A contrastive study on mitigation of criticism in English and Chinese book reviews
Yubin Qian | University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
The present article is a corpus-based contrastive study on mitigation of criticism in linguistic book reviews in English and in Chinese. It is based on the face theory of Brown and Levinson (1987) and follows the framework of Johnson and Roen (1992). The present article shows the following results: (1) at the local level, there are thirteen mitigation devices in the corpus, of which only six have been introduced by previous studies; devices of ‘generalization’ and ‘metaphorical statement’ are specific to the English sub-corpus, whereas ‘omission’ is only found in Chinese; (2) at the global level, English writers maintain an overall supportive tone with praise largely distributed in both openings and closings, whereas their Chinese counterparts sound much impartial. Differences in findings are then explained from perspectives of cultural values and functions of book reviews.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, C. (2014). A contrastive study of English and Chinese book reviews on linguistics: Perspective of attitudinal meanings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 1009–1016.
Cherry, R. D. (1988). Politeness in written persuasion. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(1), 63–81.
Diani, G. (2015). Politeness. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 169–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ge, K. (1988). 怎样写书评 [How to write book reviews]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press.
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257.
Harris, R. J., Friel, B. M., & Mickelson, N. R. (2006). Attribution of discourse goals for using concrete- and abstract-tenor metaphors and similes with or without discourse context. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(6), 863–879.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Itakura, H., & Tsui, A. (2011). Evaluation in academic discourse: Managing criticism in Japanese and English book reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1366–1379.
Johnson, D. M. (1992). Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 51–71.
Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (1992). Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation. Language in Society, 21(01), 27–57.
Kurzon, D. (2001). The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 61–85.
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. (1998). Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities: The flow of ideas within and among disciplines. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Lu, L. (2003). 汉语辞海 [A comprehensive dictionary of Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Education Publishing House.
Mackiewicz, J. (2007). Compliments and criticisms in book reviews about business communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(2), 188–215.
Mao, L. M. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–486.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
Moreno, A. I., & Suarez, L. (2008). A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 15–26.
Motta-Roth, D. (1998). Discourse analysis and academic BRs: A study of text and disciplinary cultures. In I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J. C. Palmer & J. F. Coll (Eds.), Genre studies in English for academic purposes/ Estudios de género en Inglés para propositos academicos (pp. 29–58). Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35.
Nicolaisen, J. (2002). The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields. Research Evaluation, 11(3), 129–140.
Orteza y Miranda, E. (1996). On book reviewing. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/ Revue de la Pensée Educative, 191–202.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
Richards, I. (1937). The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Salager-Meyer, F., & Alcaraz Ariza, M. Á. (2004). Negative appraisals in academic book reviews: A cross-linguistic approach. In G. M. Candlin C (Ed.), Intercultural aspects of specialized communication (pp. 149–172). Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.
Semino, E., Heywood, J., & Short, M. (2004). Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1271–1294.
Valor, M. L. G. (2000). A pragmatic approach to politeness and modality in the book review articles. Valencia: Universitat de València.
Wang, Y., & Nelson, M. E. (2012). Discursive construction of authorial voice in English book reviews: A contrastive analysis. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 1–24.
Xu, Z. (1994). 书评学概论 [Book reviews study]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.