Complex predicates and light verb constructions in Modern Irish
Brian Nolan | Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, Dublin
This paper characterises complex predicates and light verb constructions in Modern Irish. Light verbs are attested in many of the world’s languages (Alsina, Bresnan & Sells, 2001; Butt, 1995, 2003). Cross linguistically, there appears to be a common class of verbs involved in these constructions and generally there is agreement that light verbs contribute to the formation of complex predicates. Light verbs seem have a non-light or ‘heavy’ verb counterpart. In this paper we discuss the light verb constructions (LVC) as found in modern Irish and how they form complex predicates. We claim that the light verb (LV) encodes the event process initiation (or cause) and the matrix verb indicates the bounded component or result. In light verb constructions, the matrix verb appears in Modern Irish syntax as a verbal-noun form. The function of light verbs in these constructions is to modulate the event and sub-event semantics. We distinguish between auxiliary verbs constructions (AVC) and those constructions involving complex predicated and light verbs (Aikhenvald & Dixon, 2006; Anderson, 2006). We provide evidence based on an analysis of Irish data that shows how aspect and argument structure considerations are resolved for the complex predicate within the light verb construction via the linking system between semantics and syntax. We motivate a functional account, based on Role and Reference Grammar (Nolan, 2012; Nolan & Diedrichsen, 2013; Van Valin, 2005; Van Valin & LaPolla, 1997), that appeals to the analysis of complex predicates within a consideration of the layered structure of the clause.
Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2006). Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M. Dixon (Eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, A.Y., & Dixon, R.M. (Eds.). (2006). Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., & Sells, P. (Eds.). (2001). Complex predicates. Stanford, California: CSLI.
Anderson, G.S. (2006). Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. New York: Oxford University.
Butt, M. (1995). The structure of complex predicates in Urdu. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Butt, M. (2003). The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, 91, 1-49. [Accessed in February 2014] [URL]
Cristofaro, S. (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freed, F.A. (1979). The semantics of English aspectual complementation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Siegel, M., & Bender, E.M. (2002). Efficient deep processing of Japanese. In
Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Asian language resources and international standardization at the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
.
Solnit, D.B. (2006). Verb serialization in Eastern Kayah Li. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M. Dixon (Eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 144-159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Toratani, K. (2002). The morphosyntactic structure and logical structures of compound verbs in Japanese. PhD Thesis. University of New York at Buffalo.
Van Valin, R.D. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin, R.D., & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.