Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 31:2 (2018) ► pp.605–637

Variable past-time expression across multiple tasks in Tucumán, Argentina

| University of Pittsburgh
| University of Pittsburgh
We examine variable past-time expression in urban Tucumán, Argentina, an understudied region representative of the set of Andean varieties included in Northwestern Argentinean Spanish. We analyze the present perfect (PP) and preterit in two contexts of data collection: a sociolinguistic interview and a contextualized preference task across a range of linguistic and social factors, such as temporal reference and speaker age. Oral results indicate that Tucumán has a higher frequency of use of the PP than has yet been documented in Latin American varieties and even Peninsular Spanish, previously argued to have the highest rate. Preference task results yielded somewhat lower PP rates, confirming that the PP is preferred in speech, whereas the preterit is more viable in written language. The current study documents the highest rate of use of the PP to date across a number of linguistic contexts, contributing to our knowledge of the processes of grammaticalization and task-related differences.
Keywords: sociolinguistic variation, grammaticalization, present perfect, Argentina
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The linguistic context: Tucumán Spanish
  • The route of evolution of the perfect
  • The present perfect and the preterit in LAS and PS varieties
  • Method
    • Research questions
    • Participants
    • Data collection
      • Sociolinguistic interview
      • Contextualized preference task
      • Language background questionnaire
    • Data coding for the sociolinguistic interview
      • Identification of tokens
      • Independent linguistic variables
        • Aktionsart
        • Temporal adverbials
        • Temporal reference
        • Clause type
        • Object number
      • Social variables
        • Age
        • Gender
        • Educational level
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Rates of use across Spanish varieties
    • Statistical analysis
      • Binomial, mixed-effects logistic regression: Oral data
      • Significant independent variables: Oral interview
      • Binomial, mixed-effects logistic regression: Contextualized preference task
      • Significant independent variables: Contextualized preference task
    • Overview of oral and preference data
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions and future research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.16013.ter
References (43)
References
Amaral, P., & Howe, C. (2010). Detours along the perfect path. In S. Colina, A. Olarrea, & A. M. Carvalho (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009 (pp. 387–404). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arce-Arenales, M., Axelrod, M., & Fox, B. A. (1994). Active voice and middle diathesis: A cross-linguistic perspective. In B. A. Fox & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Voice: form and function (pp. 1–22). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. J. (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Massachusetts: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: The grammaticalization of tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2002). Patterns of variation including change. In J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (297–324). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, O. (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Donni De Mirande, N. (1992). El español actual hablado en la Argentina. In C. H. Alonso (Ed.), Historia y presente del español de América (pp. 383–411). Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León.Google Scholar
Dumont, J. (2013). Another look at the present perfect in an Andean variety of Spanish: Grammaticalization and evidentiality in Quiteño Spanish. In J. C. Amaro et al. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 279–291). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. M. (1997). Contrastive and innovative uses of the present perfect and the preterite in Spanish in contact with Quechua. Hispania, 801, 859–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløgstad, G. N. (2016). Preterit expansion and perfect demise in Porteño Spanish and beyond. A critical perspective on cognitive grammaticalization theory. Oslo: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, R., & Caracoche, M. R. (1977). Frecuencia de uso del pretérito simple y el pretérito compuesto en el habla de San Miguel de Tucumán. Estudio exploratorio y anotaciones sociolingüísticas.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2008). Comparing interview and written elicitation tasks in native and non-native data: Do speakers do what we think they do? In J. Bruhn de Garavito & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.64–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1982). The “past simple” and “present perfect” in Romance. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), Studies in the Romance verb (pp.42–70). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, C. (2006). Cross-dialectal features of the Spanish present perfect: A typological analysis of form and function. The Ohio State University: Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Howe, C., & Schwenter, S. (2003). Present perfect for preterit across Spanish dialects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 91, 61–75.Google Scholar
Howe, C., & Schwenter, S. A. (2008). Variable constraints on past reference in dialects of Spanish. In M. Westmoreland & J. A. Thomas (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 100–108). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Jara Yupanqui, I. M. (2006). The use of the preterite and the present perfect in the Spanish of Lima. University of Pittsburgh: PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 31, 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., Geeslin, K. L., & Fafulas, S. (2015). Study abroad and the SLA of variable structures: A look at the present perfect, the copula contrast, and the present progressive in Mexico and Spain. Probus, 27(2), 307–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempas, I. (2006). Estudio sobre el uso del pretérito perfecto prehodiernal en el español peninsular y en comparación con la variedad del español argentino hablada en Santiago del Estero. University of Helsinky: PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1981). What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description? In D. Sankoff & H. Cedergren (Eds.), Variation Omnibus (pp. 177–200). Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
(1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Legendre, G., & Sorace, A. (2010). Auxiliaries and intransitivity in French and in Romance. In D. Godard (Ed.), Fundamental issues in the Romance languages (pp.171–220). Stanford, Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Martorell de Laconi, S. (2001). Algunos aspectos sintácticos y morfosintácticos del español hablado culto de la ciudad de Salta. Departamento de publicaciones, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.Google Scholar
Martorell de Laconi, S., & Soto de Matulovich, E. (Eds.). (1995). Valores de los pretéritos perfectos en el español y en Salta en particular (pp. 722–738). Proceedings from The Fourth International Conference on Latin American Spanish. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Piñero, G. (2000). Perfecto simple y perfecto compuesto en la norma culta de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Madrid-Frankfurt: Iberoamericana – Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. (2011). Grammaticalization and linguistic variation. In H. Narrog and B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 209–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (2000). The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 111, 315–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. (2010). Nueva gramática de la lengua española, Manual Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, C. (2016). Indefinite past reference and the present perfect in Argentinian Spanish. Studies in Language, 40(3), 622–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Perfect evolution and change: A study of Preterit and Present Perfect usage in contemporary and earlier Argentina. The University of Melbourne: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Thibault, P. (1981). Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. In B. B. Johns & D. R. Strong (Eds.), Syntactic change (pp. 205–216). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. A. (1994). The grammaticalization of anterior in progress: evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language, 181, 71–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S. A., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2010). Grammaticalization paths as variable contexts in weak complementarity in Spanish. In J. Walker (Ed.), Aspect in grammatical variation (pp. 13–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The “perfect” road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 201, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. University of California: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Squartini, M., & Bertinetto, P. (2000). The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Ö. Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 403–439). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2012). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1995). Subjectification and grammaticalization. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An Introduction to sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Mastrantuono, Anna & Brendan Regan
2024. Present perfect and preterit variation in the Spanish of Lima and Mexico city: findings from a corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:2 ► pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Zahler, Sara L. & Melissa E. Whatley
2023. Chapter 11. Learning context and the development of second language Spanish. In Study Abroad and the Second Language Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variation in Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 37], ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2021. Chapter 10. Sophisticated language use in context. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Kanwit, Matthew & Virginia Terán
2020. Chapter 12. Proposing a tripartite intensifier system. In Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 27], ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.