References (50)
References
Adams, K. L., & Concklin, N. (1973). Toward a theory of natural classification. Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 9 1 (pp. 1–10). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C. (1988). The story of over: Polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. Garland Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 8 (4), 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2002). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (2008). Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua, 118 (2), 141–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö., & Fraurud, K. (1996). Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim, & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Reference and referent accessibility (pp. 47–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, P. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estaji, A. (2009). Numeral classifiers in Persian. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 1 1, 94–108.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15 (2), 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, L. (2018). Accounting for *yek ta in Persian. In A. Korangy & C. Miller (Eds.), Trends in Iranian and Persian linguistics (pp. 213–232). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Wilson, N. L. (2002). Bodily action and metaphorical meaning. Style, 36 (3), 524–540.Google Scholar
Gil, D. (2005). Numeral classifiers. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryder, D. Gil & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 226–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2005). The languages of East and Southeast Asia: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, C. (2004). Classifiers. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan & S. Skopeteas (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (pp. 1016–1031). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Günter, R., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther & R. Günter (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Her, O., Hammarström, H., & Allassonnière-Tang, M. (2022). Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world. Linguistics Vanguard, 8 (1), 151–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeremiás, E. (1984). Diglossia in Persian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 34 (3–4), 271–287.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2007). Polysemy, prototypes, and radial categories. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mache, A. (2012). Numeral Classifiers in Persian. Muenchen: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Mahootian, S. (1997). Persian. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newman, J. (1996). Give: A cognitive linguistic study. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K., & Thornburg, L. (2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2022). Two types of plurals and numeral classifiers in classifier languages: The case of Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31 1, 139–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y. & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17 (3), 269–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1973a). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4 1, 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1973b). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Soltani, R., & Janda, L. A. (2024). From bare bones to a numeral classifier: The case of Persian faqare. [Manuscript submitted for publication].Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (2005). The acquisition of numeral classifiers: The case of Japanese children. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, M. (2006). Agency and impersonality: Their linguistic and cultural manifestations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. (2017). English quasi-numeral classifiers: A corpus-based cognitive-typological study. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpora and tools
AleAhmad, A.‎, Amiri, H.‎, Darrudi, E, Rahgozar, M.‎, & Oroumchian, F.‎ (2009)‎.‎ Hamshahri: A standard Persian text collection.‎ Knowledge-Based Systems, 22 (5)‎, 382–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc (4.2.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL].Google Scholar
Rasooli, M., Kouhestani, M., & Moloodi, A. (2013). Development of a Persian syntactic dependency. Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 306–314). Atlanta, Georgia: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sabouri, S., Rahmati, E., Gooran, S., & Sameti, H. (2022). Naab: A ready-to-use plug-and-play corpus for Farsi. Retrieved from arXiv: [URL].Google Scholar