Cover not available
Article published In:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 15:1 (2017) ► pp.83–101

Figures and the senses

Towards a definition of synaesthesia

| University of Genova
It is usually taken for granted that synaesthesia (e.g., sweet voice) is a metaphor. However, the fact that partly different interpretations have also been proposed suggests that further research is needed. Based on a critical review of the alternative positions on the topic and on a detailed analysis of relevant data, I argue in this paper that synaesthesia (in both its conventional and living instances) is indeed a metaphor, displaying a conflict between separate sensory concepts that cannot be connected in terms of a consistent conceptual relationship. The clearer and more explicit account of synaesthesia proposed in this paper in turn fosters clearer understanding of (a) the relationship with other figures that can involve the senses, such as metonymy, hypallage, and simile, and (b) the possible role of (multi)sensory perceptual experience in conditioning association preferences in linguistic synaesthesia (e.g., loud colour vs. a less likely to occur coloured loudness).
Keywords: synaesthesia, perception, metaphor, metonymy, hypallage, simile
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor and metonymy from the perspective of conceptual conflict
  • 3.The “default” view: Synaesthesia as metaphor
  • 4.Other views: Synaesthesia, metonymy, and experience
    • 4.1Synaesthesia as metonymically motivated metaphor (Barcelona, 2000b, 2008)
    • 4.2The role of experiential contiguity (Dirven, 1985)
    • 4.3The monosemy view (Rakova, 2003; Paradis & Eeg-Olofsson, 2013)
  • 5.Synaesthesia and its interaction with other figures
    • 5.1Metonymy
    • 5.2Hypallage
    • 5.3Simile
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 4 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.04str
References (57)
References
Anderson, E. R. (1998). A grammar of iconism. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1016–1031. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2000a). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2000b). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008). Metonymy is not just a lexical phenomenon: On the operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse. In C. Alm-Arvius, N. Johannesson, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival (pp. 3–42). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2014). Bibliography of metaphor and metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available electronically at: [URL]
Bruhn, M. J. (Ed.). (2011a). Exchange values: Poetics and cognitive science. Special Issue of Poetics Today, 32(3/4).Google Scholar
(2011b). Harmonious madness: The poetics of analogy at the limits of blending theory. In M. J. Bruhn (Ed.), Exchange values: Poetics and cognitive science. Special Issue of Poetics Today, 32(3/4), 619–662.Google Scholar
Calvert, G., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (Eds.). (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Casati, R., Dokic, J., & Le Corre, F. (2014). Distinguishing the commonsense senses. In M. Matthen, D. Stokes, & S. Biggs (Eds.). Perception and its modalities (pp. 462–479). Oxford: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of sense: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Day, S. (1996). Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 21, 32.Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (1985). Metaphor as a basic means for extending the lexicon. In W. Paprotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought (pp. 85–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dombi, E. (1974). Synaesthesia and poetry. Poetics, 3(3), 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, F., Peña Cervel, M. S., & Pérez Hernández, L. (Eds.). (2013). Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the contemporary theory of metaphor: Recent developments and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
Howes, D. (2011). The senses: Polysensoriality. In F. E. Mascia-Lees (Ed.), A companion to the anthropology of the body and embodiment (pp. 435–450). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D., Allison, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2013). The prevalence of synaesthesia: The consistency revolution. In J. Simner & E. M. Hubbard (Eds.), Oxford handbook of synesthesia (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Le Guern, M. (1973). Sémantique de la métaphore et de la métonymie. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Legallois, D. (2012). Penser les relations entre synesthésies perceptuelles et synesthésies linguistiques: quelques repères et notes. La Tribune Internationale des Langues Vivantes, 52/531, 64–73.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1990). Synaesthesia: Perception and metaphor. In F. Burwick & W. Pape (Eds.), Aesthetic illusion: Theoretical and historical approaches (pp. 28–40). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Synesthesia, then and now. Intellectica, 551, 47–80.Google Scholar
Marotta, G. (2012). Sinestesie tra vista, udito e dintorni: Un’analisi semantica distribuzionale. In M. Catricalà (Ed.), Sinestesie e monoestesie: Prospettive a confronto (pp. 19–51). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Mendelson, D. (1984). Synaesthetic metaphor in the work of Isaak Babel. Russian Literature, 15(3), 347–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nudds, M. (2011). The senses as psychological kinds. In F. MacPherson (Ed.), The senses: Classic and contemporary philosophical perspectives (pp. 311–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Malley, G. (1957). Literary synesthesia. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15(4), 391–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paillard, M. (2002). From figures of speech to lexical units: An English-French contrastive approach to hypallage and metonymy. In B. Altenberg & S. Granger (Eds.), Lexis in contrast: Corpus-based approaches (pp. 175–185). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paissa, P. (1995). La sinestesia: Storia e analisi del concetto. Brescia: La Scuola.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (2015). Conceptual spaces at work in sensuous cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In F. Zenker & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2013). Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popova, Y. (2005). Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In B. Hampe & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 395–420). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prandi, M. (2012). A plea for living metaphors: Conflictual metaphors and metaphorical swarms. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 148–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Conceptual conflicts in metaphor and figurative language. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakova, M. (2003). The extent of the literal: Metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Brang, D. (2013). From molecules to metaphor: Outlooks on synesthesia research. In J. Simner & E. M. Hubbard (Eds.), Oxford handbook of synesthesia (pp. 999–1021). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception though and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Ronga, I., Bazzanella, C., Rossia, F., & Iannetti, G. (2012). Linguistic synaesthesia, perceptual synaesthesia, and the interaction between multiple sensory modalities. Pragmatics & Cognition, 20(1), 135–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosiello, L. (1963). Le sinestesie nell’opera poetica di Montale. Rendiconti, 71, 3–21.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Aisenman, R. (2008). ‘Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter’: Synaesthesia and cognition. Language and Literature, 17(2), 101–121.Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Cohen, M. (1998). How come silence is sweet but sweetness is not silent: A cognitive account of directionality in poetic synaesthesia. Language and Literature, 7(2), 123–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simner, J. & Hubbard, E. M. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford handbook of synesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, F. (2015a). Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Functions of Language, 22(1), 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Synesthésies: Croisements des sens entre langage et perception. L’Information Grammaticale, 1461, 25–31.Google Scholar
(2016). Synaesthetic metaphors in translation. Studi e Saggi Linguistici (Italian Linguistic Studies), 54(1), 43–70.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic categorization (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1957). Style in the French novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, A. H. (1952). Synaesthesia in twentieth-century Hungarian poetry. The Slavonic and East European Review, 30(75), 444–464.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2005). The smell of greenness: Cultural synaesthesia in the Western Desert. Etnofoor, 18(1), 61–77.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2003). Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32(1), 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Q. & Huang, C. R. (2015). A corpus-based study on synaesthetic adjectives in Modern Chinese. In Q. Lu & H. Gao (Eds.), Chinese lexical semantics: 16th Workshop, CLSW 2015, Beijing, China, May 9–11, 2015, Revised selected papers (pp. 535–542). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (29)

Cited by 29 other publications

Tóth, Máté
2024. A case for metonymic synesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing, Yunfei Long, Xiaotong Jiang, Zhongqing Wang, Chu-Ren Huang & Guodong Zhou
2024. Linguistic synesthesia detection: Leveraging culturally enriched linguistic features. Natural Language Processing ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Galac, Ádám & Daler Zayniev
2023. Paths of linguistic synesthesia across cultures. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2 ► pp. 450 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Sobrino, Paula & Samantha Ford
2023. What counts as a multimodal metaphor and metonymy? Evolution of inter-rater reliability across rounds of annotation. Language and Cognition 15:4 ► pp. 786 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Francesca Strik-Lievers
2023. Semantic distance predicts metaphoricity and creativity judgments in synesthetic metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2022. Analogical and Non-analogical Resemblance in Figurative Language: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020. Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication 71 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2024. Metaphor as a resemblance phenomenon. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Jo, Charmhun
2022. Linguistic Synesthesia in Korean: Universality and Variation. Sage Open 12:3 DOI logo
Jo, Charmhun
2024. Linguistic synesthesia in language contact: Sino-Korean vs. native Korean synesthetic compounds. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, Françoise Gallez & Manon Hermann
2022. The causal frame as a motivating factor of figurative meaning. In Cognition and Contrast, ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Siahaan, Poppy
2022. Indonesian basic olfactory terms: more negative types but more positive tokens. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo & Mahesh Srinivasan
2022. Why is Semantic Change Asymmetric? The Role of Concreteness and Word Frequency and Metaphor and Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 37:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Zawisławska, Magdalena
2022. Review of Winter (2019): Sensory Linguistics: Language, Perception and Metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing, Kathleen Ahrens & Chu-Ren Huang
2022. Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: a lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 553 ff. DOI logo
Coschignano, Serena
2021. The semantic network of temperature. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Kumcu, Alper
2021. Linguistic Synesthesia in Turkish: A Corpus-based Study of Crossmodal Directionality. Metaphor and Symbol 36:4 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Bolognesi, Marianna & Francesca Strik Lievers
2020. How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising. Visual Communication 19:4 ► pp. 431 ff. DOI logo
Ginter, Anna
2020. Metafory synestezyjne w opisach doznań zapachowych we współczesnym języku rosyjskim (na podstawie wpisów na blogach o tematyce perfumeryjnej). Linguodidactica 24 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Ginter, Anna
2021. Multisensoryczność "Listów do Very" Vladimira Nabokova. Acta Neophilologica 2:XXIII ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing
2020. From Linguistic Synaesthesia to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In Embodied Conceptualization or Neural Realization [Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing
2020. Introduction to Synaesthesia. In Embodied Conceptualization or Neural Realization [Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Strik Lievers, Francesca & Irene De Felice
2019. Chapter 5. Metaphors and perception in the lexicon. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo
2019. Chapter 6. Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Qingqing, Chu-Ren Huang & Kathleen Ahrens
2019. Directionality of linguistic synesthesia in Mandarin: A corpus-based study. Lingua 232 ► pp. 102744 ff. DOI logo
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2018. Synaesthesia and Other Figures. What the Senses Tell Us About Figurative Language. In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42], ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Chapter 18. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.