Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11: Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario
Edited by Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar and Adriana Soto-Corominas
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11] 2017
► pp. 191–207

Chapter 9
Voice quality transfer in the production of Spanish heritage speakers and English L2 learners of Spanish

| University of California, Los Angeles
The present study examines the use of creaky voice in the Spanish of two groups of Spanish-English bilinguals, namely, U.S. heritage speakers of Mexican Spanish and English L2 learners of Spanish. In American English, creaky voice is used utterance-finally, especially among young women, while it has rarely been found in Mexican Spanish. Participants’ H1-H2 values in utterance-final position were calculated to measure the degree of creaky voice and the values were compared to those of monolingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Results showed that while monolinguals did not use creaky voice, both heritage speakers and L2 learners did, especially the female speakers. The findings imply that, like other linguistic features, voice quality can be transferred from one language to another.
Keywords: voice quality transfer, creaky voice, heritage speakers, gender difference
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Creaky voice in American English and Mexican Spanish
    • 2.2Voice quality transfer among bilingual speakers
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials and procedures
    • 3.3Analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.09kim
References
Andrade, Argelia
2003 “Intonational phonology of alteño Spanish.” M.A. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Anderson, Rindy C., Casey A. Klofstad, William J. Mayew, and Mohan Venkatachalam
2014 “Vocal Fry May Undermine the Success of Young Women in the Labor Market.” PLoS ONE 9(5): e97506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Meghan E., Nicholas Henriksen, and Christian DiCanio
2015 “Sociophonetic Analysis of Young Peninsular Spanish Women’s Voice Quality.” In Hispanic Linguistics at the crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013, ed. by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras, and Elena Valenzuela, 293–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benet-Martínez, Verónica, Janxin Leu, Fiona Lee, and Michael W. Morris
2002 “Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame-switching in biculturals with oppositional vs. compatible cultural identities.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33: 492–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz
1947 “Kwakiutl Grammar with a Glossary of the Suffixes” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society ed. by Helene Boas Yampolsky and Zelig Harris, 37(3): 201–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bruyninckx, Marielle, Bernard Harmegnies, Joaquim Llisterri, and Dolors Poch
1994 “Language-induced voice quality variability in bilinguals.” Journal of Phonetics 22: 19–31.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1986 Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Colton Raymond H, Janina K. Casper, and Rebecca Leonard
2011 Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perceptive for Diagnosis and Treatment. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Dilley, Laura, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, and Mari Ostendorf
1996 “Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure.” Journal of Phonetics 24: 423–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H.
1978 Voice Quality in Edinburgh: A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Study, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
1982 “Pronunciation Consideration in ESL: Voice Quality Settings.” Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria 2 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
1984 “Laryngographic study of phonation type and laryngeal configuration.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 14: 56–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H., and Rita F. Wong
1983 “Voice quality settings and the teaching of pronunciation.” TESOL Quarterly 17(1): 89–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esposito, Christina M.
2006 “The Effects of Linguistic Experience on the Perception of Phonation.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles 2006.Google Scholar
2010 “The Effects of Linguistic Experience on the Perception of Phonation.” Journal of Phonetics 38: 306–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E.
1992 “The intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers.” In Intelligibility in Speech Disorders: Theory, Measurement, and Management, Studies in Speech Pathology and Clinical Linguistics, ed by Raymond D. Kent, 157–232. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E., Murray J. Munro, and Inn R. A. MacKay
1995 “The effect of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants.” Speech Communication 16: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E., Grace H. Yeni-Komshian, and Serena Liu
1999 “Age constraints on second language learning.” Journal of Memory and Language 41: 78–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fought, Carmen
2003 Chicano English in context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Ian Wilson, and Donald Derrick
2013 Articulatory Phonetics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor K.
1970 “Hupa grammar.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley 1970.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, and Peter Ladefoged
2001 “Phonation Types: A Cross-linguistic Overview.” Journal of Phonetics 29: 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grivicic, Tamara, and Chad Nilep
2004 “When Phonation Matters: The Use and Function of yeah and Creaky Voice.” Colorado Research in Linguistics 17: 1–11.Google Scholar
Grosjean, François
1989 “Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person.” Brain and Language 36: 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harmegnies, Bernard, and Albert Landercy
1985 “Language Features in the Long-term Average Spectrum.” Revue de Phonétique Appliquée 73–75: 69–80.Google Scholar
Harmegnies, Bernard, Marielle Bruyninckx, Joaquim Llisterri J, and Dolors Poch
1989 “Effects of Language Change on Voice Quality. An Experimental Contribution to the Study of Catalan-Castillian Case.” Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 489–492.Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline, and Anthony Bladon
1988 “Creak as a Sociophonetic Marker.” Language, Speech and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, ed. by Larry M. Hyman and Charles N. Li, 3–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heselwood, Barry, and Zahra Mahmoodzade
2007 “Vowel Onset Characteristics as a Function of Voice and Manner Contrast in Persian Coronal Stops.” Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, ed. by Barry Heselwood and Cécil De Cat, 12: 125–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith
2003 Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A., and Christina Esposito
2006 “Linguistic Voice Quality.” UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 105:85–91.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji-Young
The Use of Creaky Voice by Spanish Heritage Speakers in the US.” Poster Presentation at the 7th Heritage Language Research Institute, Chicago, IL, June 17–21, 2013.
Kirk, Paul L., Jenny Ladefoged, and Peter Ladefoged
1993 “Quantifying Acoustic Properties of Modal, Breathy and Creaky Vowels in Jalapa Mazatec. American Indian Linguistics and Ethnography in Honor of Laurence C. Thompson, ed. by Anthony Mattina and Timothy Montler, 435–450.Missoula, MT: University of Montana Press.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H., and Laura C. Klatt
1990 “Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception of Voice Quality Variations among Female and Male Talkers.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87: 820–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreiman, Jody, Bruce R. Gerratt, and Sameer U. Khan
2010 “Effects of Native Language on Perception of Voice Quality.” Journal of Phonetics 38: 558–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., Feng-Ming Tsao, and Huei-Mei Liu
2003 “Foreign language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 9096–9101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1971 Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1993 A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, and Ian Maddieson
1996 The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laver, John
1980 The Phonetic Descriptions of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Major, Roy C.
1992 “Losing English as a first language.” The Modern Language Journal 76: 190–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, Elvira, Nieves Valencia, Juana Muñoz, and Humberto Trujillo
1996 “Differences in Voice Quality Between Men and Women: Use of the Long-Term Average Spectrum (LTAS).” Journal of Voice 10 (1): 59–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma
2011 “The semiotic hitchhiker’s guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21: 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Geoffrey S., and Paola Escudero
2007 “A Cross-dialect Comparison of Peninsular- and Peruvian-Spanish Vowels.” Proceedings from the XVI International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed.by Jürgen Trouvain, and William J. Barry, 1505–1508. Saarbrücken: Germany.Google Scholar
Nichols, Jenna
Indexicality and Voice Quality in a French-English Bilingual.” Paper Presentation at the UIC Bilingualism Forum, Chicago, IL, October 4–5, 2012.
Ohala, John
1994 “The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch.” Sound Symbolism, ed. by Leanne H. Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John Ohala, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pittam, Jeffery
1987 “Listeners’ evaluation of voice quality in Australian English speakers.” Language and Speech 30: 99–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J.
2007 “Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4): 478–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Gender and social meaning of non-modal phonation types.” Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Chundra Cathcart, I-Hsuan Chen, Greg Finley, Shinae Kang, Clare S. Sandy, and Elise Stickles, 427–448.Google Scholar
Quenqua, Douglas
They’re, Like, Way Ahead of the Linguistic Currrrve”. The New York Times. Last modified February 27, 2012. [URL]
Stuart-Smith, Jane
1999 “Glasgow: Accent and voice quality.” Urban Voices ed. by Paul Foulkes and Gerard J. Docherty, 203–222. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri
1974 “Social identity and intergroup behavior.” Social Science Information 13: 65–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todaka, Yuichi
1994 “A Cross-language Study of Voice Quality: Bilingual Japanese and American English Speakers.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles 1994.Google Scholar
Trittin, Pamela J., and Andrés de Santos y Lleó
1995 “Voice quality analysis of male and female Spanish speakers.” Speech Communication 16: 359–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Lesley, Nassima B. Abdelli-Beruh, and Dianne Slavin
2012 “Habitual use of vocal fry in young adult female speakers.” Journal of Voice 26: e111–e116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuasa, Ikuko P.
2010 “Creaky voice: A new feminine voice quality for young urban-oriented upwardly mobile American women?” American Speech 85: 315–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Díaz-Campos, Manuel, Juan M. Escalona Torres & Valentyna Filimonova
2020. Sociolinguistics of the Spanish-Speaking World. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
González, Carolina, Christine Weissglass & Daniel Bates
2022. Creaky Voice and Prosodic Boundaries in Spanish: An Acoustic Study. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Peters, Jörg, Marina Frank & Tio Rohloff
2023. Effects of Cognitive Load on Vocal Fold Vibratory Patterns in Bilingual Speakers of Low and High German. Journal of Voice DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.