Review published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 10:1 (2012) ► pp.227–232
Book review
. Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011. 284 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-2382-1
Reviewed by
References
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T.
(2005) Euphemisms in the language of politics or how metonymy opens one door but closes the other. In P. Cap (ed.), Pragmatics Today (pp. 287–299). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Lakoff, G.
(2006) Thinking Points: Communicating our American Values and Vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1993) Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. 
Panther, K. -U. & Thornburg, L.
(1998) A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 755–776.
Panther, K. -U., Thornburg, L. & Barcelona, A.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(1999) Implicatures, explicatures, and conceptual mappings. In J. L. Cifuentes (ed.), Estudios de Lingüística Cognitiva (pp. 429–440). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.
Seto, K.
(1999) Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In K. -U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2003) Metonymic polysemy and its place in meaning extension. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman & D. D. Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language (pp. 195–214). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
(eds.) (2006) Corpus-Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.