Review published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 10:1 (2012) ► pp.227–232
Book review
. Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011. 284 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-2382-1
Reviewed by
References (12)
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T. (2005). Euphemisms in the language of politics or how metonymy opens one door but closes the other. In P. Cap (ed.), Pragmatics Today (pp. 287–299). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Lakoff, G. (2006). Thinking Points: Communicating our American Values and Vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1993). Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. 
Panther, K. -U. & Thornburg, L. (1998). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 755–776.
(eds.). (2003). Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Panther, K. -U., Thornburg, L. & Barcelona, A. (eds.). (2009). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (1999). Implicatures, explicatures, and conceptual mappings. In J. L. Cifuentes (ed.), Estudios de Lingüística Cognitiva (pp. 429–440). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.
Seto, K. (1999). Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In K. -U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2003). Metonymic polysemy and its place in meaning extension. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman & D. D. Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language (pp. 195–214). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th. (eds.). (2006). Corpus-Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.