Article published in:
The Acquisition and Processing of Spanish and Portuguese Morphosyntax: Theoretical and experimental issues
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Anahí Alba de la Fuente, Joanne Markle LaMontagne and Almudena Basanta y Romero-Valdespino
[Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:2] 2016
► pp. 396–428

Look before you move

Clitic Left Dislocation in combination with other elements in the Spanish left periphery

| University of Nevada, Reno
The present study examines whether, as proposed by the Interface Hypothesis (Sorace, 2011), the syntax-discourse interface is especially vulnerable to non-native optionality even at very advanced levels. I focus on the acquisition of Clitic Left Dislocation in Spanish (CLLD), a structure that involves both syntax and discourse, when it combines with other structures at the left periphery (iterative topics, Fronted Focus, and wh-constructions). CLLD is a realization of topicalization requiring the integration of syntactic and discourse knowledge. This study provides data from an audio-visual rating task completed by 120 learners of Spanish of different proficiency levels and 27 monolingual native speakers. Results showed evidence that the most advanced learners had acquired the restrictions of these structures in a native-like way and supports López’s (2009) syntactic analysis of CLLD, whereby CLLD is generated through movement so that the pragmatic features [+anaphor]/[+contrast] can be assigned to the dislocated element.
Keywords: Spanish, Interface Hypothesis, information structure, L2 learners, Clitic Left Dislocation, syntax-discourse interface
Published online: 02 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.29.2.02lea
References
Anagnostopoulou, E
(1997) Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In E. Anagnostopoulou, H. van Riemsdijk, & F. Zwarts (Eds.), Materials on left dislocation (pp. 151–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arregi, K
(2003) Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. In E. Kaiser & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Penn linguistics colloquium. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P
(2001) On inversion in WH-questions in Romance. In A. Hulk & J.Y. Pollock (Eds.), Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar (pp. 20–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A
(2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(4), 657–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benincà, P., & Poletto, C
(2004) Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP (pp. 52–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I., Green, D.W., & Gollan, T.H
(2009) Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(3), 89–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V., & Frascarelli, M
(2010) Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 21, 43–88.Google Scholar
Bley‐Vroman, R
(1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C
(2001) Scope reconstruction and A-movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19(3), 503–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borgonovo, C., Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Prévost, P
(2015) Mood selection in relative clauses: Interfaces and variability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 33–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Montrul, S
(1996) Verb movement and clitic placement in French and Spanish as a second language. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 123–34). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Campos, H., & Zampini, M
(1990) Focalization strategies in Spanish. Probus, 2(1), 47–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E
(2003) Left-dislocated structures in Spanish. Hispania, 861, 326–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The syntax-information structure interface. New York: Garland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin, C.P. Otero, & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G
(1977) The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 397–411.Google Scholar
(1990) Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, H
(1976) A theory of word order with special reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Davies, M
(2015) Corpus del español: 100 million words, 1200s-1900s. Available online at http://​www​.corpusdelespanol​.org.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R.A
(2006) The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M.G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 33–40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
Donaldson, B
(2011) Left dislocation in near-native French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 399–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, J
(2004) Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In D. Adger, C. de Cat, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects (pp. 75–120). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N
(1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, I
(2014) Modeling individual variation in prosody: The case of clitic left-dislocations in Spanish. In S. Fuchs, M. Grice, A. Hermes, L. Lancia, & D. Mücke (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th international seminar on speech production (ISSP), Cologne (Germany) (pp. 114–117). Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Fernández-Rubiera, F
(2009) Clitics at the edge: Clitic placement in Western Iberian Romance languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A
(1983) The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, D.W
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J.K
(1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. Studies in Syntactic Typology, 171, 209–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Topic, focus, and the grammar-pragmatics interface. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 6(1), 14.Google Scholar
Hertel, T.J
(2003) Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of word of Spanish word order. Second Language Research, 19(4), 273–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, I.P
(2012) L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic doubling: A test case for the Interface Hypothesis. Second Language Research, 28(3), 345–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, P
(2013) CLLD as a window on the left periphery. In C. Howe, S.E. Blackwell, & M. Libbers Quesada (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 310–327). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kiss, K.E
(1998) Multiple topic, one focus? Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 45(1-2), 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M
(2008) Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3-4), 243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J.F., Bobb, S.C., Misra, M., & Guo, T
(2008) Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 416–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leal, T., Slabakova, R., & Farmer, T.A
in press). Fine-tuning of linguistic expectations over the course of learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Crossref
Leal Méndez, T., Slabakova, R., & Rothman, J
(2015) Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish. Lingua, 1551, 85–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, L
(2009) A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C
(2006) Focus and split intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 22(2), 145–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M
(2003) Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S
(2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T
(2006) Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) On the position ‘int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. In G. Cinque & G. Salvi (Eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi (pp. 287–296). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P
(2008) Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 333–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, M
(1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J
(1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rothman, J
(2009) Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 951–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R
(2011) The mind-context divide: On acquisition at the linguistic interfaces. Lingua, 121(4), 568–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R
(2015) The effect of construction frequency and native transfer on second language knowledge of the syntax–discourse interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 671–699. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Ivanov, I
(2011) A more careful look at the syntax-discourse interface. Lingua, 121(4), 637–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J
(2012) Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Rothman, J., Leal Méndez, T., Campos, G., & Kempchinsky, P
(2011) Pragmatic features at the L2 syntax-discourse interface. In N. Davis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), BUCLD 35 proceedings (pp. 564–576). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Sorace, A
(2003) Near-nativeness. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M
(2006) Left dislocations with and without epithets. Probus, 18(1), 127–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E
(1996) The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, E., & Vilkuna, M
(1998) On rheme and kontrast. In W. Abraham (Ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania (pp. 79–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, X
(2000) The syntax of sentence periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ward, G.L
(1988) The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska–Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y.K.I
(2004) Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 105–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K
(2002) The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L
(1998) Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Hoot, Bradley & Tania Leal
2022. Crosslinguistic influence from Catalan and Yucatec Maya on judgments and processing of Spanish focus. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism Crossref logo
Jin, Jing & Sihui Ke
2021. Second Language Acquisition at Interfaces: A Study of the Word Order Variation in the Chinese Nominal Domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:3 ► pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo
Jin, Jing, Sihui Echo Ke & John Chi-Kin Lee
2022. Language Interfaces in Adult Heritage Language Acquisition: A Study on Encoding of Nominal Reference in Mandarin Chinese as a Heritage Language. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
López-Beltrán, Priscila, Michael A Johns, Paola E Dussias, Cristóbal Lozano & Alfonso Palma
2021. The effects of information structure in the processing of word order variation in the second language. Second Language Research ► pp. 026765832199246 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.