Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 33:1 (2020) ► pp.202–226

Productivity and graduality in the Layered Structure of the Word

Opaque word-formation in Old English

| Universidad de La Rioja
| Universidad de La Rioja
This article deals with two theoretical aspects of lexical derivation, productivity and graduality. After a discussion of transparency and opaqueness in Old English word-formation, it focuses on lexical productivity and puts forward a typology of recursive phenomena. On the basis of this typology, the morphological template of the Layered Structure of the Word is revised. The main conclusion is that a more diachronically oriented analysis is likely to opt for a decompositional template, whereas a more synchronically directed study which seeks typological validity will probably favour the template with one functional slot. If the focus is on diachronic linguistics, a template based on minimal constituent analysis can guarantee a detailed description of the derivational steps of the word, including non-affixal derivation and semantically opaque affixes.
Keywords: derivational morphology, Old English, Layered Structure of the Word, recursivity, productivity, graduality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Transparency vs. opaqueness in the derivations of Old English
  • 3.Productivity in lexical derivation
  • 4.Lexical graduality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Dictionaries and lexical databases
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.17058.urr
References (53)
References
Brinton, L. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, L., & Closs Traugott, E. (2005). Lexicalisation and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, F. (2006). Derivational Morphology in Role and Reference Grammar: a new proposal. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 191, 41–66.Google Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, F., & Sosa Acevedo, E. (2008). The morphology-semantics interface in word formation. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 571, 91–108.Google Scholar
de la Cruz, J. (1975). Old English pure prefixes: Structure and function. Linguistics, 13(145), 47–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dietz, K. (2007). Denominale Abstraktbildungen des Altenglischen: Die Wortbildung der Abstrakta auf -dōm, -hād, -lāc, -rǣden, -sceaft, -stæf und -wist und ihrer Entsprechungen im Althochdeutschen und im Altnordischen. NOWELE-North Western European Language Evolution. Supplement volume, 231, 97–172.Google Scholar
(2010). Die altenglischen Präfixbildungen. Anglia. Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie, 128(3), 561–613.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. (1913). Die I. und II. Ablautsreihe in der ae. Worbildung. Kiel: H. Fiencke.Google Scholar
Heidermanns, F. (1993). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. (1983). The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb. Turku: Tutun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Horgan, D. (1980). Patterns of variation and interchangeability in some Old English prefixes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 81(2), 127–130.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1968). Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by means of aZero Morpheme. PhD Dissertation. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität.Google Scholar
(1992). Semantics and vocabulary. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language I: The beginnings to 1066 (pp. 290–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Arista, J. (2008). Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In R. Van Valin (Ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). A Typology of Morphological Constructions. In C. Butler & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing Constructions (pp. 85–115). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a). Projections and Constructions in Functional Morphology. The Case of Old English HRĒOW . Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 393–425.Google Scholar
(2011b). Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English. English Studies, 92(3), 323–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32(4), 411–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Recursivity, Derivational Depth and the Search for Old English Lexical Primes. Studia Neophilologica, 85(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Noun layers in Old English. Asymmetry and mismatches in lexical derivation. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13(3), 160–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). El paradigma derivativo del inglés antiguo: alternancias, recursividad y desajustes de la derivación basada en verbos fuertes. Onomazeín, 37(5), 144–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The semantic poles of Old English: Toward the 3D representation of complex polysemy. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(1), 96–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Arista, J., & Cortés Rodríguez, F. (2014). From directionals to telics: meaning construction, word-formation and grammaticalisation in Role and Reference Grammar. In M. A. Gómez González, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & F. Gonzálvez García (Eds.), Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space (pp. 229–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martín Arista, J., & Vea Escarza, R. (2016). Assessing the semantic transparency of Old English affixation: adjective and noun formation. English Studies, 971, 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateo Mendaza, R. (2012). The Old English adjectival suffixes -cund and -isc: textual occurrences and productivity. ES-Revista de Filología Inglesa, 331, 197–213.Google Scholar
(2014). The Old English adjectival affixes ful- and –ful: a text-based account on productivity. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution, 67(1), 77–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Matching productivity indexes and diachronic evolution. The Old English affixes ful-, -isc, -cund and -ful . Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 60(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novo Urraca, C. (2016a). Old English Suffixation: Content and Transposition. English Studies 971, 638–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Morphological relatedness and the typology of adjectival formation in Old English. Studia Neophilologica, 88(1), 43–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). The types and categories of Old English recursive compounding. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 121, 77–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novo Urraca, C., & Pesquera Fernández, L. (2015). Alternation vs. Allomorphic Variation in Old English Word-Formation: Evidence from the Derivational Paradigm of Strong Verbs. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 491, 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojanguren López, A. E. (2014). Alternation vs. Variation in Old English. Methodological and descriptive issues. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 91, 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogura, M. (1995). The interchangeability of Old English verbal prefixes. Anglo-Saxon England, 241, 67–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavey, E. (2010). The Structure of Language. An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmgren, C. (1904). English Gradation-Nouns in Their Relation to Strong Verbs. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Pounder, A. (2000). Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuldt, C. (1905). Die Bildung der schwachen Verba im Altenglischen. Kiel: Verlag von Robert Cordes.Google Scholar
Seebold, E. (1970). Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stark, D. (1982). The Old English weak verbs. A diachronic and synchronic analysis. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torre Alonso, R. (2010). The Morphological Structure of Old English Complex Nouns. ATLANTIS, 33(1), 127–146.Google Scholar
(2011). Affix Combination in Old English Noun Formation: Distribution and Constraints. RESLA-Revista Española de Linguística Aplicada, 241, 257–279.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H. (Ed.). (2010). Recursion and Human Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R., & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vea Escarza, R. (2012). Structural and Functional Aspects of Morphological Recursivity. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution, 64/651, 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Old English adjectival affixation. Structure and function. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 48(2–3), 2–21.Google Scholar
(2014). Split and unified functions in the formation of Old English nouns and adjectives. Revista de Lingüísica y Lenguas Aplicadas, 91, 110–116.Google Scholar
(2016a). Recursivity and inheritance in the formation of Old English nouns and adjectives. Studia Neophilologica, 88(1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Old English affixation. A structural-functional analysis. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dictionaries and lexical databases
Bosworth, J., & Toller, T. N. 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. R. C. 1996 (1896). A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. 1987 (1896). The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martín Arista, Javier. (Ed.). Laura García Fernández, Miguel Lacalle Palacios, Ana Elvira Ojanguren López and Esaúl Ruiz Narbona. 2016. NerthusV3. Online Lexical Database of Old English. Nerthus Project. Universidad de La Rioja. [[URL]]