Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 15:1 (2017) ► pp. 133
References

References

Addison, C.
(1993) From literal to figurative: An introduction to the study of simile. College English, 55(4), 402–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aisenman, R. A.
(1999) Structure mapping and simile-metaphor preference. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 14(1), 45–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernárdez, E.
(2009) Comparaciones explícitas con wie en Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften, de Robert Musil: Una aproximación cognitiva. Revista de Filología Alemana, anejo I, 57–72.Google Scholar
Black, M.
(1979) More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–43). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(1999) Metaphor comprehension: From comparison to categorization. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 90–95). Vancouver, BC: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, L., & Brandt, P. A.
(2005) Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 31, 216–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bredin, H.
(1998) Comparisons and similes. Lingua, 1051, 67–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D., & Kennedy, J.
(2000) Are metaphors elliptical similes? Journal of Pshycholinguistic Research, 29(4), 371–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D., Kennedy, J., & Chiappe, P.
(2003) Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics, 311, 51–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, M. J., & Romano, M.
(2013) Similes in interaction: Beyond (metaphor and) compare. Paper presented at the 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference . Edmonton (Canada), June 23–28, 2013.
Cuenca, M. J.
(2015) Beyond compare: Similes in interaction. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(1), 140–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.
(1988) Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann, (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. J.
(1988) Figuratively speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fromilhague, C.
(1995) Les figures de style. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 71, 155–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F.
(2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3/4), 223–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givon, T.
(2001[1985]) Syntax, Vol I: A functional – typological introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C. (2006) On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind & Language, 21(3), 360–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B.
(1990) Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 971, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Israel, M., Riddle Harding, J., & Tobin, V.
(2004) On simile. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language culture, and mind (pp. 123–135). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. T.
(1996) Comprehension of metaphors and similes: A time reaction study. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(2), 145–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol.1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moder, C. L.
(2012) Two puzzle pieces: Fitting discourse context and constructions into cognitive metaphor theory. In B. Dancygier, J. Sanders, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.) Textual choices in discourse: A view from Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 157–183). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A.
(Ed.) (1993[1979]) Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierini, P.
(2007) Simile in English: From description to translation. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 291, 21–43.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R.
(2007) Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roncero, C., Kennedy, J., & Smyth, R.
(2006) Similes on the Internet have explanations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 74–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H. J.
(2014), Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions collocations patterns (pp. 239–293). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Searle, J.
(1979) Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K.
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A.
(1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 841, 327–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, A.
(2007) Interpretative diversity explains metaphor-simile distinction. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(4), 291–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Are similes and metaphors interchangeable?
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given
2022.  In Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Hooshang Khoshsima, Nahid Yarahmadzehi & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2019. The Impact of Metaphorical Prime on Metaphor Comprehension Processes. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:3  pp. 375 ff. Crossref logo
Lehmann, Claudia
2021. About as boring as flossing sharks: Cognitive accounts of irony and the family of approximate comparison constructions in American English. Cognitive Linguistics 32:1  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Roncero, Carlos, Roberto G. de Almeida, Laura Pissani & Iola Patalas
2021. A metaphor is not like a simile: reading-time evidence for distinct interpretations for negated tropes. Metaphor and Symbol 36:2  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Zhou, Shiqing
2021.  In Application of Intelligent Systems in Multi-modal Information Analytics [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1234],  pp. 349 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.