Article published In:
The Acquisition and Processing of Spanish and Portuguese Morphosyntax: Theoretical and experimental issues
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Anahí Alba de la Fuente, Joanne Markle LaMontagne and Almudena Basanta y Romero-Valdespino
[Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:2] 2016
► pp. 544581
Aissen, J
(2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 211, 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arregi, K
(2003) Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Belletti, A
(2005) Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus, 171, 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belloro, V
(2007) Spanish clitic doubling: A study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. PhD. Dissertation, SUNY.Google Scholar
Beukema, F., & den Dikken, M
(Eds.) (2000) Clitic phenomena in European languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleam, T
(1999) Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Bonet i Alsina, M.E
(1995) Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 131, 607–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, G
(1985) Empirische Universalienforschung, Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(2003) Nominal and/or verbal marking of central actants. In G. Fiorentino (Ed.), Romance objects: Transitivity in Romance languages (pp. 17–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, J., & Sánchez, L
(2002) Explaining clitic variation in Spanish. In M. Amberber & P. Collins (Eds.), Language universals and variation (pp. 21–41). Westport, CT/London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A
(2002) Against optional and null clitics: Right dislocation vs. marginali-zation. Studia Linguistica, 561, 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E
(2004) The syntax-information structure interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, C
(1999) A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studio Linguistica, 531, 40–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus, 12(1), 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, R
(1987) Lingüística quechua. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
Cerrón Palomino, R
(2003) Castellano andino: Aspectos sociolingüísticos, pedagógicos y gramaticales. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Choi, J.K
(2000) [-Person] direct object drop: The genetic cause of a syntactic feature in Paraguayan Spanish. Hispania, 831, 531–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B
(2003) When agreement gets trigger-happy. Transactions of the Philological Society, 231, 50–61.Google Scholar
Cuervo, M.C
(2003) Datives at large. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Cusihuamán, A
(2001) Gramática quechua. 2nd edition. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., & Nikolaeva, I
(2011) Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Tullio, A., & Zdrojewski, P
(2006) Notas sobre el doblado de clíticos en el español Rioplatense: Asimetrías entre objetos humanos y no humanos. Filología, 11, 13–44.Google Scholar
Escobar, A
(1978) Variaciones sociolingüísticas del castellano en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Escobar, A.M
(1990) Los bilingües y el castellano en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
(2000) Contacto social y lingüístico: El español en contacto con el quechua en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, I
(1994) Isoglosas internas del castellano: El sistema referencialdel pronombre átono de tercera persona. Revista de Filología Española, 741, 71–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, J
(1993) On object agreement in Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California. [Distributed by GSIL Publications, USC Linguistics].Google Scholar
Franco, J., & Huidobro, S
(2008) Ethical datives, clitic doubling and the theory of pro. In J. Bruhn de Garavito & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 215–224). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
García Tesoro, A.I
(2010) Español en contacto con el tzutujil en Guatemala: Cambios en el sistema pronominal átono de tercera persona. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 133–156.Google Scholar
Givón, T
Granda, G. de
(1988) Notas sobre retenciones sintácticas en el español de Paraguay. Lexis, 121, 43–67.Google Scholar
Harris, J
(1995) The morphology of Spanish clitics. In H. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honour of Carlos Otero (pp. 169–197). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O
(1986) Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction. In H. Borer (Ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics (pp. 15–42). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R
(1975) French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Null subject and clitic climbing. In K. Safir & O. Jaeggli (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 239–261). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 221, 647–686.Google Scholar
Klee, C., & Caravedo, R
(2005) Contact-induced language change in Lima. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 12–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landa, A., & Franco, J
(1992) Objetos nulos en el castellano del País Vasco (CV): Dos estatus para dos interpretaciones. ASJU International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, 31, 777–792.Google Scholar
(1999) Converging and diverging grammars. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, 33(2), 569–581.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D
(1998) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 141, 359–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, R.A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th generative approaches to second language acquisition (GASLA 2004) (pp. 178–92). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M
(2007) Clitics do not encode specificity. In G. Kaiser & M. Leonetti (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages” (pp. 111–140). Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Lipski, J
(1994) Latin American Spanish. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
López, L
(2001) On the (non)complementarity of θ-theory and checking theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 461, 657–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luján, M
(1987) Clitic-doubling in Andean Spanish and the theory of case absorption. In T. Morgan, J. Lee, & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Language and language use: Studies in Spanish (pp. 109–121). Washington: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Luján, M., & Parodi, T
(1996) Clitic doubling and the acquisition of agreement in Spanish. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & L. Silva-Villar (Eds.), Perspectives on Spanish linguistics (pp. 119–138). Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
Mayer, E
(2006) Optional direct object clitic doubling in Limeño Spanish. In M. Butt & T. King Holloway (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG06 conference (pp. 310–327). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2008) Clitics on the move: From dependent marking to split marking. In M. Butt & T. King Holloway (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG08 conference (pp. 352- 372). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2010) Syntactic variation of object arguments in Limeño Spanish Contact Varieties. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
(2013) Floating agreement in American Spanish leísta dialects. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 152–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Spanish clitics on the move: Variation in time and space. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo
Mayer, E., & Delicado, M
(2015) Continuity and contact-induced change in Peruvian Spanish contact varieties: The case of prepositional differential object marking. In M. González -Rivera & S. Sessarego (Eds.), New perspectives on Hispanic contact linguistics in the Americas (pp. 99–120). Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Mayer, M., & Mayer, M
(1992) One frog too many. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, C
(2008) Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24(4), 459–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I
(2001) Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics, 391, 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F
(1998) Post-verbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 161, 313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F., & Repetti, L
(2006) Stressed enclitics? In J.P. Montreuil (Ed.), New analyses on Romance linguistics, Volume II: Phonetics, phonology and dialectology (pp. 167–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J
(2013) Differential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2(2), 221–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, J
(2000) Distribución y estructura interna de los clíticos del español: Análisis de cuatro fenómenos desde la Morfología Distribuida. Lexis, 24(2), 259–281.Google Scholar
Rivero, M.L
(1980) On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(2), 363–393.Google Scholar
Roberts, I
(1991) Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry, 221, 209–218.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Mondoñedo. M
(2007) The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object Marking. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Rooryck, J
(2000) Configurations of sentential complementation: Perspectives from Romance languages. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saab, A. & P. Zdrojewski
(2010) Syntactically inert clitics: A paradox involving clitic doubling and its resolution. Paper presented at Romania Nova IV , Campos de Jordão, São Paulo, November 8.
Sánchez, L
(1999) Null objects in contact varieties of Spanish. In J.M. Authier & B. Bullock (Eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics (pp. 227–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Quechua-Spanish bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) La aparente opcionalidad del doblado de clíticos en el español limeño. Cuadernos de la ALFAL, 11, 94–105.Google Scholar
(2015) Right peripheral domains and informational structure in Southern Quechua. In A. Muntendam & M. Manley (Eds.), Quechua expressions of stance and deixis (pp. 287–322). Leiden: Brill Studies in Indigenous Languages of the Americas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, L., & Zdrojewski, P
(2013) Restricciones semánticas y pragmáticas al doblado de clíticos en el español de Buenos Aires y de Lima: La variación en la gramática del español actual. Lingüística, 29(2), 271–320.Google Scholar
Spencer, A., & Luís, A.R
(2012) Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, D
(1996) Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M
(1988) The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6(3), 391–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Dialectal variation and clitic-doubled direct objects. In C. Kirscher & J. Decesaris (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 377–395). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M., & Yépez, M
(1988) Null definite objects in Quiteño. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 511–519.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J
(1995) Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 261, 79–123.Google Scholar
Villalba, X
(2000) The syntax of sentence periphery. PhD Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Weber, D
(1989) A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zagona, K
(2002) The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zdrojewski, P
(2013) Spanish DOM as a case of lacking case. Paper presented at the Differential object marking workshop , University of Tromsø, May 23-24, 2013.
Zdrojewski, P., & Sánchez, L
(2014) Variation in accusative clitic doubling across three Spanish dialects. Lingua, 1511, 162–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L
(1998) Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A
(1985) Clitics and particles. Language, 611, 283–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso
2021. Stylistic Variation and the Role of Dialect Contact in theleísmoof Basque-Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14:1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez, Liliana, José Camacho, Elisabeth Mayer & Carolina Rodríguez Alzza
2022. Gender Agreement in a Language Contact Situation. Languages 7:2  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez, Liliana & Elisabeth Mayer
2018. Typological Differences in Morphological Patterns, Gender Features, and Thematic Structure in the L2 Acquisition of Ashaninka Spanish. Languages 3:2  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.