Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 32:1 (2019) ► pp.356–384

Rhetorical strategies in PhD conclusions of computer science

From the review of the study to consolidation of research space

| Universitat Politècnica de València
This study investigates the predominant moves and move patterns used in the separate final conclusion chapters of 48 PhD theses of computer science at a UK university. The focus is on the most salient connections of steps in the review of the study (Move 1) with steps for the consolidation of research space (Move 2). The most common combinations relate (1) a summary of the thesis work to the product and the evaluation of the product, (2) the purpose, thesis statement or hypothesis to the findings or results, (3) the research questions to the methodology, product or claim, (4) a problem or need to a specific methodology, a new product and/or a claim, and (5) a summary of the work done in each thesis chapter to the findings and claims. Some findings are specific of the field of computer science. The study has pedagogical implications for courses of English for Academic Purposes (EAP).
Keywords: PhD thesis, conclusion, move, step, computer science
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Analytical procedure
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative results
      • 4.1.1Moves, move sequences and cycles of move sequences
      • 4.1.2M1-M2 patterns
      • 4.1.3Connections of steps of M1 with steps of M2
    • 4.2Qualitative description of M1-M2 sequences: The connections of steps of M1 with steps of M2
      • 4.2.1From reviewing the thesis work to presenting and evaluating the product: M1-Step 1/M2- Steps 4 and 11
      • 4.2.2From restating the purpose and the methodology to presenting the findings: M1-Steps 2 and 8/ M2-Step 3
      • 4.2.3From restating the thesis statement and/or research questions to presenting answers to research questions or the claim: M1-Step 2 / M2-Steps 2, 4, or 10
      • 4.2.4From restating the problem/need to presenting and evaluating solutions: M1-Step 7/ M2-Steps 2, 4 and/or 11
      • 4.2.5From summarizing the specific work done in each thesis chapter to presenting findings or making the claim: M1-Step 11/ M2-Steps 3 or 10
    • 4.3Connections of steps of M1 with steps of M2 in M1-M2 cycles
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.16034.sol
References (43)
References
Asunción, T. Z. S. & Querol, M. B. (2013). Rhetorical moves in the introductions of masters’ theses. Graduate Research Journal, 6(1–2), 65–85.Google Scholar
Badley, G. (2009). Academic writing as shaping and reshaping. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(2), 209–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 81, 241–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 4–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 207–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotos, E. (2014). Genre-based automated writing evaluation for L2 research writing: from design to evaluation and enhancement. New York: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A., Lai, C. & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 231, 47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1997) (1910). How we think. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications Inc. (originally published in 1910 by DC Heath and Co, Publishers: Boston).Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: an investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text. Discourse analysis monographs 131 (pp. 219–228). English Language Research: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Geng, Y. & Warton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 80–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Variation and text structure: The discussion section in economics research articles. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 131–1321, 107–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. M. (2001). An interdisciplinary, interinstitutional learning communities program: Student involvement and student success. In I. Leki (Ed.), Academic writing programs: Case studies in TESOL practice (pp. 61–72). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
(2002). Destabilizing and enriching novice students’ genre theories. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 237–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Johns, A. M. & Swales, J. M. (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, M. & Negretti, R. (2016). Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 411, 36–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwan, B. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 251, 30–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewkowicz, J. (2009). Concluding your master’s level thesis. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 591, 63–72.Google Scholar
(2012). The challenges of writing a successful thesis conclusion. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language (pp. 107–125). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Lim, J. M. H. (2014). Formulating research questions in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 351, 66–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, J. M. H., Loi, C. K. & Hashim, A. (2014). Postulating hypotheses in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics: A qualitative investigation into rhetorical shifts and linguistic mechanisms. Ibérica, 271, 121–142.Google Scholar
Lim, J. M. H., Loi, C. K., Hashim, A. & Liu, M. S. M. (2015). Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to U.S. universities: An inquiry into doctoral students’ communicative resources in language education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 201, 69–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindeberg, A. (1994). Rhetorical conventions in the discussion/conclusion sections of research articles in finance, management and marketing. In M. Brekke, O. Anderson, T. Dahl & J. Myking (Eds.), Applications and implications of current LSP research. Proceedings of the 9th European LSP symposium (pp. 761–779). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 211, 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L. J. & Tuckwell, K. (2012). Change and stability: Examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 111, 332–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B. & Woodrow, L. (2012). Thesis and dissertation writing: Moving beyond the text. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language (pp. 88–104). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2011). The Discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes, 301, 164–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 301, 479–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peng, J. (1987). Organizational features in chemical engineering research articles. ELR Journal, 11, 79–116.Google Scholar
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ridley, D. (2012) (2008). The literature review. A step-by-step guide for students. Second edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C. (2015). Announcing one’s work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of Move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 401, 27–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). A move-step analysis of the concluding chapters in computer science PhD theses. Ibérica, 321(fall), 105–132.Google Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M. & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 4–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soler-Monreal, C. & Gil-Salom, L. (2010). Moves, steps and linguistic signals in RA Discussion sections. In W. Hahn & C. Vertan (Eds.), Fachsprachen in der Weltweiten Kommunikation / Specialised Language in Global Communication. Proceedings of the XVIth European Symposium on Language for Special Purposes LSP). Series Sprache in der Gesellschaft, Band 30 / Language in the Society, volume 30 (pp. 519–528). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres. Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 221, 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yayli, D. (2011). From genre-awareness to cross-genre awareness: A study in an EFL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101, 121–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar