Article published in:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2014) ► pp. 118–139

Lexicography and cognitive linguistics

| Eötvös Loránd University
The lexicon of a language is not an unstructured list of words. In this paper, we exemplify some of the basic conceptual structures that cognitive linguists work with and we discuss their potential applications to lexicographic work. Specifically, we focus on the possible advantages of using cognitive linguistics as a theoretical background in the structuring of entries, meanings, and idioms in dictionaries. In connection with these organizational issues, we discuss the knowledge-based organization of the mental lexicon (known as conceptual frames), and a type of organization of the mental lexicon that seems to be much more characteristic of Hungarian than of English: organization according to certain “root morphemes.” We also deal with the conceptualization of an element within a topic area through another element within the same topic area (known as conceptual metonymy), the conceptualization of a topic area in terms of another topic area (known as conceptual metaphor); and the internal organization of the various senses of a word-concept (known as polysemy). We devote a section to idioms and their role as well as possible arrangement in the dictionary. Such thematic structures have, on the whole, remained outside the focus of everyday lexicographic practice. Here, we hope to demonstrate their importance and usefulness.
Keywords: frames, roots, dictionaries, metonymy, metaphor
Published online: 08 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.05kov
References

References

Andor, J.
(1985) On the psychological relevance of frames. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 212–221.Google Scholar
Atkins, B.T.S., & Bouillon, P.
(2006) Relevance in dictionary making: Sense indicators in the bilingual entry. In L. Bowker (Ed.), Lexicography, terminology, and translation: Text-based studies in honour of Ingrid Meyer (pp. 25–43). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, B.T.S., Fillmore, C.J., & Johnson, C.R.
(2003) Lexicographic relevance: Selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 251–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beréndi, M., Csábi, S., & Kövecses, Z.
(2008) Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 65–100). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boers, F.
(1997) No pain, no gain: A test for cognitive semantics? Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 231–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Expanding learners’ vocabulary through metaphor awareness: What expansion, what learners, what vocabulary? In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 211–232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csábi, S.
(2002) Polysemous words, idioms and conceptual metaphors: Cognitive linguistics and lexicography. Proceedings of the tenth Euralex international congress, EURALEX 2002 . Vol. 1 (pp. 249–254). Copenhagen:Center for Sprogteknologi.Google Scholar
(2004) A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Schryver, G.-M.
(2003) Lexicographers’ dreams in the electronic-dictionary age. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(2), 143–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J.
(1977) The case for case reopened. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 8: Grammatical relations(pp. 59–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., & Atkins, B.T.S.
(1998) FrameNet and lexicographic relevance. In Proceedings of the first international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 98) , Granada, Spain (pp. 417–423). Paris: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(1991) Happiness: A definitional effort. (1991). Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6(1), 29–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) American friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 315–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) The scope of metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 79–92). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010)[2002] Metaphor: A practical introduction. (Exercises written with S. Csábi, R. Hajdú, Zs. Bokor & O. Izsó). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P.
(1996) Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17, 326–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., Tóth, M., & Babarci, B.
(1998) A picture dictionary of English idioms (4 volumes). Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.Google Scholar
Kwary, D.A.
(2012) Adaptive hypermedia and user-oriented data for online dictionaries: A case study on an English dictionary of finance for Indonesian students. International Journal of Lexicography, 25(1), 30–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. In B. Hallet (Ed.), Engulfed in war: Just war and the Persian Gulf (pp. 463–481). Honolulu: Matsunaga Institute for Peace.Google Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lew, R.
(2007) Linguistic semantics and lexicography: A troubled relationship. Accessed online at http://​www​.staff​.amu​.edu​.pl​/~rlew​/pub​/Lew​_2007​_Linguistic​_semantics​_and​_lexicography​.doc.
Magay, T.
to appear). Szótár, enciklopédia és tipológia. In Z. Fábián & É, Szöllősy (Eds.) Szótár, lexikon, enciklopédia: Kérdések és problémák Budapest Tinta
Moon, R.E.
(2004) On specifying metaphor: An idea and its implementation. International Journal of Lexicography, 17(2), 195–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M.
(2012) ‘It works in practice but will it work in theory?’: The uneasy relationship between lexicography and matters theoretical. In R.V. Fjeld & J.M. Torjusen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Euralex international congress, EURALEX 2012 (pp. 47–92). Oslo: University of Oslo. Accessed online at http://​www​.euralex​.org​/elx​_proceedings​/Euralex2012​/pp47​-92%20Rundell​.pdf.Google Scholar
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1985) Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Zgusta, L.
(1992) The Czech–Chinese Dictionary and the theory of lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 5(2), 85–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cacchiani, Silvia
2017. Ostermann, C. (2015). Cognitive Lexicography: A new approach to lexicography making use of cognitive semantics . Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 662 ff. Crossref logo
Storjohann, Petra
2017. Cognitive descriptions in a corpus-based dictionary of German paronyms. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 5:1 Crossref logo
Verdaguer, Isabel & Judy Noguchi
2018. Identifying verb collocational patterns in a specialized medical journal corpus. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 660 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.