Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:1 (2015) ► pp.258–272

Effect of textual enhancement on idioms

An exploratory study with Spanish students

| Universitat Jaume I, Spain
The present study aimed at investigating the impact of textual enhancement on the comprehension of transparent and opaque English idioms among Spanish lower-intermediate students studying English as a foreign language. Two short texts including visually enhanced idioms (i.e., they were underlined) were designed for the Experimental Group, and the Control Group received an unenhanced version of the texts. The results reveal that textual enhancement made transparent idioms salient enough for them to have an impact on comprehension; however, underlining had a poorer effect on comprehension as far as opaque idioms are concerned. In addition, we aimed at examining the effect of textual enhancement on the noticing of idioms. Findings show that it did not have a positive effect on recognition of idioms, since the Control Group outperformed the Experimental Group in the multiple-choice task.
Keywords: transparent and opaque idioms, underlining, textual enhancement, comprehension
Published online: 10 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.1.12sal
References (28)
Alcón, E., & Codina, V. (1996). The impact of gender on negotiation and vocabulary learning in a situation of interaction. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 121, 21–35.Google Scholar
Bishop, H. (2004). The effect of typographic salience on the look up and comprehension of unknown formulaic sequences. En N. Schmidt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 83–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2005). The relation between children’s reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 901, 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, T.C. (1998). Teaching idioms. Foreign Language Annals, 311, 255–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (1988). The effects of instruction on the acquisition of relativization in English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 131, 431–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irujo, S. (1993). Steering clear: A voidance on the production of idioms. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 311, 205–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S. (2003). Visual input enhancement as focus on form. Sophia Linguistica, 511, 1–30.Google Scholar
Jackson, H., & Amvela, E.Z. (2000). Words, meaning and vocabulary. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jiménez Catalán, R.M. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 131, 54–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing?: A think-aloud analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 83–216). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1977). Towards a characterization of the strategies of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 21, 58–145.Google Scholar
Lee, S.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive voice. Language Learning, 571, 87–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217–258). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Leow, R. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 221, 557–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R., Egi, T., Nuevo, A.M., & Tsai, Y.C. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 131, 1–16.Google Scholar
Nassaji, N. (1999). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: some pedagogical possibilities. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 551, 385–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: the focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 21, 229–258.Google Scholar
Petchko, K. (2011). Input enhancement, noticing, and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Asian EFL Journal 131: 228–255.Google Scholar
Rosa, E., & O’Neil, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece of the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 511–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 371, 124–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus-on-form in second language classroom acquisition (pp. 91–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winis, N., & Zakaria, M. (2013). Investigating the difficulties faced in understanding, and strategies used in processing, English idioms by Libyan students. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 11, 69–90.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language?: An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Suhad Sonbul & Rawan Alwazzan
2022. Learning phrasal verbs in the EFL classroom: the effect of prior vocabulary knowledge and opacity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1253 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Suhad Sonbul & Rawan Alwazzan
2022. Learning phrasal verbs in the EFL classroom: the effect of prior vocabulary knowledge and opacity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1253 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.