Cover not available
Article published In:
Expressing and Describing Surprise
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 415–435

Surprise routines in scientific writing

A study of French social science articles

Emotions are almost absent from scientific articles except surprise, which plays a specific role in this genre. Surprise markers such as contrairement à nos attentes (‘contrary to our expectations’) or ce résultat relativement surprenant (‘this somewhat surprising result’) are used in the framework of a scientific prediction model, implicit or explicitly formulated. A corpus linguistic study of adjectival and verbal markers allows us to determine several trends: (a) contrary to other genres such as novels or newspaper articles, surprise is not polar, that is to say it is neither positive nor negative, but stylistically “neutral”, (b) surprise is far more source-oriented than experiencer-oriented, (c) surprise generally involves the reader as a witness, and contributes, with other rhetorical markers, to “interlocutive” dialogism, (d) surprise often occurs in a prefabricated discursive scenario including several steps: (i) prediction model, (ii) observed facts, (iii) expression of surprise (or absence of surprise), (iv) explanation of surprising facts. Finally, we can question the status of surprise as an affect in scientific writing. It seems to be more a state of consciousness associated with the observation of complex facts. In any case, it appears to be a complex state, with rich conceptual content.

Keywords: surprise, stance, scientific writing, emotions
Published online: 31 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.06tut
References
Augustyn, M., Ben Hamou, S., Bloquet, G., Goossens, V., Loiseau, M., & Rinck, F
(2008) Constitution de ressources pédagogiques numériques: Le lexique des affects. In M. Loiseau, M. Abouzaïd, L. Buson, C. Cavalla, A. Djauron, C. Dugua, et al. (Eds.), Autour de la langue et du langage: Perspective pluridisciplinaire (pp. 407–414). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Boch, F., Grossmann, F., & Rinck, F
(2007) Conformément à nos attentes: Les marqueurs de convergence/divergence dans l’article de linguistique. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 2(12), 109–122. URL : [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boch, F., & Rinck, F
to appear). Anaphores démonstratives dans les écrits d’étudiants de Master. Comparaison avec les pratiques expertes. Linx.
Caffi, C., & Janney, R.W
(1994) Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3), 325–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celle, A., & Lansari, L
(2014) ‘I’m surprised’ / ‘Are you surprised?’ Surprise as an argumentation tool in verbal interaction. In P. Blumenthal, I. Novakova, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Les émotions dans le discours / Emotions in discourse (pp. 267–277). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T
(2006) Academic voices across languages and disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J
(2003) Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, F., & Tutin, A
(2010a) Evidential Markers in French Scientific Writing: the Case of the French Verb voir . In E. Smirnova & G. Diewald (Eds.), Evidentiality in European languages (pp. 167–197). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010b) Les marqueurs verbaux de constat: Un lieu de dialogisme dans l’écrit scientifique. Actes du colloque Dialogisme: langue, discours 2010, 8–10 septembre 2010. Montpellier, Praxiling. [URL].
Grossmann, F., Tutin, A., & Garcia Da Silva, P
(2009) Filiation et transfert d’objets scientifiques dans les écrits de recherche. Pratiques, 143/1441, 187–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, F., & Wirth, F
(2007) Marking evidentiality in scientific papers: The case of expectation markers. In K. Fløttum (Ed.), Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse (pp. 202–218). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hartwell, L., & Jacques, M.-P
(2014) Authorial presence in French and English: ‘Pronoun + verb’ patterns in biology and medicine research articles. Discours, 151.Google Scholar
Hyland, K
(1998) Hedging in scientific research articles. Amtserdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 1091–1112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kern, B., & Grutchus, A
(2014)  Surprise vs étonnement: Comportement discursif et perspectives contrastives. In P. Blumenthal, I. Novakova, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Les émotions dans le discours / Emotions in discourse (pp. 187–198). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Micheli, R
(2010) L’émotion argumentée: L’abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français. Paris: Éd. du Cerf.Google Scholar
Novakova, I., Goossens, V., & Grossmann, F
(2013) Interactions entre profil discursif et structures actancielles: l’exemple des verbes de surprise et de respect. Langue Française, 41, 31–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novakova, I., & Sorba, J
(2013)  Stupéfier et jalouser dans les séquences textuelles journalistiques: Quel profil discursif pour quelle stratégie argumentative? Le discours et la langue, 4(1), 203–220.Google Scholar
(2014) L’émotion dans le discours. À la recherche du profil discursif de stupeur et de jalousie . In P. Blumenthal, I. Novakova, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Les émotions dans le discours / Emotions in discourse (pp. 161–173). Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collin, A
(1999) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piolat, A., & Bannour, R
(2009) EMOTAIX: Un scénario de tropes pour l’identification automatisée du lexique émotionnel et affectif. Année psychologique, 109(4), 655–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plantin C
(2011) Les bonnes raisons des émotions: Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours émotionné. Bern: Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, N
(1994) Être ou ne pas être un verbe de sentiment. Langue française, 1031, 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J., & Burke, A
(2003) “It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. In P. Leistyna & C.F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tutin, A
(2010)  Dans cet article, nous souhaitons montrer que…: Lexique verbal et positionnement de l’auteur dans les articles en sciences humaines. Lidil. Revue de linguistique et de didactique des langues, 411, 15–40.Google Scholar
Tutin, A., & Grossmann, F
(Eds) (2014) L’écrit scientifique: Du lexique au discours. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chen, Lang & Guangwei Hu
2020. Mediating Knowledge through Expressing Surprises: A Frame-based Analysis of Surprise Markers in Research Articles across Disciplines and Research Paradigms. Discourse Processes 57:8 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Lang & Guangwei Hu
2020. Surprise markers in applied linguistics research articles: A diachronic perspective. Lingua 248 ► pp. 102992 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Guangwei & Lang Chen
2019. “To our great surprise …”: A frame-based analysis of surprise markers in research articles. Journal of Pragmatics 143 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Qian & Guangwei Hu
2022. What surprises, interests and confuses researchers? A frame-based analysis of knowledge emotion markers in research articles. Lingua 279 ► pp. 103426 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.