Article published in:
Applying Cognitive Linguistics: Figurative language in use, constructions and typology
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Rafael Alejo-González
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1] 2016
► pp. 185208
References
Arias Oliveira, R.
(2012) Boundary-crossing: Eine Untersuchung zum Deutschen, Französischen und Spanischen [Boundary-crossing: A study of German, French and Spanish]. PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
(1989) Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.
(Eds.) (1994) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R.
(2004) The typology of motion and posture verbs: A variationist account. In B. Kortmann (Ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 93–126). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2006) Ort und Weg: Die sprachliche Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, H.
(2006) A frame-semantic approach to identifying syntactically relevant elements of meaning. In P. Steiner, H. Boas, & S. Schierholz (Eds.), Contrastive studies and valency: Studies in honor of Hans Ulrich Boas (pp. 119–149). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Braiter, P.
(1997) Hobbit albo tam i z powrotem [The hobbit or there and back again]. Warsaw: Amber.Google Scholar
Cardini, F.E.
(2008) Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P.
(2010) The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion verb lexicons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 233–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(1997) Cognitive semantics and the Polish dative. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duden dictionary on-line
retrieved 30 April, 2015, from http://​www​.duden​.de/.
Fábregas, A.
(2007) An exhaustive lexicalisation account of directional complements. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics, 34(2), 165–199.Google Scholar
Figueroa, M.
(1982) El hobbit [The hobbit]. Barcelona: Minotauro.Google Scholar
Filip, H.
(2003) Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 11(1), 55–101.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
(2007) Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, W., & Barz, I.
(1992) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2010) Pfad und Bewegung im gesprochenen Deutsch: Ein kollostruktionaler Ansatz [Path and motion in spoken German: A collostructional approach]. In E. Ruigendijk, T. Stolz, & J. Trabant, (Eds.). Linguistik im Nordwesten [Linguistics in Northwest] (pp. 103–115). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Harr, A.K.
(2012) Language-specific factors in first language acquisition: The expression of motion events in French and German. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoijer, H.
(1954) The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. In H. Hoijer (Ed.), Language in culture: Conference on the interrelations of language and other aspects of culture (pp. 92–105). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2003) What translation tells us about motion: A contrastive study of typologically different languages. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 151–176.Google Scholar
(2004) Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven, (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 89–111). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Filipović, L.
(2013) Lexicalisation patterns and translation. In A. Rojo & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (pp. 251–282). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A.
(2012) Variation in motion events: Theory and applications. In L. Filipović & K. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity (pp. 349–373). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L.
(2007) Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language, 31, 607–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolehmainen, L.
(2005) Präfix- und Partikelverben im Deutsch-Finnischen Kontrast [Prefixed and particle verbs in German-Finnish contrast]. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Kopecka, A.
(2010) Motion events in Polish: Lexicalization patterns and the description of Manner. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (pp. 225–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krege, W.
(1998) Der Hobbit [The hobbit]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Levin, B.
(1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, W.
(2010) Questioning the universality of deictic oppositions: COME and GO in Polish, Spanish and other languages. In I. Navarro & A. Silvestre (Eds.), Language systems and cognitive perspective (pp. 75–92). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
(2014a) La alternancia locativa en castellano y polaco: Un análisis tipológico-construcional [The locative alternation in Spanish and Polish: a typological-constructional analysis ]. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
(2014b) The locative alternation in verb-framed vs. satellite-framed languages: A corpus study of Spanish and Polish. Studies in Language, 38(4), 864–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, W., & Mateu, J.
(2014) A constructional analysis of unselected objects in Polish: The case of prze- . Linguistics, 52, 1195–1236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A.
(2001) German double particles as preverbs: Morphology and conceptual semantics. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Oxford dictionary of British and World English
retrieved 30 April, 2015, from http://​www​.oxforddictionaries​.com.
Przybylska, R.
(2006) Schematy wyobrażeniowe a semantyka polskich prefiksów czasownikowych [Image schemas and the semantics of verbal prefixes in Polish]. Krakow: Universitas.Google Scholar
Ricca, D.
(1993) I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica [Deictic motion verbs in Europe: A cross-Linguistic study]. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar
Sapir, E.
(1928) The unconscious patterning of behavior in society. In E. Dummett (Ed.), The Unconscious: A symposium (pp. 114–142). New York: A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Scherf, W.
(1957) Kleiner Hobbit und der große Zauberer [Little hobbit and the big wizard]. Recklinghausen: Paulus-Verlag.Google Scholar
Skibniewska, M.
(1960) Hobbit, czyli tam i z powrotem [The hobbit or there and back again]. Warsaw: Iskry.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.
(1987) Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 13, 435–444.
(1991) Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
(2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2005) Relating narrative events in translation. In D. Ravid & H. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 115–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in language: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D., & Hoiting, N.
(1994) Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 20, 487–505.
Slobin, D., Ibarrexte-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A.
(2014) Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 701–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L.
(Eds.) (2004) Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y.
(2005) Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 31, 299–310.
Talmy, L.
(1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 17, 480–519.
(2000) Towards a cognitive semantics II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B.
(1956) Language, mind, and reality. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality (pp. 246–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Alonso, Rosa Alonso
2018. Translating motion events into typologically distinct languages. Perspectives 26:3  pp. 357 ff. Crossref logo
Fagard, Benjamin & Anetta Kopecka
2021. Source/Goal (a)symmetry. Studies in Language 45:1  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2018.  In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296],  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2020. Bilingual patterns of path encoding: A study of Polish L1-German L2 and Polish L1-Spanish L2 speakers . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
LEWANDOWSKI, WOJCIECH
2021. Variable motion event encoding within languages and language types: a usage-based perspective. Language and Cognition 13:1  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Jaume Mateu
2020. Motion events again: Delimiting constructional patterns. Lingua 247  pp. 102956 ff. Crossref logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers. Second Language Research 37:1  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Molés-Cases, Teresa
2020. Manner salience and translation: A case study based on a multilingual corpus of graphic novels. Lebende Sprachen 65:2  pp. 346 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.