Review published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 13:1 (2015) ► pp. 257261


Booij, G.E
(2010) Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Busse, U.
(2002) Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J., & Traugott, E.C
(2003) Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Delfs, L.
(2004) The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Early Modern English. www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora​/PPCEME​-RELEASE​-1.
Kroch, A., & Taylor, A.
(2000) The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. 2nd edn. PPCME2.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., & Raumolin-Brunberg, H.
(2003) Historical sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nurmi, A., Taylor, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S., & Nevalainen, T.
(2006) The parsed corpus of Early English correspondence, tagged version. Compiled by the CEEC project team. University of York and University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H., & Nevalainen, T.
(2007) From mine to my and thine to thy: The loss of the nasal in the first and second person possessives. In U. Smit, S. Dollinger, J. Hüttner, G. Kaltenböck, & U. Lutzky (Eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation (pp. 303–314). Vienna: Braumuller.Google Scholar
Schendl, H.
(1997) Morphological variation and change in Early Modern English: my/mine, thy/thine . In R. Hickey & S. Puppel (Eds.), Language history and linguistic modeling: A festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday (pp. 179–191). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar