Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2015) ► pp.349–381

Acquisitional patterns of Spanish anticausative se

The end of the road

| University of Memphis
The acquisition of the Spanish morpheme se has proved to be problematic for L2 learners both because of its polyfunctionality and because of the restrictions regarding the types of predicates with which it can combine. This paper sheds light on this problem by focusing on a specific type of se (anticausative se; e.g., El jarrón se rompió ‘The vase broke’) and exploring its acquisition across four proficiency levels. Results of a scalar grammaticality judgment task indicate that lower-proficiency participants’ performance is in line with previous research, which claims that this aspect of Spanish grammar is particularly challenging for L2 learners (as reflected in omission and overgeneralization errors). However, the near-native group shows sensitivity to the abstract features that uniquely characterize verbs that undergo the causative/inchoative alternation. Thus, the current findings suggest that L2 learners manage to overcome the problems experienced at lower levels and, in fact, do succeed at the level of ultimate attainment.
Keywords: alternating and non-alternating unaccusative predicates, unergative predicates, anticausative se, L1 transfer, ultimate attainment
Published online: 19 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.2.01gom
References (55)
Aranovich, R. (2000). Spanish inchoatives and the semantics of split intransitivity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , Chicago.
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 561, 9–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1999). The se constructions in Spanish and near-native competence. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 247–296.Google Scholar
. (2011). Subject/object asymmetries in the grammar of bilingual and monolingual Spanish speakers: Evidence against connectionism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(2), 111–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government and binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, M., & Zubizarreta, M.L. (2003). On the acquisition of Spanish causative structures by L1 speakers of English. In J.M. Liceras, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002) (pp. 24–33). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. (2005). Overgeneralization of causatives and transfer in L2 Spanish and L2 English. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 15–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1989). A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. Ms.,Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1981). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 32–75). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1988). On si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry, 191, 521–581Google Scholar
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 251, 257–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contreras, H. (1978). El orden de las palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
de Miguel, E. (1992). El aspecto en la sintaxis del español: Perfectividad e imperfectividad. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 671, 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 91–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59, Supplement 1, 93–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C., O’Donnell, M.B., & Römer, U. (2013). Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63, Supplement 1, 25–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Soler, I. (2013). Aspectual differences with syntactic consequences: Argument structure alternations in L2 Spanish. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 12)(pp. 50–59). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Google Scholar
. (2014). The logical problem of L2 acquisition of argument structure: Recognizing aspectual distinctions in Spanish psych-predicates. International Journal of Bilingualism. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2004). Romance se as an aspectual element. In J. Auger, J.C. Clements, & B.Vance (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 33rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 239–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
King, L.D., & Suñer, M. (2007). Gramatica española: Análisis y práctica. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, A. (2009). Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(1), 77–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity at the syntax semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (1999). Causative errors with unaccusative verbs in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 15(2), 191–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Transitive alternations in L2 acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001a). First-language constrained variability in the second language acquisition of argument structure-changing morphology with causative verbs. Second Language Research, 17(2), 144–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001b). Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), 171–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In J.J. Jaeger, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 157–189). Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York, NY: William Morrow and Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PsyScope X Project. (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2015, from [URL]
Reinhart, T. (2000). The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers, 00.01/TL.Google Scholar
. (2002). The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28(3), 229–290.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T., & Siloni, T. (2005). The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, C. (1984). The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations. In D. Perlmutter & C. Rosen (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar 2 (pp. 38–77). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2008). Poverty of the stimulus and L2 epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 15(4), 270–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. (1998). The second language instinct. Lingua, 1061, 133–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9(1), 22–47 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2000). Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language, 76(4), 859–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Near-nativeness. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–152). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E. (1989). Unergative-unaccusative alternations in Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 101, 253–269.Google Scholar
Toth, P.D. (1999). Preemption in instructed learners of Spanish as a foreign language: Acquiring a rule for se. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 195–246.Google Scholar
. (2000). The interaction of instruction and learner-internal factors in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(2), 169–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, P.D., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2013). The impact of instruction on second-language implicit knowledge: Evidence against encapsulation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(6), 1163–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2006). On the second language acquisition of Spanish reflexive passives and reflexive impersonals by French- and English-speaking adults. Second Language Research, 22(1), 30–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, E. (2006). L2 end state grammars and incomplete acquisition of the Spanish CLLD constructions. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prévost, Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White. (pp. 283–304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2008). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language, 661, 221–260 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. French Language Studies, 1(2), 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1981). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review, 11, 81–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zyzik, E. (2006). Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: Insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 449–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gonzalez, Becky
2023. Syntactic licensing in heritage Spanish: Psych verbs and the middle voice. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:5 ► pp. 776 ff. DOI logo
Fábregas, Antonio
2021. SE in Spanish. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.