Cover not available
Article published In:
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2015) ► pp.442–464

The discourses of sustainability in news magazines

The rhetorical construction of journalistic stance

| Centro Universitario de la Defensa — University of Zaragoza
Sustainability has become a key concept in the debate over global environmental challenges. With the view that at the heart of the environmental debate is undoubtedly the text, this paper examines the rhetorical construction of text and provides linguistic insights into how the concept of sustainability is textualized. Corpus findings show that the discourse of sustainability is constructed by interwoven discourses which depict sustainability as a goal, as a problem, or as an object of analysis or study and implemented by companies and institutions. The rhetorical construction of the argumentation of the discourses of sustainability further suggests that the news magazines convey a multiplicity of obvious or hidden communicative purposes. This paper critically examines how resources such as evaluation, hedging or intertextuality are used in journalistic discourse to convey the author’s stance towards sustainability, trying to position the audience and thus to shape the public awareness and acceptance of sustainability.
Keywords: evaluation, communicative purpose, news magazines, argumentation, positioning, stance, sustainability
Published online: 19 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.28.2.04orn
References (61)
Alexander, R. (2009). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allen, M., Walker, K., & Brady, R. (2012). Sustainability discourse within a supply chain relationship: Mapping convergence and divergence. Journal of Business Communication, 49(3), 210–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Askehave, I., & Swales, J.M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Costas, G., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy?: Combining corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2010). Playing with environmental stories in the news: Good or bad practice? Discourse & Communication, 4(1), 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). ‘Value added’: Language, image and news values. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(1), 103–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bocking, S. (2012). Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 705–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boykoff, M., & Boykoff, J. (2005). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buettner, A. (2010). Climate change in the media: Climate denial, Ian Plimer, and the staging of public debate. New Zealand Journal of Media Studies, 12(1), 79–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calsamiglia, H., & van Dijk, T. (2004). Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse & Society, 15(4), 369–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re–reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cronin, B. (1998). Metatheorizing citation. Scientometrics, 43(1), 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doulton, H., & Brown, K. (2008). Ten years to prevent catastrophe?: Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 191–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. (2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T. (2012). Different contexts, different “stories”?: A linguistic comparison of two development reports on climate change. Language & Communication, 32(1), 14–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuoli, M. (2012). Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication, 6(1), 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grundmann R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4(2), 125–146.Google Scholar
Higgins, C., & Walker, R. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 194–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmgreen, L., & Vestergaard, T. (2009). Evaluation and audience acceptance in biotech news texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 586–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.) (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koteyko, N. (2012). Managing carbon emissions: A discursive presentation of ‘market–driven sustainability’ in the British media. Language & Communication, 32(1), 24–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, D. (1997). Environmental management as political sustainability. Organization & Environment, 10(2), 126–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livesey, S., Hartman, C., Stafford, E., & Shearer, M. (2009). Performing sustainable development through eco–collaboration: The Ricelands Habitat Partnership. Journal of Business Communication, 46(4), 423–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer–The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M., & Hunter, D. (2013). The discourse of Olympic security: London 2012. Discourse & Society, 24(1), 66–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, S.P. (2005). The Language of journalism in treatments of hormone replacement news. Written Communication, 22(3), 275–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2007). Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development . In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 191–218). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P., & Peace, A. (2006). Environmental discourses. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 351, 457–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility?: Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, D. (2012). Stancing: Strategies of entextualizing stance in newswriting. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 135–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, M. (2012). Taking stock: A meta–analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2005). Meaning in the framework of corpus linguistics. In W. Teubert & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), The corpus approach to lexicography. Thematic part of Lexicographica: Internationales Jahrbuch fuer Lexikographie, 20, 2004 (pp. 20–32). Tübingen: Niemeyer,Google Scholar
Stenvall, M. (2008). On emotions and the journalistic ideals of factuality and objectivity: Tools for analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), 1569–1586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies in lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 297–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, T., Vertommen, B., & Pounds, G. (2012). Analyzing the view from here, there and nowhere: Discursive approaches to journalistic stance. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 55–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vertommen, B., Vandendaele, A., & van Praet, E. (2012). Towards a multidimensional approach to journalistic stance: Analyzing foreign media coverage of Belgium. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vis, K., Sanders, J., & Spooren, W. (2012). Diachronic changes in subjectivity and stance: A corpus linguistic study of Dutch news texts. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 55–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waller, R., & Conaway, R. (2011). Framing and counterframing the issue of corporate social responsibility: The communication strategies of Nikebiz.com. Journal of Business Communication, 9(1), 297–312.Google Scholar
White, P. (2006). Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. In I. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (pp. 37–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, P.R.R. (2012). Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2-3), 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Woods, R., Fernández, A., & Coen, S. (2012). The use of religious metaphors by UK newspapers to describe and denigrate climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 323–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mateja, Dagmara
2024. Zmiany klimatu w dyskursie „Gazety Wyborczej” i „Rzeczpospolitej” w latach 2015–2022: ujęcie korpusowe. Prace Językoznawcze 26:3 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming & Jingyi Huang
2022. “Climate change” vs. “global warming”: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of two popular terms in The New York Times . Journal of World Languages 8:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.