Review published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 13:1 (2015) ► pp.257–261
Book review
. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. xiv+233 pp. ISBN 9781107013483
Reviewed by
References (11)
Booij, G. E. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Busse, U. (2002). Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Delfs, L. (2004). The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Early Modern English. [URL]
Kroch, A., & Taylor, A. (2000). The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. 2nd edn. PPCME2.
Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nevalainen, T., & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (2003). Historical sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
Nurmi, A., Taylor, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S., & Nevalainen, T. (2006). The parsed corpus of Early English correspondence, tagged version. Compiled by the CEEC project team. University of York and University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Raumolin-Brunberg, H., & Nevalainen, T. (2007). From mine to my and thine to thy: The loss of the nasal in the first and second person possessives. In U. Smit, S. Dollinger, J. Hüttner, G. Kaltenböck, & U. Lutzky (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation (pp. 303–314). Vienna: Braumuller.
Schendl, H. (1997). Morphological variation and change in Early Modern English: my/mine, thy/thine
. In R. Hickey & S. Puppel (eds.), Language history and linguistic modeling: A festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday (pp. 179–191). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.