metonymic element of the national flag co-constructs the figurative reading of the posters.
Keywords: multilevel approach to metaphor, conceptual metaphor, metonymy, distress relief posters
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Relief posters and humanitarian communication
  • 2.Levels of schematicity in metaphor
  • 3.Metaphor-metonymy cline
  • 4.Corpus
  • 5.Identification procedure
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Part-whole image schema
    • 6.2Full-empty image schema
    • 6.3Process image schema
    • 6.4Force image schema
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00202.dyr
References (58)
References
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2017). Decoding images: Toward a theory of pictorial framing. Discourse & Society, 28 (4), 327–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J.. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics 21(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony: figurative framing. Communication Theory, 26 (4), 410–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2011). Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy on post-conflict conversations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24 (2), 63–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (1998). STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (2), 107–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, A. (2023). The role of mental spaces in building metaphors: The case study of the “flądra” nickname in polish. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 42 (2), 79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denroche, C. (2015). Metonymy and language: A new theory of linguistic processing. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Deregowski, J. B. (1971). Symmetry, gestalt and information theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23 (4), 381–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyrmo, T. (2022a). Gestural metaphorical scenarios and coming out narratives. Metaphor and the Social World, 12 (1), 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022b). A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze 24(4), 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023a). Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics, 24 (1), 94–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023b). Levels of metaphor in gesture. Pragmatics and Cognition, 30 (2), 330–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2024). Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing. Multimodal Communication, 13 (2), 117–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. J. (2017). From image schema to metaphor in discourse: The force schemas in animation films. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor (pp. 239–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2022). Metaphorical experience: Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20 (1), 7–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Chen, E. (2018). Metaphor and the automatic mind. Metaphor and the Social World, 8 (1), 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (3), 323–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2021). Animals vs. armies: Resistance to extreme metaphors in anti-immigration discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 20 (2), 226–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaskulowski, K. (2016). The magic of the national flag. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39 (4), 557–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juniper, A. (2011). Wabi sabi: The japanese art of impermanence. Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Kazemian, R., Rezaei, H., & Hatamzadeh, S. (2022). Unraveling the force dynamics in conceptual metaphors of COVID-19: A multilevel analysis. Language and Cognition, 14 (3), 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keulemans, G. (2016). The Geo-cultural Conditions of Kintsugi . The Journal of Modern Craft, 9 (1), 15–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (4), 663–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The metaphor–metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (2), 75–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28 (2), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Some consequences of a multi-level view of metaphor. In I. Navarro I. Ferrando (Ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 19–34). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020a). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). Visual metaphor in Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 7 (1), 13–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). Extended conceptual metaphor theory: The cognition-context interface. In U. Schröder, M. Mendes De Oliveira & A. M. Tenuta (Eds.), Metaphorical conceptualizations (pp. 23–40). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Metaphorical creativity in discourse. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 47 (1), 54–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2024). Proverbs in Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In S. Belkhir (Ed.), Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics: State of the art (pp. 26–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, T. P. (1993). The axiological parameter in preconceptional image schemata. In R. A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (pp. 307–330). De Gruyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (1), 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., Arizono, S., & May, A. (2016). The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14 (1), 51–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (2008). On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 21 (2), 207–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mennan, Z. (2009). From simple to complex configuration: Sustainability of gestalt principles of visual perception within the complexity paradigm. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 26 (2), 309–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2018). Distance crossing and alignment in online humanitarian discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 124 1, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, M. D. (2022). Cross-cultural communication in a crisis: The universality of visual narrative in the Covid-19 pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2021). National conceptualisations of the body politic: Cultural experience and political imagination. Singapore: Springer Singapore. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). Universality and/or cultural specificity of metaphors and analogies? NATIONS as BODIES/PERSOONS. In S. Wuppuluri & A. C. Grayling (Eds), Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities (pp. 401–419). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B., & David D. Clarke. (2000). Semantic fields and frames: Historical explorations of the interface between language, action, and cognition. Journal of Pragmatics 32 1, 125–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nie, Y., & Chen, R. (2008). WATER metaphors and metonymies in Chinese: A semantic network. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16 (3), 492–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olszewska, E., Dyrmo, T., Fabiszak, M. (under review). Where you start is what you get: Schema-driven vs discourse-driven metaphor analysis.
Peña, M. S. (2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (6), 1041–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosh, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11, 303–322.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12 (1), 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tse, C.-S., Huang, Y., Zeng, T., Zhou, Y., & Chan, Y.-L. (2021). The influence of congruency proportion, target eccentricity, and valence strength on the spatial-valence metaphoric congruency effect in a word valence judgment task. Psychological Research, 85 (7), 2610–2635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, A. (2013). Humanitarian appeal and the paradox of power. Critical Discourse Studies, 10 (4), 444–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodin, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Placing abstract concepts in space: Quantity, time and emotional valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1, 2169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar