Article published in:Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2014) ► pp. 118–139
Lexicography and cognitive linguistics
The lexicon of a language is not an unstructured list of words. In this paper, we exemplify some of the basic conceptual structures that cognitive linguists work with and we discuss their potential applications to lexicographic work. Specifically, we focus on the possible advantages of using cognitive linguistics as a theoretical background in the structuring of entries, meanings, and idioms in dictionaries. In connection with these organizational issues, we discuss the knowledge-based organization of the mental lexicon (known as conceptual frames), and a type of organization of the mental lexicon that seems to be much more characteristic of Hungarian than of English: organization according to certain “root morphemes.” We also deal with the conceptualization of an element within a topic area through another element within the same topic area (known as conceptual metonymy), the conceptualization of a topic area in terms of another topic area (known as conceptual metaphor); and the internal organization of the various senses of a word-concept (known as polysemy). We devote a section to idioms and their role as well as possible arrangement in the dictionary. Such thematic structures have, on the whole, remained outside the focus of everyday lexicographic practice. Here, we hope to demonstrate their importance and usefulness.
Keywords: frames, roots, dictionaries, metonymy, metaphor
Published online: 08 August 2014
Atkins, B.T.S., & Bouillon, P.
Atkins, B.T.S., Fillmore, C.J., & Johnson, C.R.
Beréndi, M., Csábi, S., & Kövecses, Z.
de Schryver, G.-M.
Fillmore, C.J., & Atkins, B.T.S.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P.
Kövecses, Z., Tóth, M., & Babarci, B.
(2007) Linguistic semantics and lexicography: A troubled relationship. Accessed online at http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~rlew/pub/Lew_2007_Linguistic_semantics_and_lexicography.doc.
to appear). Szótár, enciklopédia és tipológia. In Z. Fábián & É, Szöllősy (Eds.) Szótár, lexikon, enciklopédia: Kérdések és problémák Budapest Tinta
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(2012) ‘It works in practice but will it work in theory?’: The uneasy relationship between lexicography and matters theoretical. In R.V. Fjeld & J.M. Torjusen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Euralex international congress, EURALEX 2012 (pp. 47–92). Oslo: University of Oslo. Accessed online at http://www.euralex.org/elx_proceedings/Euralex2012/pp47-92%20Rundell.pdf.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P.
Cited by 3 other publications
Verdaguer, Isabel & Judy Noguchi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.