Review published In:
Expressing and Describing SurpriseEdited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 507–514
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 507–514
Book review
. Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. ISBN 9789027259226
Reviewed by
References (10)
Butler, C. (2006). On functionalism and formalism: A reply to Newmeyer. Functions of Language, 13(2), 197–227. 
Haspelmath, M. (2000). Why can’t we talk to each other? Review of Newmeyer (1998). Lingua, 110(4), 235–255.
Lakoff, G. (1991). Cognitive versus generative linguistics: How commitments influence results. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 53–62.
Newmeyer, F. J. (1991). Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 3–28.
(1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
(2005). Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nuyts, J. (2005). Brothers in arms? On the relations between functional and cognitive linguistics. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez & M. S. Peňa Carvel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 69–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007). Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 543–565). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2011). Pattern versus process concepts of grammar and mind. In M. Brdar, S. T. Gries, & M. Žic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 47–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, S. A. (1991). On addressing functional explanation in linguistics. Language & Communication, 11(1–2): 93–96.