Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics: Online-First Articles

The Spanish Computer-Assisted Listening and Speaking Tutor

A multilingual approach to pronunciation training

ORCID logo | Universitat de València
ORCID logo | Norwegian University of Science and Technology
This article presents the Spanish version of the Computer-Assisted Listening and Speaking Tutor (CALST), an online platform that can be used to complement pronunciation training in the classroom. The Spanish CALST offers listening, speaking, and spelling exercises for Northern-Central Peninsular Spanish as an L2. Exercises are tailored by an automatic comparison with the learner’s native language based on a database of phonetically specified phoneme inventories for over 500 languages, with the result that learners with different L1s are exposed to different exercises adapted to their specific needs. In this article, we present a description of the exercises as well as the criteria used to develop Spanish content for CALST. We discuss the limitations of the platform, the logging of user results as a partial solution to these limitations, and the possible future use of the logged data to increase our understanding of L2 acquisition.
Keywords: pronunciation training, Spanish L2, computer-assisted, discrimination, identification, orthography, multilingual
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Challenges for Spanish pronunciation training
    • 1.2The significance of the learner’s native language
  • 2.A multilingual approach to online pronunciation training
    • 2.1L1‑L2map and its use in CALST
    • 2.2CALST
    • 2.3Beyond single segments
  • 3.Developing the Spanish CALST
    • 3.1Informants
    • 3.2Spanish phonological inventory in L1‑L2map
    • 3.3Phonological comparison, allophonic training
    • 3.4Criteria for exercise creation
      • 3.4.1Exercises contrasting individual phonemes and their allophones
      • 3.4.2Consonant cluster and stress exercises
    • 3.5Selecting content for the exercises
  • 4.Limitations and future exploitation
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.22046.mar
References (56)
References
Arteaga, D. L. (2000). Articulatory phonetics in the first-year Spanish classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (iii), 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartolí, M. (2005). La pronunciación en la clase de lenguas extranjeras. Phonica, 1 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
Bent, T. & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114 (3), 1600–1610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2006). Morphological structure and phonological domains in Spanish denominal derivation. In F. Martínez-Gil & S. Colina (Eds.), Optimality-theoretic studies in Spanish phonology (pp. 278–311). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blecua Falgueras, B., & Esteve Martín, M. T. (2014). Realizaciones de las oclusivas y aproximantes del español por parte de hablantes chinos [Oral presentation]. VI Congreso Internacional de Fonética Experimental, Valencia, Spain.
Bohn, O.-S. (2017). Cross-language and second language speech perception. In E. M. Fernandez & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitkreutz, J., Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 19 1, 51–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broselow, E. (2004). Unmarked structures and emergent rankings in second language phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8 (1), 51–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broselow, E., & Kang, Y. (2013). Second language phonology and speech. In J. Herschensohn, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 529–554). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camus-Oyarzún, P. A. (2016). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the production of second language Spanish: A classroom study [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University].
Colantoni, L., Escudero, P., Marrero-Aguiar, V., & Steele, J. (2021). Evidence-based design principles for Spanish pronunciation teaching. Frontiers in Communication, 6 1, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. (1999). The parallel distribution of aspirated stops and /h/ in American English. In K. Baertsch & D. A. Dinnsen (Eds.), Indiana University working papers in linguistics 1: Optimal green ideas in phonology (pp. 1–10). Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (3), 379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals. Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48 (3), 393–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing ‘deafness’ in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36 1, 406–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106 (2), 682–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27 (2), 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). From phonemic differences to constraint rankings. Research on Second Language Phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26 (4), 513–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Typological markedness and second language phonology. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 95–115). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliot, A. R. (1997). On the teaching and acquisition of pronunciation within a communicative approach. Hispania, 88 (1), 95–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15 (1), 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium.Google Scholar
(2018). It’s input that matters most, not age. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21 (5), 919–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J. A., Holtby, A., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). 2010 survey of pronunciation teaching in adult ESL programs in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 29 (1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J. A., Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., & Urzúa, F. S. (2016). Pronunciation teaching practices in communicative second language classes. The Language Learning Journal, 44 (2), 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil Fernández, J. (2007). Fonética para profesores de español: de la teoría a la práctica. Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Gong, J., Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M. (2017). Ab initio perceptual learning of foreign language sounds: Spanish consonant acquisition by Chinese learners. System, 66 1, 142–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 8). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Husby, O., & Øvregaard, Å., Wik, P., Bech, Ø., Albertsen, E., Nefzaoui, S., Skarpnes, E., & Koreman, J. (2011). Dealing with L1 background and L2 dialects in Norwegian CAPT. Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE2011), Venice, Italy, 133–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Instituto Cervantes. (2022). El español: una lengua viva. Informe 2022. Instituto Cervantes. [URL]
International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. T. (2000). Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology, 17 (2), 187–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kijak, A. M. (2009). How stressful is L2 stress? A cross-linguistic study of L2 perception and production of metrical systems. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kissling, E. (2013). Teaching pronunciation: Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners? Modern Language Journal, 97 (3), 720–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koreman, J. (2018). Category similarity in multilingual pronunciation training. Proceeding of Interspeech 2018, Hyderabad, India, 2578–2582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koreman, J., Bech, Ø., Husby, O. & Wik, P. (2011). L1-L2map: A tool for multi-lingual contrastive analysis. Proceedings of the 17th Int. Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS2011), Hong Kong, 1142–1145.Google Scholar
Koreman, J., Husby, O., Hedayatfar, K. & Bech, Ø. (2015). Learning from L2 learners to improve CAPT [Conference paper]. ICPhS satellite workshop Phonetic Learner Corpora, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Kuhl, P. K. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 259–274). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics and Language Teachers. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lahoz, J. M. (2012). Syllable, accent, rhythm: Typological and methodological considerations for teaching Spanish as a foreign language. Revista Internacional de Lenguas Extranjeras, 1 1, 129–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, L. (2003). Second Language Data and Constraints on Manner: Explaining Substitutions for the English Interdentals. Second Language Research, 19 1, 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, G. (2005). Can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 88 (3), 557–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I., Flavier, S., Marsico, E., & Pellegrino, F. (2014–2016). LAPSyD: Lyon-Albuquerque Phonological Systems Databases (Version 1.0.) [Database]. Retrieved March, 11, 2022, from [URL]
Mairano, P., & Calabrò, L. (2016). Are minimal pairs too few to be used in L2 pronunciation classes? In R. Savy & I. Alfano (Eds.), La fonetica sperimentale nell’insegnamento e nell’apprendimento delle lingue straniere. Phonetics and language learning (pp. 255–268). Collana Studi AISV II. Officinaventuno.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. (2018). El uso de la información silábica y contrastiva de L1-L2map en la enseñanza de la pronunciación del español. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 76 1, 129–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker Jones, ʻŌ. (2018). Hawaiian. Journal of the Phonetic Association, 48 (1), 103–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paredes García, F. (2013). La enseñanza de la pronunciación en Español como Lengua Extranjera: cuestiones de método. Lingüística en la red, 1–30.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. Laboratory phonology, 7 1, 203–240.Google Scholar
RAE & ASALE (Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española) (2011). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Fonética y fonología. Espasa.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62 (4), 1231–1258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, S. H. (1996). Minimal segments in second language phonology. In A. James & J. Leather (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar