Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aksu-Koç, A., & Slobin, D. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes XX, (pp. 159–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bar-Hillel, Y., & Carnap, R. (1953). An outline of a theory of semantic information. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel [1964].
Barwise, J., & Seligman, J. (1997). Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beaver, D., & Clark, B. (2008). Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, Advances in Discourse Processes XX. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curnow, T. (2000). Why ‘first/non-first person’ is not grammaticalized mirativity. In Proceedings of als2k, the 2000 conference of the australian linguistic society.
Davis, C., Potts, C., & Speas, M. (2007). The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. In M. Gibson & T. Friedman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Conference on semantics and linguistic theory, (pp. 71–88). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davis, H., Matthewson, L., & Rullmann, H. (2009). A unified modal semantics for out-of-control in St’át’imcets. In L. Hogeweg, H. de Hoop, & A. Malchukov (Eds.), Proceedings of the tamtam conference.
DeLancey, S. (1990). Notes on evidentiality in Hare. International Journal of American Linguistics, 56(1), 152–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, S. (1992). The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Havniensia, 251, 39–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected infor- mation. Linguistic Typology, 11, 33–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 369–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Egerod, S. & Hansson, I.L. (1974). An Akha conversation on death and funeral. Acta Orientalia, 361, 225–284.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ekman, P. (1980). Asymmetry in facial expression. Science, 2091, 833–834. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, M. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford dissertation.
Faller, M. (2003). Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua. In Proceedings of semantics of the under-represented languages of the americas 2. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Floridi, L. (2011). Semantic conceptions of information. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2011 edn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haller, F. (2000). Dialekt und erzählungen von shigatse. In D. Schuh (Ed.), Beiträge zur tibetischen erzählforschung 13. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Häsler, K. (2001). An empathy-based approach to to the decription of the verb system of the Dege dialect of Tibetan. Linguistic of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 24(1), 1–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Itti, L., & Baldi, P.F. (2005). A principled approach to detecting surprising events in video. In Proceedings of ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (cvpr) (pp. 631–637). San Siego, CA.
Izard, C.E., & Malatesta, C.Z. (1987). Perspectives on emotional development I: Differential emotions theory of early emotional development. In Handbook of infant development (pp. 494–554). New York: Wiley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Izvorski, R. (1997). The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Proceedings of salt, vii1, 222–239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobsen, W. (1964). A grammar of the washo language. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kagan, J. (2002). Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan, E.L. (1974). Logic and language. In M. Bloomfield & E. Haugen (Eds.), Language as a human problem (pp. 187–196). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koev, T. (2011). Evidentiality and temporal distance learning. In A. Chereches, N. Ashton, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistics theory (salt), 211, 95–114.
Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In D. Wunderlich & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 639–656). Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, R. (2003). Evidentiality in Qiang. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality, Typological Studies in Language 54, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, G. (1999). Pour une terminologie rigoureuse: Quelques principes et propositions. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistic de Paris, (6), 111–133.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorini, E. & Cristiano C. (2007). The cognitive structure of surprise: looking for basic principles. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 26(1), 133–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macedo, C.A., Reisenzein, R., Lorini, L., & Castelfranchi, C.L. (2009). Artificial surprise. In J. Vallverdú & D. Casacuberta (Eds.), Handbook of research on syn- thetic emotions and sociable robotics: New applications in affective computing and artificial intelligence (pp. 267–291). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body. New York: Norton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCready, E., & Norry O. (2007). Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(2), 147–206. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKinlay, S. (2008). Information, knowledge and confirmation holism. In A. Briggle, P. Brey, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy (collected essays). IOS Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, W.-U., & Niepel, M. (1994). Surprise. In Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 31, California: Academic press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, W-U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21(3), 251–274. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, J. (1986). The bottom line: Chinese Pidgin Russian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes XX (pp. 239–257). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schötzwohl, A. (1994). Temporal characteristics of the surprise reaction induced by schema discrepant visual and auditory events. Cognition and Emotion, 8(5), 433–452. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, F. 2006. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y., & Han, C. (2007). Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition, 1031, 253–299. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, T. (2010a). Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Gitksan at the semantics-pragmatics interface. University of British Columbia dissertation.
Peterson, T. (2010b). Examining the mirative and non-literal uses of evidentials. In T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence from evidentiality, Vol. 281, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, T. (2012). The role of the ordering source in Gitksan modals. In E. Bogal-Allbritten (Ed.), Proceedings of sula 6: Semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, T., & U. Sauerland (Eds.). (2010). Evidence from evidentiality, Vol. 281. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Portner, P., & Zanuttini, R. (2005). Nominal exclamatives in english. In R. Stainton &R. Elugardo (Eds.), Ellipsis and non-sentential speech, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (pp. 57–67). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisenzein, R. (2000). The subjective experience of surprise. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisenzein, R., Meyer, W.-U., & Schützwohl, A. (1996). Reactions to surprising events: A paradigm for emotion research. In N.H. Frijda (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th conference of the international society for research on emotions (pp. 292–296). Toronto: ISRE.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rett, J. (2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(5), 411–442. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, J. (2001a). Evidentiality, Part I. GLOT International, 51, 3–11.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, J. (2001b). Evidentiality, Part II. GLOT International, 51, 161–168.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, D.E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 11 (pp. 161–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scherer, K.R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schützwohl, A. (1998). Surprise and schema strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(5), 1182–1199. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speas, M. (2008). On the syntax and semantics of evidentials. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), 940–965. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Temürcü, C. (2007). A semantic framework for analyzing tense, aspect, and mood – an application to the ranges of polysemy of -xr, -dir, -iyor and -∅ in Turkish. Universiteit Antwerpen dissertation.
Wiklund, A.-L. (2009). The syntax of surprise: Unexpected event readings in complex predication. Working papers in scandinavian syntax 841, 181–224.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, R., & Portner, P. (2003). Exclamative clauses: At the syntaxsemantics interface. Language, 79(1), 39–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)