Referencias

[ p. 583 ]Referencias

Atkins, B. T. S.
(1987) Semantic ID tags: corpus evidence for dictionary senses. En Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary, 17–36.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(Ed.) (2000) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2002) Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. En R. Dirven y R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–77). Berlin and Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Metonymy in cognitive linguistics. An analysis and a few modest proposals. En H. Cuyckens, Th. Berg, R. Dirven y K. U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (pp. 223–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The Multilevel Operation of Metonymy in Grammar and Discourse, with Particular Attention to Metonymyc Chains. En F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza y S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009) Motivation of construction meaning and form. The roles of metonymy and inference. En K. U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg y A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 363–401). Amsterdam and Filadelfia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Reviewing the properties of metonymy as a technical construct, with particular attention to the view of metonymy as a prototype category. En R. Benczes, A. Barcelona y F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a Consensus View (pp. 7–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) La metonimia conceptual. En I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano y J. Valenzuela (Eds.), Lingüística cognitiva (pp. 123–146). Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Barnden, J.
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy. Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., y Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(Eds) (2011) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C.
(1981) Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. Nueva York: Garland.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2002/1993) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. En R. Dirven y R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 161–205). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., y Cruse, D.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R.
(2003) Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conceptualisation [1993]. En R. Dirven y R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 75–112). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
[ p. 584 ]
Evans, V., y Green, M.
(2006) Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1994) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Mapping in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., y Atkins, B. T. S.
(2000) Describing Polysemy: The Case of ‘Crawl’. En Y. Ravin y C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy. Theoretical and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(1993) Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(3), 223–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L.
(2002/1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistics action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th.
(2006) Corpus based-methods and cognitive semantics: The many meanings of to run. En S. Th. Gries y A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 57–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., y Divjak, D. S.
(2009) Behavioral profiles: a corpus-based approach towards semantic analysis. En V. Evans y S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–75). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(1999) Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: Across linguistic study. Tesis doctoral. Edimburgo: Universidad de Edimburgo.Google Scholar
(2003) El cómo y el porqué de la polisemia de los verbos de percepción. En C. Molina, M. Blanco, J. Marín, A. L. Rodríguez, M. Romano (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in Spain at the turn of the century / La Lingüística Cognitiva en España en el cambio de siglo (pp. 213–28). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., y Valenzuela, J.
(2012) Lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2000) Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., y Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistics view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., y Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., y Kövecses, Z.
(1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. En D. Holland y N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (pp. 195–221). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 585 ]
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanfors University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Applications. Stanford, CA: Stanfors Universitu Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin and Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy. Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moliner, M.
(2007) Diccionario de uso del español (2 vols.). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y., y Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 269–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G.
(2003) Connotation and Collocation: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Color Words In English and Italian. Tesis doctoral. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
(2006) Connotative meaning in English and Italian Colour-Word Metaphors. Metaphorik, 10, 59–93.Google Scholar
Radden, G.
(2000) How metonymic are metaphors? En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 93–108). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Radden, G., y Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. En K. U. Panther y G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española
Diccionario de la lengua española (23ª ed.). Disponible en http://​www​.rae​.es​/rae​.html
Rosch, E.
(1973) On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. En T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 193–233.Google Scholar
(1978) Principles of categorization. En E. Rosch y B. B. Lloyd, Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale: NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Millman, L., y Nemeroff, C.
(1986) Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007) High level cognitive models: In search a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. En K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on Metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frnkfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., y Miral Uson, R.
(2007) High level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. En G. Radden, K. M. Köpcke, T. Berg y P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 33–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 586 ]
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2011) Metonymy and cognitive operations. En R. Benczes, A. Barcelona y F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a Consensus View (pp. 103–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref. Crossref
Seco, M., Andrés, O., y Ramos, G.
(2004) Diccionario fraseológico documentado del español actual. Locuciones y modismos españoles. Madrid: Santillana.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. D., y Clore, G. L.
(2009) The color of sin: white and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20, 1019–1021. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soto Nieto, A., y Barcelona, A.
(2018) Principales patrones metonímicos en las extensiones semánticas de los términos cromáticos en español. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 75, 269–290. http://​webs​.ucm​.es​/info​/circulo​/no75​/soto​.pdf, doi:  Crossref
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, D.
(1999) Linguistic Evidence for Polysemy in the Mind: A response to William Croft and Dominiek Sandra. Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 343–368.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S.
(1962) Semántica. Introducción a la ciencia del significado. Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical Investigations. New York: The MacMillan Co.Google Scholar
Zohng, Ch. B., y Liljenquist, K.
(2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 587 ]