Cover not available
Article published In:
Specialised Translation in Spain: Institutional dimensions
Edited by José Santaemilia-Ruiz and Sergio Maruenda-Bataller
[Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2] 2017
► pp. 636–661

The multilingual university website (MUW) genre ecology

Content analysis and translation processes

| Universitat Jaume I
| Universitat Jaume I
This article analyzes the content of Spanish university websites and the processes involved in translating them, with the aim of identifying the challenges internationalisation poses for these institutions and the technical, organisational, and translation-related solutions that have been adopted for managing their multilingual content, particularly in the case of universities in autonomous communities with two official languages. It examines the communicative situation of the multilingual university website (MUW) genre by applying textual genre analysis, with special emphasis on translation and localisation processes. The empirical study of the macrostructures, multilingual content, and strategies used by each university to translate its website is articulated through the notion of a genre ecology, as a complex conglomerate of genres based on distributed cognition and shared authorship. The analysis shows that the processes involved in creating multilingual content require adopting comprehensive translation and localisation strategies, establishing sole decision-makers for translation management and quality control, and providing the necessary resources to ensure the multifunctionality, dynamicity, interactivity, and adaptability we have identified in monolingual university websites. Finally, we offer suggestions for improving the creation, management and control of multilingual content, and define the profiles of the specialized translators required for this type of institutional website.
Keywords: genre ecologies, multilingual university websites, website content analysis, website translation and localisation, distributed cognition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Complex conglomerates of genres, shared cognition, and the university website (UW) genre ecology
  • 3.Analysis of Spanish UWs: Materials and methods
    • 3.1Macrostructure: organisation of contents, functionalities, and applications
    • 3.2Incorporating multilingual content
    • 3.3Managing the process of creating and authoring multilingual content
    • 3.4Incorporating translation technologies
  • 4.Conclusions and suggestions for further work
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.00010.ezp
References (30)
References
Anastasiou, D., & Schäler, R. (2010). Translating vital information: Localisation, internationalisation, and globalisation. Syn-thèses Journal, 31, 11–25.Google Scholar
Asociación de Directivos de la Comunicación. (2017). Anuario de la Comunicación. Madrid: Asociación de Directivos de la Comunicación.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 28–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, R. (2017). Non-obvious 2017: How to think different, curate ideas and predict the future. San Diego, CA: Ideapress.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: a multiperspective model. Ibérica, 41, 3–19.Google Scholar
(2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Devitt, A. J. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336–357). Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Enge, E., Spencer, S., Stricchiola, J. C., & Fishkin, R. (2009). The art of SEO: Mastering search engine optimization. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Ezpeleta-Piorno, P. (2012a). An example of genre shift in the medicinal product information genre system, Linguistica Antwerpiensia, 111, 139–159.Google Scholar
(2012b). Metagenres and medicinal product information. Panace@, 13(36), 327–332.Google Scholar
Freedman, A., & Smart, G. (1997). Navigating the current of economic policy: Written genres and the distribution of cognitive work at a financial institution. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(4), 238–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Lapiedra Alcami, R., & Barbera Ribera, T. (2012). Social networks and Web 3.0: Their impact on the management and marketing of organizations. Management Decision, 50(10), 1880–1890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halvorson, K. (2008, Dec 16th). The discipline of content strategy. A List Apart. [URL]
Hendler, J. (2009). Web 3.0 emerging. Computer, 42(1), 111–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Deporte. Registro de universidades, centros y títulos (RUCT). Consulted on 6 September 2017 at [URL].
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo Kuklinski, H. (2005). Un modelo de aplicación web institucional universitaria: El caso de los webcom: webs de facultades de comunicación de Iberoamérica. Doctoral thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual i de Publicitat.Google Scholar
Pasadas Ureña, C. (2010). Multialfabetización y redes sociales en la universidad. RUSC: Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 7(2), 17–27.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2000). Genre ecologies: An open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Describing assemblages: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. Computer Writing and Research Lab, 1–9.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelwall, M. (2002). Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university Web site interlinking. Journal of Documentation, 58(5), 563–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wernick, A. (1991). Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. International Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 13–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar