The aim of this paper is to investigate how evidentials are used to reflect the unprepared mind of the speaker. Lexical evidentials are typically used by speakers to encode the kinds of evidence they have for making statements about states, events and actions they did not personally witness or were a part of. However, under certain conditions evidentials can be used to express the surprise of the speaker. This is known in the literature under the label mirativity. The empirical factors that condition the mirative use of an evidential are first determined, and then using an information and schema-theoretic analysis it is shown that mirativity is the linguistic reflex of a series of mental events involving the processing of new information, coupled with other contextual factors involving speaker knowledge.
(2004) Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aksu-Koç, A., & Slobin, D
(1986) A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes XX, (pp. 159–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bar-Hillel, Y., & Carnap, R
(1953) An outline of a theory of semantic information. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel .
Barwise, J., & Seligman, J
(1997) Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beaver, D., & Clark, B
(2008) Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chafe, Wallace L., & Nichols, J
(Eds.) (1986) Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, Advances in Discourse Processes XX. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
(2000) Why ‘first/non-first person’ is not grammaticalized mirativity. In Proceedings of als2k, the 2000 conference of the australian linguistic society.
Davis, C., Potts, C., & Speas, M
(2007) The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. In M. Gibson & T. Friedman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Conference on semantics and linguistic theory, (pp. 71–88). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Davis, H., Matthewson, L., & Rullmann, H
(2009) A unified modal semantics for out-of-control in St’át’imcets. In L. Hogeweg, H. de Hoop, & A. Malchukov (Eds.), Proceedings of the tamtam conference.
(1990) Notes on evidentiality in Hare. International Journal of American Linguistics, 56(1), 152–158.
(1992) The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Havniensia, 251, 39–62.
(1997) Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected infor- mation. Linguistic Typology, 11, 33–52.
(2001) The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 369–382.
(2010) Quantity implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2000) Dialekt und erzählungen von shigatse. In D. Schuh (Ed.), Beiträge zur tibetischen erzählforschung 13. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
(2001) An empathy-based approach to to the decription of the verb system of the Dege dialect of Tibetan. Linguistic of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 24(1), 1–34.
Itti, L., & Baldi, P.F
(2005) A principled approach to detecting surprising events in video. In Proceedings of ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (cvpr) (pp. 631–637). San Siego, CA.
Izard, C.E., & Malatesta, C.Z
(1987) Perspectives on emotional development I: Differential emotions theory of early emotional development. In Handbook of infant development (pp. 494–554). New York: Wiley.
(1997) The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Proceedings of salt, vii1, 222–239.
(1964) A grammar of the washo language. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.
(2002) Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1974) Logic and language. In M. Bloomfield & E. Haugen (Eds.), Language as a human problem (pp. 187–196). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
(2011) Evidentiality and temporal distance learning. In A. Chereches, N. Ashton, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistics theory (salt), 211, 95–114.
(1991) Modality. In D. Wunderlich & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 639–656). Berlin: de Gruyter.
(2003) Evidentiality in Qiang. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality, Typological Studies in Language 54, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1999) Pour une terminologie rigoureuse: Quelques principes et propositions. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistic de Paris, (6), 111–133.
Lorini, E. & Cristiano C
(2007) The cognitive structure of surprise: looking for basic principles. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 26(1), 133–149.
Macedo, C.A., Reisenzein, R., Lorini, L., & Castelfranchi, C.L
(2009) Artificial surprise. In J. Vallverdú & D. Casacuberta (Eds.), Handbook of research on syn- thetic emotions and sociable robotics: New applications in affective computing and artificial intelligence (pp. 267–291). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
(1984) Mind and body. New York: Norton.
McCready, E., & Norry O
(2007) Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(2), 147–206.
(2008) Information, knowledge and confirmation holism. In A. Briggle, P. Brey, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy (collected essays). IOS Press.
Meyer, W.-U., & Niepel, M
(1994) Surprise. In Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 31, California: Academic press.
Meyer, W-U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A
(1997) Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251–274.
(1986) The bottom line: Chinese Pidgin Russian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes XX (pp. 239–257). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schötzwohl, A
(1994) Temporal characteristics of the surprise reaction induced by schema discrepant visual and auditory events. Cognition and Emotion, 8(5), 433–452.
2006Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y., & Han, C
(2007) Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition, 1031, 253–299.
(2010a) Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Gitksan at the semantics-pragmatics interface. University of British Columbia dissertation.
(2010b) Examining the mirative and non-literal uses of evidentials. In T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence from evidentiality, Vol. 281, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.
(2012) The role of the ordering source in Gitksan modals. In E. Bogal-Allbritten (Ed.), Proceedings of sula 6: Semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Peterson, T., & U. Sauerland
(Eds.) (2010) Evidence from evidentiality, Vol. 281. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.
Portner, P., & Zanuttini, R
(2005) Nominal exclamatives in english. In R. Stainton &R. Elugardo (Eds.), Ellipsis and non-sentential speech, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (pp. 57–67). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
(2000) The subjective experience of surprise. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Reisenzein, R., Meyer, W.-U
., & Schützwohl, A. (1996) Reactions to surprising events: A paradigm for emotion research. In N.H. Frijda (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th conference of the international society for research on emotions (pp. 292–296). Toronto: ISRE.
(2011) Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(5), 411–442.
(2001a) Evidentiality, Part I. GLOT International, 51, 3–11.
(2001b) Evidentiality, Part II. GLOT International, 51, 161–168.
(1984) Schemata and the cognitive system. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 11 (pp. 161–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1984) On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(1998) Surprise and schema strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(5), 1182–1199.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.