Review published in:
Expressing and Describing Surprise
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 507514
References

References

Butler, C.
(2006) On functionalism and formalism: A reply to Newmeyer. Functions of Language, 13(2), 197–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2000) Why can’t we talk to each other? Review of Newmeyer (1998). Lingua, 110(4), 235–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1991) Cognitive versus generative linguistics: How commitments influence results. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 53–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J.
(1991) Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language form and language function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
(2005) Brothers in arms? On the relations between functional and cognitive linguistics. In F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez & M.S. Peňa CarvelEds. ( Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 69–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007) Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 543–565). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Pattern versus process concepts of grammar and mind. In M. Brdar, S.T. Gries, & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 47–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.A.
(1991) On addressing functional explanation in linguistics. Language & Communication, 11(1–2): 93–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar