The vocabulary of emotion terms has been treated both within and across cultures. Emotion terms, especially terms of universal emotion concepts, have been largely discussed. What has received little or no attention at all is the state of no emotion. The paper explores this state in English and Greek. It discusses the terms and the mechanisms (metaphors and metonymies) that feature in expressions showing no emotion. It will be argued (a) that the interplay between metaphor and metonymy is a very important operation for the conceptualization of no emotion; (b) in addition to shared experience, the culture-specific schemas govern this state in the two languages.
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 31–58). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dirven, R. (2002). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75–111). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Flavell, L., & Flavell R. (2006). Dictionary of idioms and their origins. London: Kyle Cathie Ltd.
Gibbs, R.W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340.
Hobbs, J.R., & Gordon, A.S. (2011). The deep lexical semantics of emotions. In A. Khurshid (Ed.), Affective computing and sentiment analysis: Emotion, metaphor and terminology (pp. 27–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R.W. (2009). Metonymic grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lascaratou, C., & Marmaridou, S. (2005). Metaphor in Greek pain-constructions: Cognitive-functional perspectives. In S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou & E. Antonopoulou (Eds.), Reviewing linguistic thought: Converging trends for the 21st century (pp. 235–254). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marmaridou, S. (2006). On the conceptual, cultural and discursive motivation of Greek pain lexicalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 393–434.
Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L., & Barcelona, A. (Eds.). (2009). Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Radden, G. (2003). How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407–434). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2007). High-level cognitive models: in search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., & Peña, S. (Eds.), (2005). Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Pérez, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 261, 1–25.
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.). (2008). Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Veloudis, Y. (2012). Tapeini Glossa, Tipiki Loγiki kai anθropino Vioma. Nisos. Aθina.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.