Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 36:1 (2023) ► pp.87–119

Functions and transmission of humour in interpreter-mediated healthcare consultations

An exploratory study

ORCID logo | University of Alcalá | FITISPos-UAH Research group
This paper presents an exploratory study of humour in multilingual, multicultural healthcare interactions with an interpreter. Data are part of a dataset of healthcare encounters observed in a hospital in Madrid (Spain) for a period of five months, which included the participation of six interpreters. Four aspects were analysed: (1) who initiates humour, (2) who receives humour, (3) what the functions of humour are, and (4) how interpreters behave vis-à-vis humour occurrences. Preliminary findings indicate that humour allows patients, healthcare providers and interpreters to pursue relational and transactional goals similar to those present in monolingual healthcare interactions, such as handling negative emotions. Interpreters are active co-constructors of humour, and all participants in the triad work together towards the establishment and recognition of a humorous frame, where hierarchical relationships seem to exist. Together with linguistic and cultural differences between participants, interpreters must appropriately render background and contextual knowledge to ensure humour maintains its intended function, which emphasises the healthcare interpreter’s active role in interaction. These findings call for greater attention to research on humour, as well as specific training for interpreters to highlight its relational power and, thus, ensure successful communication in multicultural, multilingual (healthcare) settings.
Keywords: humour, healthcare interpreting, language-discordant consultations, healthcare settings, foreign patients, doctor–patient communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An overview of research on humour
    • 2.1Relevance of humour in healthcare provider–patient encounters
  • 3.An overview of healthcare interpreting
    • 3.1Rendering humour in intercultural and interlinguistic interpreter-mediated (healthcare) interactions
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Humour dynamics in interpreter-mediated healthcare interactions
    • 5.2Functions of humour in interpreter-mediated healthcare interactions
      • 5.2.1 Creating a relaxed atmosphere: You’re not pregnant
      • 5.2.2 Handing negative emotions: Blood? I’ll need to fast and then I’m hungry
      • 5.2.3 Helping another participant to handle negative emotions: Even my soul would hurt!
      • 5.2.4 Communicating criticism, rejection or disagreement: We’re under the control of law and authority here
      • 5.2.5 Managing power asymmetry: This is a medical consultation, not a supermarket
      • 5.2.6 Saving face: But I need to ask anyway
    • 5.3Interpreter behaviours vis-à-vis humour in interpreter-mediated healthcare interactions
      • 5.3.1Complete transmission of humour
      • 5.3.2Partial transmission of humour
      • 5.3.3Omission of humour
      • 5.3.4Initiation of humour
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.20041.cri
References (66)
References
Álvaro Aranda, C. 2020. Formación y experiencia profesional como diferenciadores en la actuación de intérpretes sanitarios: un estudio de caso desde la sociología de las profesiones [Training and professional experience as differentiators in the performance of healthcare interpreters: A case study from the sociology of the professions] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alcalá]
Álvaro Aranda, C., & Lázaro Gutiérrez, R. 2017. Small talk as a communicative resource in monolingual and interpreted medical consultations: A comparative analysis. Czech and Slovak Linguistic Review, 1–2/2017, 25–37. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from [URL]
Álvaro Aranda, C., Lázaro Gutiérrez, R., & Li, S. 2021. Towards a collaborative structure of interpreter-mediated medical consultations: Complementing functions between healthcare interpreters and providers. Social Science & Medicine, 269 1, 113529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amato, A., & Mack, G. 2011. Interpreting the Oscar night on Italian TV: An interpreter’s nightmare? The Interpreter’s Newsletter, 16 1, 37–61. Retrieved March 31, 2021, from [URL]
Angelelli, C. 2004. Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Healthcare interpreting explained. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antonini, R. 2010. And the Oscar goes to…: A study of the simultaneous interpretation of humour at the Academy Awards Ceremony. In D. Chiaro (Ed.), Translation, humour and the media: Translation and humour, 21 (pp. 53–70). Continuum.Google Scholar
Argaman, E. 2009. Arguing within an institutional hierarchy: How argumentative talk and interlocutors’ embodied practices preserve a superior–subordinate relationship. Discourse Studies, 11 (5), 515–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bach, S., & Grant, A. 2010. Communication and interpersonal skills in nursing (2nd ed.). Learning Matters.Google Scholar
Beach, W., & Prickett, E. 2016. Laughter, humor, and cancer: Delicate moments and poignant interactional circumstances. Health Communication, 32 (7), 791–802. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, N. 2006. Interactional adjustments in humorous intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3 (1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benson, J., Thistlethwaite, J., & Moore, P. 2009. Mental health across cultures: A practical guide for health professionals. Radcliffe Oxford.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Collinson, D. L. 2002. Managing humour. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (3), 269–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dharamsi, S., Whiteman, M., & Woollard, R. 2010. The use of cynical humor in medical staff: Implications for professionalism and the development of humanistic qualities in medicine. Education for Health. Change in Learning & Practice, 23 (3), 533.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J. 2017. The signed language interpreter’s role in team meeting discourse. In R. Lawson & D. Sayers (Eds.), Sociolinguistic research: Application and impact. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. J., Smeltzer, L. R., & Leap, T. L. 1990. Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior to management. Journal of Management, 16(2), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. L. 1989. Language and power. Longman.Google Scholar
Fernández López, M de la O. 2010. El humor como lengua de contacto. ¿Estrategia afiliativa o de autoafirmación? Estudio comparativo inglés-español del discurso institucional [Humour as a language of contact: Affiliative or self-affirmation strategy? An English–Spanish comparative study of institutional discourse]. Odisea: Revista de Estudios Ingleses, 11 1, 285–299. Retrieved January 30, 2020, from [URL]
Francis, L. 1994. Laughter, the best mediation: Humor as emotion management in interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 17 (2), 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, L., Monahan, K., & Berger, C. 1999. A laughing matter? The uses of humor in medical interactions. Motivation and emotion, 23 (2), 155–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildberg, F. A., Paaske, K. J., Rasmussen, V. L., Nissen, R. D., Bradley, S. K., & Hounsgaard, L. 2016. Humor: Power conveying social structures inside forensic mental health nursing. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 12 (3), 120–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P. 2010. Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (6), 1485–1498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, L. D., & Mejias, G. M. 2013. The interpreter’s ultimate challenge: Humor in conferences. Translation Journal, 17 (4). Retrieved 10 January, 2021, from [URL]
Goriup, J., Stričević, J., & Sruk, V. 2017. Is education for using humour in nursing needed? (Slovenian case study on sociological and ergonomic aspects on the impact of humour on nursing professionals). Acta Educationis Generalis, 7 (3), 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granek-Catarivas, M., Goldstein-Ferber, S., Azuri, Y., Vinker, S., & Kahan, E. 2005. Use of humour in primary care: Different perceptions among patients and physicians. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81 (952), 126–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. M. 2017. Humor in medicine: A literature review of humor’s potential therapeutic value in health care. [Undergraduate honours thesis, University of Arkansas, AR]. Retrieved 10 December, 2020, from [URL]
Haakana, M. 2002. Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 1, 207–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C. 2019. Humour and sympathy in medical practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 23 1, 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. 2001. The pragmatics of humour support. International Journal of Humour Research, 14 (1), 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 2003. Conversation analysis and institutional talk. Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2 (2), 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., & Major, G. 2002. Communicating on the wards: A pilot study. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, 7 1. University of Wellington. Retrieved 30 January, 2021, from [URL]
Holmes, H., & Marra, M. 2002. Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1683–1710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, E. 2016. Bilingual health communication. Working with interpreters in cross-cultural care. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F., Lu, S., Jiang, T., & Jia, H. 2020. Does the relation between humor styles and subjective well-being vary across culture and age? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 1, 2213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kai, J. 2013. Enhancing consultations with interpreters: Leaning more about how. British journal of general practice, 63 (607), 66–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalina, S. 2015. Ethical challenges in different interpreting settings. MonTI Special Issue, 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lázaro Gutiérrez, R. 2018. Interpretación sanitaria para víctimas de violencia de género [Medical interpreting for victims of gender-based violence]. Panace@, XIX (47), 96–105. Retrieved 20 January, 2021, from [URL]
Lidz, V. 2010. Social control in doctor-patient relationships: Similarities and differences across medical specialties. In J. J. Chriss (Ed.), Social control: Informal, legal, and medical (pp. 149–169). Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liendo, P. J. 2013. The challenges of interpreting humour (a.k.a. ‘Don’t kill the killjoy’). Translation Journal, 17 (1). Retrieved 20 December, 2020, from [URL]
Martin, R., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37 (1), 48–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez Sierra, J. J., & Zabalbeascoa, P. 2017. Humour as a symptom of research trends in translation studies. MonTI, 91, 9–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateo, M., & Zabalbeascoa, P. 2019. Translation and humour. In R. A. Valdeón, Á. Vidal & J. Muñoz-Basols (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish translation studies. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCabe, C. 2004. Nurse-patient communication: An exploration of patients’ experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13 (1), 41–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCreaddie, M., & Payne, S. 2014. Humour in health-care interactions: a risk worth taking. Health Expectations, 17(3), 332–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miczo, N., Averbeck, J., & Mariani, T. 2009. Affiliative and aggressive humor, attachment dimensions, and interaction goals. Communication Studies, 60(5), 443–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mullany, L. 2004. Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings. Multilingua, 231, 13–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murata, K. 2014. An empirical cross-cultural study of humour in business meetings in New Zealand and Japan. Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 251–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navaza, B., Guionnet, A., Navarro, M., Estevez, L., Pérez Molina, J. A., & López Vélez, R. 2012. Reluctance to do blood testing limits HIV diagnosis and appropriate health care of sub-Saharan African migrants living in Spain. AIDS and Behaviour, 16 (1), 30–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, K., & Smith, S. 1994. Problem with patients: Managing complicated transactions. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski, S. 2015. Virtuous laughter: We should teach medical learners the art of humor. Clinical Care, 19 (1), 222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parrilla Gómez, L., & Postigo Pinazo, E. 2018. Intercultural communication and interpreter’s roles: widening taxonomies for effective interaction within the healthcare context. Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning E, 5 1, 236–314.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 2013. The social system (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlicek, M., & Pöchhacker, F. 2002. Humour in simultaneous conference interpreting. The Translator, 8 (2), 385–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnurr, S. 2009. Leadership and humour. An analysis of workplace discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scholl, J., & Ragan, S. 2003. The use of humour in promoting positive provider-patient interactions in a hospital rehabilitation unit. Health Communication, 15 (3), 319–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholl, J. 2007. The use of humor to promote patient-centered care. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35 (2), 156–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schöpf, A., Martin, G., & Keating, M. 2015. Humor as a communication strategy in provider-patient communication in a chronic care setting. Qualitative Health Research, 27 (3), 374–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seale, C., Rivas, C., & Kelly, M. 2013. The challenge of communication in interpreted consultations in diabetes care: A mixed methods study. British Journal of General Practice, 63 (607), 125–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., & Rayson, P. 2018. Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. Routledge.Google Scholar
Swabey, L., & Malcolm, K. 2012. In our hands: Educating healthcare interpreters. Gallaudet University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vymětalová, D. 2017. Strategies of interpreting humour in the European Parliament. [Master’s thesis, University of Olomouc] Retrieved 30 March, 2021, from [URL]
Wadensjö, C. 1998. Interpreting as interaction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Yabe, M. 2020. Healthcare providers’ and deaf patients’ interpreting preferences for critical care and non-critical care: Video remote interpreting. Disability and Health Journal, 13(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Álvaro Aranda, Cristina
2024. Transcending medical consultations. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 682 ff. DOI logo
Norberg, Børge Lønnebakke, Linn Okkenhaug Getz, Tor Magne Johnsen, Bjarne Austad & Paolo Zanaboni
2023. General Practitioners’ Experiences With Potentials and Pitfalls of Video Consultations in Norway During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Qualitative Analysis of Free-Text Survey Answers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 25 ► pp. e45812 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.