Cover not available
Article published In:
Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 136–160

The role of force dynamics and intentionality in the reconstruction of L2 verb meanings

A Danish-Spanish bidirectional study

| University of Zaragoza
| University of Southern Denmark
| University of East Anglia
This paper examines the role of force dynamics and intentionality in the description of placement events by two groups of native speakers of typologically and genetically different languages, Danish and Spanish, and by two groups of intermediate adult learners, Danish learners of L2 Spanish and Spanish learners of L2 Danish. The results of the study showed that (a) force dynamics and intentionality are important semantic components in both languages, but their distribution and relative focus differed cross-linguistically, and (b) the two learner groups had difficulties in reconstructing the meanings of the L2 verbs involving these two semantic components. Learning difficulties were observed when moving from a less to a more complex L2 system, when moving in the opposite direction, i.e., from a more to a less complex L2 system and when moving to an L2 system that is as complex as the learners native one.
Keywords: Spanish, L2, placement events, force dynamics, Danish
Published online: 7 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.06iba
References (37)
Aldenderfer, M.S., & Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F.K., & Levinson, S.C. (Eds.). (2007). The typology and semantics of locative predication: Posturals, positionals and other beasts [Special Issue]. Linguistics, 45(5/6), 847–871.Google Scholar
Andics, A. (2012). The semantic role of agentive control in Hungarian placement events. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 183–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M., Gullberg, M., Majid, A., & Narasimhan, B. (2004). Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field manual: Volume 9 (pp. 10–24). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. (2012). Multicompetence and native speaker variation in clausal packaging in Japanese. Second Language Research, 281, 415–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language. In M. Achard & S. Neimeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 13–49). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 237–275). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A. (2016). Semantic categorization of placement verbs in L1 and L2 Danish and Spanish. Language Learning, 66(1), 191–223. DOI logo
Gómez Torrego, L. (1992). Valores gramaticales del se. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2009). Reconstructing verb meaning in a second language: How English speakers of L2 Dutch talk and gesture about placement. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 222–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 166–188). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filipović, L. (2013). Constructing causation in language and memory: Implications for access to justice in multilingual interactions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 201, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A. (2015). Acquisition of motion events in L2 Spanish by German, French and Italian speakers. Language Learning Journal, 1–26. DOI logo
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Las lenguas románicas y la tipología de los eventos de movimiento. Romanische Forschungen, 125(4), 467–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2012). Placement and removal events in Basque and Spanish. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 123–143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ijaz, H. (1986). Linguistic and cognitive determinants of lexical acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 361, 401–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A. (2012). Semantic granularity of placement and removal expressions in Polish. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 327–346). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B. (Eds.). (2012). Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C., & Brown, P. (2012). Put and take in Yéli Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 273–295). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B., & Sloman, S.A. (2013). Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, R. (1999). A media voz. Problemas conceptuales del clítico se. México: UNAM.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, B. (2012). Putting and taking in Tamil and Hindi. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 201–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B., Kopecka, A., Bowerman, M., Gullberg, M., & Majid, A. (2012). Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nouaouri, N. (2012). The semantics of placement and removal predicates in Moroccan Arabic. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 99–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, L. (2012). Take it up, down, and away: Encoding placement and removal in Lowland Chontal. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 297–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N.C. (2008). Conclusion: Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction – issues for research. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489–545). New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M.R.L., Johnson, C.R., & Scheffczyk, J. (2010). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. [URL]. Accessed 13/01/2015.
Saji, N., & Imai, M. (2013). Evolution of verb meanings in children and L2 adult learners through reorganization of an entire semantic domain: The case of Chinese carry/hold verbs. Scientific Studies of Reading, 171, 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-López, C. (Ed.). (2002). Las construcciones con se. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Soares da Silva, A. (2007). Verbs of letting: Some cognitive and historical aspects. In N. Delbecque & B. Cornille (Eds.), On interpreting construction schemas: From action and motion to transitivity and causality (pp. 171–200). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R., Bowen, J., & Martin, J. (1965). The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 171, 480–519.
Viberg, Å. (1998). Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical acquisition: The case of language-specific semantic differentiation. In K. Haastrup & Å. Viberg (Eds.), Perspectives on lexical acquisition in a second language (pp. 175–208). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Cadierno, Teresa, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano & Alberto Hijazo-Gascón
2023. Reconstructing the expression of placement events in Danish as a second language. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Nicoladis, Elena & Helena Hong Gao
2022. How bilinguals refer to Mandarin throwing actions in English. International Journal of Bilingualism 26:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Cadierno, Teresa
2017. Chapter 10. Thinking for speaking about motion in a second language. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Filipović, Luna
2017. Chapter 14. Applying language typology. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 399 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.